Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

The Panther Thread

Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
So it's not an "emulation layer" to let software run that was intended for newer OS,
it's a "porting layer" that let's developers create binaries for older MacOS versions.

Thx
Doc
 
I always tend to use the OS that the machine came with, Cube 9.0.4 instead of 9.2.2, Mac mini 10.3 instead of 10.4 (the 1,5 G4mini has to be 10.4). To my experience newer OS don't bring a big benefit, software that requires it mostly does not run well on older hardware...
 
dr.zeissler said:
So it's not an "emulation layer" to let software run that was intended for newer OS,
it's a "porting layer" that let's developers create binaries for older MacOS versions.
Click to expand...

Well, it does have certain functionality to support older systems in cases where needed (`legacy-support` library, for example). So if you mean whether MacPorts allows to run some newer software on legacy systems which otherwise will not build or run by default, then yes, it does that. It is not an emulation layer though, it just carries some patches and in some cases provides extra libraries to supplement missing functionality.
 
dr.zeissler said:
I always tend to use the OS that the machine came with, Cube 9.0.4 instead of 9.2.2, Mac mini 10.3 instead of 10.4 (the 1,5 G4mini has to be 10.4). To my experience newer OS don't bring a big benefit, software that requires it mostly does not run well on older hardware...
Click to expand...

I cannot really comment on anything earlier than late G4 hardware, I never had those machines, and while my first OS was 10.2, briefly, I never touched anything prior to 10.4 as a developer.

I am confident to say that one does get very tangible benefits with switching from 10.4 to 10.6, for example, on a decently fast PowerPC hardware. I have a lot of modern stuff working on my PowerMacs which would not build on 10.4 and some of it won’t build on 10.5. And it works reasonably well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dr.zeissler
I bought Basic for MacOS version 4.62 was the last to run on 10.3...I loaded up some scene code but was never able to get anything to work due to the limitations of some required libs only existing for windows and some different calls, only Basic 5.xx offers... it was a big failure...so very disappointing...it would have been a very cool thing if I had pulled that of, but without programing experience it's simply a no-go...
 
barracuda156 said:
I cannot really comment on anything earlier than late G4 hardware, I never had those machines, and while my first OS was 10.2, briefly, I never touched anything prior to 10.4 as a developer.

I am confident to say that one does get very tangible benefits with switching from 10.4 to 10.6, for example, on a decently fast PowerPC hardware. I have a lot of modern stuff working on my PowerMacs which would not build on 10.4 and some of it won’t build on 10.5. And it works reasonably well.
Click to expand...
I have some G5 machines and a G4 with sonnet 1.8 and 4600ti, but these machines are too loud, too big....I always tend to fall back to the MacMini's...small, mostly silent....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dr.zeissler
dr.zeissler said:
I bought Basic for MacOS version 4.62 was the last to run on 10.3...I loaded up some scene code but was never able to get anything to work due to the limitations of some required libs only existing for windows and some different calls, only Basic 5.xx offers... it was a big failure...so very disappointing...it would have been a very cool thing if I had pulled that of, but without programing experience it's simply a no-go...
Click to expand...

Cannot help on Basic, perhaps check this: https://github.com/JohnBlood/awesome-basic
And this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4110720/what-is-a-good-basic-compiler-for-mac-osx

Pretty sure some of suggested implementations had powerpc versions. If you bump into something that fits your needs and existed for powerpc, it could be added into MacPorts.
 
dr.zeissler said:
Can't find a list of software that is enabled to run on panther with nacports1.6...or have I overlooked that? sorry
Click to expand...

Well, there is no such a thing even now as a list of supported software per-macOS-version, but an assumption is that as long as MacPorts itself officially supported Panther, most of ports supported it either, or at least most of fundamental ports did.

So the way to go about that is:
1. Confirm which was the latest MacPorts release to support 10.3.
2. Install that locally.
3. If that works, extract corresponding archive of port files, edit sources.conf to use that.
4. Try building something simple.
5. If that also works, install the complete toolchain (whatever was there at the moment, cmake? ld64? cctools? gcc-4.*?) and start building w/e you may wish to use.

P. S. Not sure if anyone bothers to reply or this will be just closed, but in case, I have asked this question for you: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71609
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: repairedCheese and dr.zeissler
Thx, it a bit like the other way round....here is my porting kit, give me a problem (software) that does not run on panther but should be run and the hardware-requirements implicate that this is possible. With my lack of experience it would be hard to even setup the software itself... let alone finding a real target for it.
 
dr.zeissler said:
Thx, it a bit like the other way round....here is my porting kit, give me a problem (software) that does not run on panther but should be run and the hardware-requirements implicate that this is possible. With my lack of experience it would be hard to even setup the software itself... let alone finding a real target for it.
Click to expand...

If you have everything that you want to work on Panther already working, then perhaps no need to bother with MacPorts. If there is something that you would like to have (whether a particular software or an undefined tool for a specific task, like “something to play YouTube”), then it may be worth the effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dr.zeissler
Mostly I have everything I need in panther already...perhaps I will find something in the future.
MP4 encoder requires tiger, my eyetv-software runs on 10.4. with G4 1,5Mini, the older version (2.x) does not like my eyetv-box and hangs panther...but that is not essential to me, not on that machine. I still use the older aleph-one ports that do run on panther, the all-in-one package (one-file with icon) requires tiger... but it's not really better. Internet is not essential for me...my old firefox runs on panther and start "macintosh garden" that's all I need.
 
Project Alice said:
In my experience, booting an existing install of a "too old" version sometimes works. I have Jaguar working on the last of the eMacs, 1.42GHz model. I just installed 10.2.8 using another Mac, and it booted up on the eMac. So that might be the case for this too.
Click to expand...

No dice, this is a very well-known model NOT to boot "anything": OS 9, Jaguar and Panther. IIRC even early Tiger is a no-go. That's why I asked @LightBulbFun if he could tell us the steps he took to boot Panther on the DLSD (PowerBook5,8 or its 17 incher equivalent) successfully, because achieving such a feat IS monumental.

So yesterday to refresh my memory I tried it again. This is what happens:

10.3.9: hardlock after the Apple logo shows up and the spinning picture underneath it is spinning (with the spinning halted/frozen). Waited 10 minutes to see if it wasn't truly hardlocked, but it was.

10.2.8: Kernel panic soon after Apple logo shows up, with the multi-language message. No verbose error logs shown.

10.2.8 with all ATI kexts removed: Hardlock/Crashes around at the same time Panther does, with the main difference being visual glitches appear on the screen. Waited 10 minutes after that, too, but no luck.

Ideas? Despite being the most powerful PowerPC laptop there ever was, it is also my Mac hardware that collects the most amount of dust because of this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back