Some of the decisions it looks like Apple is going to make seem crazy, but others I can understand. Considering they're fully committed to USB-C, I get dropping legacy ports, and even MagSafe (even if it's one of the best charging ports I've dealt with). I think most people can even live without the SD Card slot, as a fair amount of photos have been pushed to cloud services and you can use USB-C to export your DSLR Raw photos to your MacBook. But...
Ditching the 3.5mm and HDMI for a "Pro" laptop is absolutely insane. Is getting rid of 3.5 really making the system thinner? If not there is absolutely no reason to ditch it, other than brand unity. On a phone, okay that system is small and the space can be used better. On a 13" laptop (or bigger)? And why is Apple so conscious over thinness? When I pay $1500 or more for something, I'd prefer it to feel substantial rather than flimsy. I'm also not a musician, so I can't comment on the necessity of 3.5mm to their profession, but plenty have made their thoughts known.
On a more personally applicable note, I'll never buy a laptop without HDMI until there is a legit replacement for it. No displays use USB-C, and I still occasionally run into issues with my rMBP not supporting VGA/DVI (my work has a lot of old tech, what can I say). Thankfully in the few years, everyone has settled on HDMI, and just about every display made has HDMI ports. TB, or USB-C->HDMI are not viable alternatives, as I don't want to carry an adaptor with my computer 24/7. Hey Apple, it doesn't matter how thin or light the computer is if I have to carry a bundle of 3 cords everywhere I go so it's compatible with anything else in the world.
Maybe the loss of Steve really has set the company adrift, because it seems like a lot of what Cook is doing is following Steve's mandates from years ago. When we were on the iPhone 3GS, thinness was important. It's not anymore, the damn thing is thin enough. Where is the creative thinking? For example, an iPhone Pro, slightly thicker with better specs, a metal backing like the MBP, and a built in Pico-projector, would be amazingly cool. Instead we're just going to keep getting thinner, lighter, and faster until my phone feels like a stick of double mint gum.
Ditching the 3.5mm and HDMI for a "Pro" laptop is absolutely insane. Is getting rid of 3.5 really making the system thinner? If not there is absolutely no reason to ditch it, other than brand unity. On a phone, okay that system is small and the space can be used better. On a 13" laptop (or bigger)? And why is Apple so conscious over thinness? When I pay $1500 or more for something, I'd prefer it to feel substantial rather than flimsy. I'm also not a musician, so I can't comment on the necessity of 3.5mm to their profession, but plenty have made their thoughts known.
On a more personally applicable note, I'll never buy a laptop without HDMI until there is a legit replacement for it. No displays use USB-C, and I still occasionally run into issues with my rMBP not supporting VGA/DVI (my work has a lot of old tech, what can I say). Thankfully in the few years, everyone has settled on HDMI, and just about every display made has HDMI ports. TB, or USB-C->HDMI are not viable alternatives, as I don't want to carry an adaptor with my computer 24/7. Hey Apple, it doesn't matter how thin or light the computer is if I have to carry a bundle of 3 cords everywhere I go so it's compatible with anything else in the world.
Maybe the loss of Steve really has set the company adrift, because it seems like a lot of what Cook is doing is following Steve's mandates from years ago. When we were on the iPhone 3GS, thinness was important. It's not anymore, the damn thing is thin enough. Where is the creative thinking? For example, an iPhone Pro, slightly thicker with better specs, a metal backing like the MBP, and a built in Pico-projector, would be amazingly cool. Instead we're just going to keep getting thinner, lighter, and faster until my phone feels like a stick of double mint gum.