I have to disagree. I'm a parent of a couple of those "new college students" who yes, did have iPhones and an iPad. And they both immediately loved and did just fine with Mac OS - way better than Windows - both in high school and now in college.
I understand what you’re saying here, but I should’ve specified that I was speaking of high school and elementary school, where chromebooks are widely used. Not necessarily high school students entering college. Though I did use that as an example to illustrate my point.
From a market perspective, the best “chromebook fighter” in Apple’s product range is the iPad, and not a potential cheaper MacBook. After all, children today grow up in a world of smartphones and iPads, and as such, the ideal choice for k-12 education would be along those lines.
And, to the counter argument that part of education should be using more advanced devices (a policy I wholeheartedly agree with), the solution is the same as it has always been: computer labs with desktops.
My concept is as follows:
For general k-12 education, students would use iPads as general purpose devices. And to teach students how to use devices running a desktop OS, they would have designated computer labs.
This would be a better solution, in my opinion, than to have a bespoke MacBook, that by necessity you’d have to teach younger students to use before they can use it for general coursework.
Since children already are familiar with iPads or similar devices, the faculty doesn’t have to spend time before their lessons, teaching students how to use a Mac. Which the teachers themselves may not be very familiar with themselves.
(Of course it doesn’t necessarily have to be Apple devices, but you get the point)
With that understanding, a potential MacBook that competes with Chromebooks in that market doesn’t make much sense.
This doesn’t preclude having Macs in schools though. Hence a better solution would be to have a lab with iMacs. Where a school can buy less devices and share them among students more effectively and be able to monitor them more easily.
That way, ideally, students would get the best of both worlds, a cheaper device that they’re already familiar with, and time on a more advanced computer when the need requires it.