The current i7 model is the high water mark for this product - it's very fast, very quiet and the parts are user replaceable.
I would not make the mistake of waiting for the next model. Looking at the way Apple is going, it will be designed to maximize profits....at the cost of user-friendliness. The next model will be barely faster, it will use a lot less power and all the bits will be soldered in so that you pay through the nose if you want it with more RAM or more hard drive capacity. You'll get your AC, but it is really not going to help increase your experienced wifi speed much in real life. And you'll get an intro offer to become a cloud storage junkie - yippee.
I can understand people's desire to get an updated Mac Mini but, really there is such a thing as being too clever. Buy the current model while you can.
The previous i7-3720QM has a passmark score of 8326. Comparing Intel and Apple specs it looks like the new top of the line Mini has a i7-4578U processor. That one has a passmark score of 5204. Loos like we went backwards.
The previous i7-3720QM has a passmark score of 8326. Comparing Intel and Apple specs it looks like the new top of the line Mini has a i7-4578U processor. That one has a passmark score of 5204. Loos like we went backwards.
I think the new title of this thread should be: "Abandon hope, all ye who enter here!"I hope Apple brings back quad core with the next refresh.
I was planning to consider the new quad-core and now there isn't one.
i7-3820QM?Geekbench shows the 2012 Mini i7-3820QM at 3300 single core and 13000 multi core.
No, the whole OS uses Grand Central Dispatch since OS X 10.6. That means the whole OS is faster on 4 core (or more) machines. Hyper-threading is meaningless because this is thread management in hardware and uses only the AVAILABLE execution resources, which is useless if for example a VM-software or Handbrake uses already both cores and their execution resources.Hola... hate to be that guy, but could someone please explain (in simple terms) what the real-life difference would be between a dual-core and a quad-core?
Sincere question, btw. I presume that in more arduous tasks (VM's; video-editing(??) etc.) it would be felt - but is that it?
Maybe they update it to quad on tuesday. Thats why they didnt do it now.
I have heard a rumor that if we don't make it to 5000 posts the new mini will have HD4600 graphics.
This was just a bad joke. The real new mini is almost certainly coming on Tuesday.
So it can be assumed that all of the new minis are not fanless, eh?
Well, I woke up to discover that a new range of Minis have been unleashed, and nearly 300 posts were added to the thread since I nodded off in the evening of 16 October, where I am at.
However that changes nothing. There is now a range of 2014 Mac Minis, but I think you can be sure that a new Mac Mini is almost certainly coming, sooner or later.
I got a new monitor yesterday, replacing the one I got with my original 2005 Mini.
I doubt that I will be getting a 2014 Mini any time soon. With Yosemite, an SSD and maybe bit more RAM, I reckon my 2009 Mini will soldier on for another generation or so.
Apple labored mightily, and brought forth a mouse.
When do you think the new Mac mini is coming?
The Haswell CPU in the new mini does not support fanless, AFAIK.
You're right. I didn't even see the joke coming! The alleged new mini with it's crappy low-voltage dual core CPU is just a way of really psyching us out. Man they totally got me.
Looking forward to to next Tuesday when the real 2014 mini will hit the Apple Store. Quad-core 2.8 Haswell, Iris Pro and replaceable RAM. I AM READY!