The 2014 Mac mini has much faster graphics than the 2012 Mac mini.
CPU SUCKS! i7 Quad Core, No! It's DUAL CORE
The 2014 Mac mini has much faster graphics than the 2012 Mac mini.
Really the only advantage is pcie and TB2.
I think TB2 will run at 60HZ.
----------
I may have to wait for Hackintosh Broadwell NUC.
Apple's PCIe isn't an advantage since it is ludicrously overpriced and unreplaceable (no one makes an upgrade for PCIe SSDs and Apple started using them two years ago). On top of that the SSDs they use now are so slow that they don't even perform any better than a SATA3 drive.
Mostly, people said iris run 4k at 60hz on display port. Its interesting for apple not mentioning this on website. Why hdmi?
Iris 5000 lags on 4K.
5000 isn't Iris.
Does Iris 5100 lag on 4K? Presumably HD Graphics 5000 does.
The 2014 Mac mini has much faster graphics than the 2012 Mac mini.
Best Buy was selling the quad core i7 version a couple months back for $650, before applying a 10% coupon. I passed on it, held out for today's announcement I guess. Should've bought it
Much faster? Can't say I'm surprised by that comment...
Here's a comparison:
HD 4000
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=Intel+HD+4000
HD 5000
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=Intel+HD+5000
HD 5100
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=Intel+Iris+5100
----------
So after almost two years:
- Quad-Core Dropped;
- No DGPU (expected, even though I wanted one) and not even Iris PRO (HD 5200);
- Not capable of driving 4K decently;
- No SSD standard, not even Fusion standard except for the high end;
No...I will not be getting this overpriced machine...I mean, look at the high end option, it's ridiculous!
Might be some refurbs, I got one a couple of months back.Best Buy was selling the quad core i7 version a couple months back for $650, before applying a 10% coupon. I passed on it, held out for today's announcement I guess. Should've bought it
So Can someone with a brain functioning at higher capacity than mine is today tell me, how would the New Base/Mid models compare to my "old" Mac Mini Server in terms of performance?
Mac Mini Server (Mid 2011)
* Proc: 2Ghz Core i7 (Quad Core) (I can't remember if this is sandy bridge/ivy/etc...)
* Mem: 8GB 1600MHz DDR3
* Gfx: Intel HD 3000 (512MB)
* 2x 500GB Disk (1x 5400 RMP, 1x 7200 RPM)
Trying to decide out I'm feeling here. This is the punt they could have released a year ago. The perfect configuration to bridge the time needed for Intel to make it interesting but mere months before they can.
Ok, put on my logistics hat. Apple would have upgraded sooner had they known how long intel was actually going to take. But intel promised and slipped and promised and slipped and promised and slipped. Each time, Apple (think charlie brown with the football) got everything ready to push forward and had to pull back. Each new delay, burning through another 3-4 months.
They've finally had enough and are pushing what they can now.