Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The New Mac Pro is Here – But Can We Build it Better (and Cheaper) PC DIY Style?

I doubt your claims are true. Ars Technica has not said they were left out or that if they were left out, it was because of a critical review.

slughead wrote, "Anandtech wrote a critical review, and they were left out," which is clearly not the case since Anandtech was given the new Mac Pro, late 2013 retina MacBook Pro, etc.

Let's stick to verifiable facts please.


Well it is certainly true that Apple favour certain outlets and if you anger them you don't get stuff. There is plenty of evidence of that. A recent Macbreak Weekly (I think - it might have been TWiT) covered this and gave many examples including Leo Laporte being left out in the cold despite his massive audience.

I think slughead means ars technica not anandtech. Dave Girard wrote this and Ars haven't been given one. If they read his forum posts the past few days they may not send him one either, he is highly critical of Open CL on OS X from what I gleaned.

Not that I'd expect any review from a technical site to be up yet as it is too soon with the holidays.
 
Can we stop with the conspiracy theories please? Apple gave Anand the new Mac Pro at the same time that they gave everyone else review units. He's just taking longer to review it.

https://twitter.com/anandshimpi/status/413775630933585920

I think he meant ArsTechnica

----------

I doubt your claims are true. Ars Technica has not said they were left out or that if they were left out, it was because of a critical review.

slughead wrote, "Anandtech wrote a critical review, and they were left out," which is clearly not the case since Anandtech was given the new Mac Pro, late 2013 retina MacBook Pro, etc.

Let's stick to verifiable facts please.

There's a massive thread on the nMP on the AT forums were an ArsTechnica editor mentioned that they did not recieve a review unit.
 
I doubt your claims are true. Ars Technica has not said they were left out or that if they were left out, it was because of a critical review.

slughead wrote, "Anandtech wrote a critical review, and they were left out," which is clearly not the case since Anandtech was given the new Mac Pro, late 2013 retina MacBook Pro, etc.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/18532430/

Let's stick to verifiable facts please.

On macrumors? When hell freezes over.
 
Given that the D700 is a 15% underclocked 7970, seems like it's a massive markup to me.

The PCIe SSD's are they only thing I find that gives value to the machine.
 
OK, that makes sense if slughead wrote Anandtech instead of ArsTechnica.

I am still doubtful about claims that Apple did not send ArsTechnica a machine because of a critical review. As far as I can tell, all of this is based on conjecture, not verifiable fact. The Verge was not given the iPhone 5s when it came out, but they were given the new Mac Pro. I doubt that they were not given the iPhone 5s because of a previous "critical" review.

I think he meant ArsTechnica

----------



There's a massive thread on the nMP on the AT forums were an ArsTechnica editor mentioned that they did not recieve a review unit.

 
Can we stop with the conspiracy theories please? Apple gave Anand the new Mac Pro at the same time that they gave everyone else review units. He's just taking longer to review it.

I think slughead means ars technica not anandtech. Dave Girard wrote this and Ars haven't been given one. If they read his forum posts the past few days they may not send him one either, he is highly critical of Open CL on OS X from what I gleaned.

I think he meant ArsTechnica

I doubt your claims are true. Ars Technica has not said they were left out or that if they were left out, it was because of a critical review.

Woops, you're right, I did mean Ars. BEIGE (Dave Girard) posted on here saying he hasn't gotten one in spite of their massive audience. He said they were "left out." When asked if it was because of their negative review, he said "possibly" but he didn't know.
 
Still, Z420 is a very different machine. Unlike nMP, Z420 is a universal computer which can be expanded in many ways. Sure, nMP may provide enough for many users but that's not my point. My point is that to produce a universal workstation HP had to use a bigger chassis (cost), more ports (cost), bigger power supply (600W) to accommodate various graphic cards etc. And it comes with 3 year warranty (which include on site service). AppleCare costs extra ($250) and no on-site service.

That is the most delusional thing I have ever heard. Do you have any idea how insanely expensive it is to miniaturize a computer to 1/12th it's previous size and create an enclosure using titanium?

The additional crappy steel, dollar store power supply and dollar store ports, cost $10 per computer, including R&D for HP.

The miniaturization of the Mac Pro cost $150,000,000, and it easily adds hundreds to the cost of each unit over the first year.

As for the warranty I don't think you understand what HP means by "on site support".

Here is what will happen:

- You call up HP and tell them your video card has an intermittent issue and needs to be replaced, they will spend 4 hours on the phone asking you to turn the machine on and off and telling you that they detect no issue.
- They tell you that they will send a technician out so you can show them the issue, in 3 days.
- The technician comes, he's as motivated as a cable guy and constantly complains about being sent on site. You have to walk him through the issue personally and tell him how to fix your computer. He decides to replace the motherboard, even though it's clearly a video card issue, the parts will take 7 days to arrive, and wasted 2 hours of your time.
- Motherboard installed, realizes video card needs replacing. 2 hours on the phone and 2 days to get an on site tech back.
- 7 more days for the parts to arrive, and 3 more hours of wasted time while you walk him through how to fix the issue.

That's 17 days of wasted productivity and 11 hours of wasted time, and very unprofessional.

Here's what happens with Apple:

- I walk across the street, give them my broken computer, and pick up a loaner (2 week return policy). If they can't fix it there they air mail it to where they can and guarantee it fixed in 7 days.

That's 20 minutes of wasted productivity, and 20 minutes of wasted time.

I would pay $2000 to HP if they offered this kind of warranty on my $6,000 workstation, but Apple only charges $249.


In any case the Mac Pro is very aggressively priced. Anyone trying to argue otherwise has no idea what they are talking about. Apple basically designed the product to be an extremely attractive value. I've done the math and it's even competitive with building an equivalent desktop yourself.
 
Woops, you're right, I did mean Ars. BEIGE (Dave Girard) posted on here saying he hasn't gotten one in spite of their massive audience. He said they were "left out." When asked if it was because of their negative review, he said "possibly" but he didn't know.


I still find it hard to believe that Apple would intentionally not send review units to a tech website because of critical articles. As I said before, other tech websites like the Verge have at times not received review units from Apple and it is not clear that that was because of critical coverage of the company.
 
I still find it hard to believe that Apple would intentionally not send review units to a tech website because of critical articles. As I said before, other tech websites like the Verge have at times not received review units from Apple and it is not clear that that was because of critical coverage of the company.

No, it's not clear, you're right. It never is. I can't really fathom a scenario which it may be "clear", except maybe if Tim Cook threw a hissy fit and publicly chastised Ars for peeing on the hype parade, resulting in the biggest PR nightmare ever.

This is the problem with pre-release hardware reviews--there is always bias, even if unspoken. Girard even mentioned that "well at least I wont feel like I owe Apple anything" when talking about how he didn't get a prerelease nMP.
 
That is the most delusional thing I have ever heard. Do you have any idea how insanely expensive it is to miniaturize a computer to 1/12th it's previous size and create an enclosure using titanium?

The additional crappy steel, dollar store power supply and dollar store ports, cost $10 per computer, including R&D for HP.

The miniaturization of the Mac Pro cost $150,000,000, and it easily adds hundreds to the cost of each unit over the first year.

As for the warranty I don't think you understand what HP means by "on site support".

Here is what will happen:

- You call up HP and tell them your video card has an intermittent issue and needs to be replaced, they will spend 4 hours on the phone asking you to turn the machine on and off and telling you that they detect no issue.
- They tell you that they will send a technician out so you can show them the issue, in 3 days.
- The technician comes, he's as motivated as a cable guy and constantly complains about being sent on site. You have to walk him through the issue personally and tell him how to fix your computer. He decides to replace the motherboard, even though it's clearly a video card issue, the parts will take 7 days to arrive, and wasted 2 hours of your time.
- Motherboard installed, realizes video card needs replacing. 2 hours on the phone and 2 days to get an on site tech back.
- 7 more days for the parts to arrive, and 3 more hours of wasted time while you walk him through how to fix the issue.

That's 17 days of wasted productivity and 11 hours of wasted time, and very unprofessional.

Here's what happens with Apple:

- I walk across the street, give them my broken computer, and pick up a loaner (2 week return policy). If they can't fix it there they air mail it to where they can and guarantee it fixed in 7 days.

That's 20 minutes of wasted productivity, and 20 minutes of wasted time.

I would pay $2000 to HP if they offered this kind of warranty on my $6,000 workstation, but Apple only charges $249.


In any case the Mac Pro is very aggressively priced. Anyone trying to argue otherwise has no idea what they are talking about. Apple basically designed the product to be an extremely attractive value. I've done the math and it's even competitive with building an equivalent desktop yourself.

Speaking of delusional...

It is only difficult to miniaturise something when you preserve full functionality. That's not what Apple did. They cut the crap out of the computer. You must think then that Intel NUC is the superior computer to Mac Pro. Of course it is not (even though it is much smaller). It was made for a different purpose. As was Mac Pro (compared to a Workstation).

BTW, I am not sure where you read that Mac Pro has titanium anything. But even if it did, it would not cost that much. It's just like the case with iPhones. Many people will say that it's expensive because it uses "premium" materials for the case. The truth is that with its premium materials, iPhone's BOM (bill of materials) is lower than BOMs for most other high end phones on the market (definitely lower than BOM for plastic Samsung S4 and Note 3).
 
BTW, I am not sure where you read that Mac Pro has titanium anything. But even if it did, it would not cost that much. It's just like the case with iPhones. Many people will say that it's expensive because it uses "premium" materials for the case. The truth is that with its premium materials, iPhone's BOM (bill of materials) is lower than BOMs for most other high end phones on the market (definitely lower than BOM for plastic Samsung S4 and Note 3).

Its not just the cost of the materials that are used. Fabrication of these parts are probably much more involved. Apples use of the unibody styled which must be machined from solid billets of aluminum rather then stamped from sheet metal for example.
 
No, it's not clear, you're right. It never is. I can't really fathom a scenario which it may be "clear", except maybe if Tim Cook threw a hissy fit and publicly chastised Ars for peeing on the hype parade, resulting in the biggest PR nightmare ever.

This is the problem with pre-release hardware reviews--there is always bias, even if unspoken. Girard even mentioned that "well at least I wont feel like I owe Apple anything" when talking about how he didn't get a prerelease nMP.

I understand your point, and yes, it may be true that Apple uses unpredictability in allocating review units as a means to force tech websites to self-censor in favor of Apple, but I highly doubt it. I wish people would stop acting as if it were a given. Those websites can just as well buy the review units outright and send them back within 14 days. They don’t NEED to get review units from Apple.

The only advantage organizations that get review units have is early access, but, assuming that tech readers visit a site because of its content/reliability and not necessarily just because it is the first to get out reviews (think Anandtech), having that early access may not be as important to the sites.
 
The only advantage organizations that get review units have is early access, but, assuming that tech readers visit a site because of its content/reliability and not necessarily just because it is the first to get out reviews (think Anandtech), having that early access may not be as important to the sites.

Early and free access. Don't forget.

Getting the review out there when the article is in most demand is ridiculously important. Getting side-lined because you're honest can easily cost more readership than than the credibility will grant you.
 
Speaking of delusional...

It is only difficult to miniaturise something when you preserve full functionality. That's not what Apple did. They cut the crap out of the computer. You must think then that Intel NUC is the superior computer to Mac Pro. Of course it is not (even though it is much smaller). It was made for a different purpose. As was Mac Pro (compared to a Workstation).

BTW, I am not sure where you read that Mac Pro has titanium anything. But even if it did, it would not cost that much. It's just like the case with iPhones. Many people will say that it's expensive because it uses "premium" materials for the case. The truth is that with its premium materials, iPhone's BOM (bill of materials) is lower than BOMs for most other high end phones on the market (definitely lower than BOM for plastic Samsung S4 and Note 3).

As a product designer. It always amazing to hear how people react to high end products and say that they are overprice crap and that they could make them in their kitchen with some play doh.

These are the same people which would likely quote you $40 as the value of a Van Gogh painting as that's the cost of the materials.

The new Mac Pro is a workstation that is only 340 cubic inches in size. For comparison an intel Z820 is 3000 cubic inches in size.

The price of this miniaturization works out to be around $2,500 per unit sold (using the last Mac Pro refresh sales figures).

That is the cost of pushing the bleeding edge of technology.

Using the intel NUC to argue that the Mac Pro is a poor value does not make sense. The intel NUC actually takes up more space than a laptop without the screen clam shell. It is not a step forward but a step sideways, and it cost next to nothing to develop.

The thing is though that Apple is basically selling the Mac Pro without any mark up for R&D, they are basically absorbing all of their costs, which is what makes this machine an incredible bargain.
 
I understand your point, and yes, it may be true that Apple uses unpredictability in allocating review units as a means to force tech websites to self-censor in favor of Apple, but I highly doubt it. I wish people would stop acting as if it were a given. Those websites can just as well buy the review units outright and send them back within 14 days. They don’t NEED to get review units from Apple.

The only advantage organizations that get review units have is early access, but, assuming that tech readers visit a site because of its content/reliability and not necessarily just because it is the first to get out reviews (think Anandtech), having that early access may not be as important to the sites.

You might find this interesting.

http://www.cultofmac.com/255618/how-apples-blacklist-manipulates-the-press/
 
Meh, it's not easy, but console makers frequently turn general computers into highly specialised devices that also, magically, take up virtually no room at all (compared to a normal computer)

With most configurations shunting the majority of the processing power to the GPU's, which unlike Nvidia cards, don't have access to CUDA, Apple have infact made a console that runs OSX and FCPX really well, (compared to previous models) and that's it. By the time developers fully integrate OpenCL (which by the way, is fully dependant on the adoption of the Mac Pro in industry) the underclocked, overpriced, already 2 year old 7970's in the current nMP may seem rather ancient.
 
Most tech sites have budgets to buy review units. And in cases where the units can be sent back (as is the case with Apple products), then there is no significant cost the organization.

Getting the article out as fast as possible is not the most important consideration, reader confidence and, at the very least, the appearance of objectivity are.

Again, if Apple does not send a tech website/reviewer review units, the website/reviewer can simply buy it and send it back within 14 days. The Verge did this with the iPhone 5s and other reviewers with smaller audiences (such as Detroit Borg) also do this. Audiences will forgive lateness as long as they trust the reviewer.

Early and free access. Don't forget.

Getting the review out there when the article is in most demand is ridiculously important. Getting side-lined because you're honest can easily cost more readership than than the credibility will grant you.
 
Buy a nMP, receive it in March and return it in 14 days do you mean? Even Anandtech will have their review by then.

No, receiving Apple review units early is a privilege too many sites are desperate to keep. I'm not sure whether Arstechnica where ever in the goodbooks but Apple is notorious for holding grudges and distinguishing between "bloggers" and "Journalists" - I wonder which professional VFX news magazine ever received a review unit.
 
As a product designer. It always amazing to hear how people react to high end products and say that they are overprice crap and that they could make them in their kitchen with some play doh.

These are the same people which would likely quote you $40 as the value of a Van Gogh painting as that's the cost of the materials.

The new Mac Pro is a workstation that is only 340 cubic inches in size. For comparison an intel Z820 is 3000 cubic inches in size.

The price of this miniaturization works out to be around $2,500 per unit sold (using the last Mac Pro refresh sales figures).

That is the cost of pushing the bleeding edge of technology.

Using the intel NUC to argue that the Mac Pro is a poor value does not make sense. The intel NUC actually takes up more space than a laptop without the screen clam shell. It is not a step forward but a step sideways, and it cost next to nothing to develop.

The thing is though that Apple is basically selling the Mac Pro without any mark up for R&D, they are basically absorbing all of their costs, which is what makes this machine an incredible bargain.

Let me ask you this, BOSE, value for money ? I'm after the best sound quality.

Beats ....

Do you see why people consider some very expansive brands to be crap, for the price.

Don't confuse R&D with excellent markerting .
 
Buy a nMP, receive it in March and return it in 14 days do you mean? Even Anandtech will have their review by then.

No, receiving Apple review units early is a privilege too many sites are desperate to keep. I'm not sure whether Arstechnica where ever in the goodbooks but Apple is notorious for holding grudges and distinguishing between "bloggers" and "Journalists" - I wonder which professional VFX news magazine ever received a review unit.

I mean that if you didn’t receive notification that you were going to get a review unit on December 19 when everyone else did, you would have ordered a unit then, and had it shipped to you in January. Most in-depth reviews, including Anand’s, will probably be released around then if not later. Many reviewers buy review units themselves and release reviews after the product has publicly launched, yet they still manage to attract significant audiences.
 
Buy a nMP, receive it in March and return it in 14 days do you mean? Even Anandtech will have their review by then.

No, receiving Apple review units early is a privilege too many sites are desperate to keep. I'm not sure whether Arstechnica where ever in the goodbooks but Apple is notorious for holding grudges and distinguishing between "bloggers" and "Journalists" - I wonder which professional VFX news magazine ever received a review unit.

He's never going to accept any of this. All reviews of Apple products are unbiased, Apple never does anything wrong, the new Mac Pro is perfect.
 
Let me ask you this, BOSE, value for money ? I'm after the best sound quality.

Beats ....

Do you see why people consider some very expansive brands to be crap, for the price.

Don't confuse R&D with excellent markerting .

I actually love BOSE, generally they don't offer good products or good value for money in their core offerings but because of their corporate muscle they are capable to entering consumer industries that are gimmicky or are a niche and offering the best products in these industries.

For example, BOSE has the absolute best small portable speaker that money can buy, the Soundlink Mini. This is an industry is largely populated by poorly performing products.

Likewise they have the best speakers with a small desktop footprint. The companion 5 (though I wouldn't own them myself, and quickly returned them. I think it's better to own speakers that are bigger and sound better).

BOSE also has the best sound canceling headphones that money can buy, the QC20i. I have a set and they are my favorite headphones to use day to day, especially at work. No other competitor comes close in this category.

I think Beats generally doesn't make very good products for the money, but Monster, which is known for being even worse, has the Monster Turbine Pro earbuds which are probably the best earbuds in the $250 range.

I personally believe that marketing is all BS, in the end the quality of the product is what matters. Sooner or later people will figure out if your products are any good is and if you mislead them your company will lose in the long run, in that not only will you stop selling your terrible products but you will be unable to sell good ones.
 
Buy a nMP, receive it in March and return it in 14 days do you mean? Even Anandtech will have their review by then.

No, receiving Apple review units early is a privilege too many sites are desperate to keep. I'm not sure whether Arstechnica where ever in the goodbooks but Apple is notorious for holding grudges and distinguishing between "bloggers" and "Journalists" - I wonder which professional VFX news magazine ever received a review unit.

Thanks for sharing your baseless assumptions about my current and future judgments.:rolleyes:

I miss ThinkSecret (sued out of existence by Apple for "not being a journalist").
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.