He says he doesn't know if it's software or hardware but it's not out for a few months so who knowsOh that‘s a little concerning, it could be the early software tho.
He says he doesn't know if it's software or hardware but it's not out for a few months so who knowsOh that‘s a little concerning, it could be the early software tho.
He says he doesn't know if it's software or hardware but it's not out for a few months so who knows
Ice has come out and said 5x is good but 10x is very noisy and isn't great in testing. slightly worrying but will see.
I see Samsung have trademarked the name "AI phone" and "AI smartphone"
Samsung confirms the Galaxy S24 will be an ‘AI Phone’
Samsung has been on a trademarking spree lately, not just for products coming in a few months but also for ...www.sammobile.com
It certainly seems like Samsung will be leaning more towards AI. I wonder if they will announce features that are also found in the Pixel line up, a best take competitor maybe?
As long as they put a Snapdragon and not the trashy Exynos inside the Ultra, upgrade the camera and keep the great battery life of the S23 Ultra, then it will be a serious contender for phone of the year (2024).
Not to long ago we did hear rumours of a Smart Ring, those rumours seem to have dried up tho. That would have been an interesting product to announce alongside the S24 lineup.
Pre-order gifts will be intestine this year, those of us in the UK, might once again get the 512GB upgrade this year. I hope it's not a free pair of Buds Pro 2 since I already have those 😂
Samsung also has trademarked the Z Fold 7 already as well as many others.I see Samsung have trademarked the name "AI phone" and "AI smartphone"
Samsung confirms the Galaxy S24 will be an ‘AI Phone’
Samsung has been on a trademarking spree lately, not just for products coming in a few months but also for ...www.sammobile.com
It certainly seems like Samsung will be leaning more towards AI. I wonder if they will announce features that are also found in the Pixel line up, a best take competitor maybe?
As long as they put a Snapdragon and not the trashy Exynos inside the Ultra, upgrade the camera and keep the great battery life of the S23 Ultra, then it will be a serious contender for phone of the year (2024).
Not to long ago we did hear rumours of a Smart Ring, those rumours seem to have dried up tho. That would have been an interesting product to announce alongside the S24 lineup.
Pre-order gifts will be intestine this year, those of us in the UK, might once again get the 512GB upgrade this year. I hope it's not a free pair of Buds Pro 2 since I already have those 😂
Samsung also has trademarked the Z Fold 7 already as well as many others.
I fear too much press is focused on a Samsung AI phone and the delivery will be subpar, lessening the value of the phone.
Many people want AI but not for it to do too much for them, I'm one of them. I'd love for live translation in a phone call yet I'm reinvesting a lot of time to learn Spanish. Sony is making huge efforts for phones to detect AI created images and videos.
Frank Herbert, in Dune wrote of the Butleriam Jihad against thinking machines "tho shalt not make a machine in the likeness of the human mind" sooner or later, this may no longer be a fictional endeavor or restriction.
I have read rumors that 12gb ram will be maximum available for the Ultra and 8gb will be the standard on the rest of the series and base ultra. This seems to have upset some people.The S24 line up has leaked online, the Purple and yellow one looks great. I wonder what the online exclusive colours will be.
View attachment 2319831
View attachment 2319832
View attachment 2319833
I have read rumors that 12gb ram will be maximum available for the Ultra and 8gb will be the standard on the rest of the series and base ultra. This seems to have upset some people.
My feeling is in order not to raise the price but add Titanium they needed to cut some corners.
Apparently the new CEO is more about software optimization than raw hardware. Seems like this is in line with that thinking.
One thing I will say in Samsung defense is the ram they use is always the latest and fastest standard. Some companies may use 16 or 24gb ram but is it the very latest standard is just something to consider.
However it seems that Titanium is more important than ram. What do you guys think? Is this a smart way to move forward, specially with the Ultra?
Seems like another top executive pushing a good idea in theory but sort of ignores a big segment of the user base who sed the Ultra as the Ultimate power phone. They want crazy ram. For the money is performance or looks more important? Even more to consider is aluminum armor already works as well or better than Titanium at a fifth the cost. So if you could deliver the same product with Aluminum but more ram would that be a better option since it already has the same benefits as Titanium?
I know I have been on a rant about Titanium but I think it is important because it has a huge impact on the cost of the devices. I love the idea of software optimization leading your hardware but if Samsung starts thinking it can scale back on specs and make up for it with software they are in for a big lesson. I would love better hardware optimization but NOT at the expense at having the best hardware. It would be nice to have both but Samsung has put themselves in a corner in terms of producing cutting edge hardware in their galaxy line up with huge specs. They need to continue to push the envelope with their hardware but also focus more on optimization. The bloat and slow down that OneUI has had over the years is legendary. Although it has gotten a lot better, you don't let off the gas of the hardware. Do both Samsung. 24gb ram ddr6 in the s24 ultra should at least be an option. Does anyone need it? Someone sure will pay for it 😉
That gray looks like winner to me! Can't wait...just 6 more weeks.The S24 line up has leaked online, the Purple and yellow one looks great. I wonder what the online exclusive colours will be.
View attachment 2319831
View attachment 2319832
View attachment 2319833
I agree on all points! I think it is funny how everyone has historically dumped on Samsung for having great hardware but needed to improve on the software side. Now they are improving on the software side and all people do is complain still.I'm all for both software and hardware, there are only so many things that hardware can do, it's why I'm not mad that Samsung aren't changing the design in a dramatic way. I like that Samsung are refining the design, not sure how I feel about a flat display tho (other than the S-Pen will work better on the edges). Software on the other hand, is where a lot of strides can be made. I have been interested in the Google Pixel for a while, they are more software based which is why the Tensor chips are not as good as Snapdragon (Just like Samsung's Exynos). If Samsung can implement a great AI, add features similar to Best Take, magic eraser and so on, then I think the S24 Ultra will be a great device.
Samsung's CEO probably wants what Google have when it comes to AI, all of these companies copy from each other (Apple's use of titanium for example) and that is a good thing, if they can take it make it better.
IF Samsung make the S24 Ultra with the same battery life (or even better) than the S23 Ultra, better cameras, thinner bezels and better software implementation, add more AI features (like Best Take and call screening) then I think the S24 Ultra will be in line as the best phone of 2024. Oh and NO Exynos for those of us in Europe (at least in the S24 Ultra) otherwise that will kill it for me and I won't buy one!!
I'm liking this years colours tho (if the leaks are accurate) I will either be getting the purple or the yellow.
I agree on all points! I think it is funny how everyone has historically dumped on Samsung for having great hardware but needed to improve on the software side. Now they are improving on the software side and all people do is complain still.
It really seems Samsung is going all in on AI and the software experience on the S24. That is a very good thing for everyone looking to buy one.
I think they should go with the snapdragon version in all markets imho. If they put the AI into a subscription based feature....that is huge mistake in my opinion. As these options are free out of the box on the Pixel.
I would like to see cutting edge hardware and software innovation. Software optimisation is good but not at the expense of good hardware/software innovation.I have read rumors that 12gb ram will be maximum available for the Ultra and 8gb will be the standard on the rest of the series and base ultra. This seems to have upset some people.
My feeling is in order not to raise the price but add Titanium they needed to cut some corners.
Apparently the new CEO is more about software optimization than raw hardware. Seems like this is in line with that thinking.
One thing I will say in Samsung defense is the ram they use is always the latest and fastest standard. Some companies may use 16 or 24gb ram but is it the very latest standard is just something to consider.
However it seems that Titanium is more important than ram. What do you guys think? Is this a smart way to move forward, specially with the Ultra?
Seems like another top executive pushing a good idea in theory but sort of ignores a big segment of the user base who sed the Ultra as the Ultimate power phone. They want crazy ram. For the money is performance or looks more important? Even more to consider is aluminum armor already works as well or better than Titanium at a fifth the cost. So if you could deliver the same product with Aluminum but more ram would that be a better option since it already has the same benefits as Titanium?
I know I have been on a rant about Titanium but I think it is important because it has a huge impact on the cost of the devices. I love the idea of software optimization leading your hardware but if Samsung starts thinking it can scale back on specs and make up for it with software they are in for a big lesson. I would love better hardware optimization but NOT at the expense at having the best hardware. It would be nice to have both but Samsung has put themselves in a corner in terms of producing cutting edge hardware in their galaxy line up with huge specs. They need to continue to push the envelope with their hardware but also focus more on optimization. The bloat and slow down that OneUI has had over the years is legendary. Although it has gotten a lot better, you don't let off the gas of the hardware. Do both Samsung. 24gb ram ddr6 in the s24 ultra should at least be an option. Does anyone need it? Someone sure will pay for it 😉
Considering what you are saying I would wait for the s24 plus not the ultra. The s23 plus is fine but the s24 plus will finally have quad hd. It has pretty much all the best features but saves you some money. Why would you buy the ultra if you are barely going to use it?As a part of my total transition from Apple Ecosystem [really hate this thing] I chose to go with a Samsung phone. I am thinking of getting the Ultra but I am Not sure if I should wait for s24 series or get s23. I barely use phone anyway, only for text and calls, occasional Googling, as a tool only and not a mindless scrolling device, and so I am wondering if it is worth it to have the latest, most expensive device.. Thoughts?
I was also thinking of going for Z Flip 5, anyone has experience? It feels like it would serve more than well for my needs, but at the same time I like the screen and pen features of Ultra..
I fully agree that great software is a necessary but NOT at the expense of great hardware:I have read rumors that 12gb ram will be maximum available for the Ultra and 8gb will be the standard on the rest of the series and base ultra. This seems to have upset some people.
My feeling is in order not to raise the price but add Titanium they needed to cut some corners.
Apparently the new CEO is more about software optimization than raw hardware. Seems like this is in line with that thinking.
One thing I will say in Samsung defense is the ram they use is always the latest and fastest standard. Some companies may use 16 or 24gb ram but is it the very latest standard is just something to consider.
However it seems that Titanium is more important than ram. What do you guys think? Is this a smart way to move forward, specially with the Ultra?
Seems like another top executive pushing a good idea in theory but sort of ignores a big segment of the user base who sed the Ultra as the Ultimate power phone. They want crazy ram. For the money is performance or looks more important? Even more to consider is aluminum armor already works as well or better than Titanium at a fifth the cost. So if you could deliver the same product with Aluminum but more ram would that be a better option since it already has the same benefits as Titanium?
I know I have been on a rant about Titanium but I think it is important because it has a huge impact on the cost of the devices. I love the idea of software optimization leading your hardware but if Samsung starts thinking it can scale back on specs and make up for it with software they are in for a big lesson. I would love better hardware optimization but NOT at the expense at having the best hardware. It would be nice to have both but Samsung has put themselves in a corner in terms of producing cutting edge hardware in their galaxy line up with huge specs. They need to continue to push the envelope with their hardware but also focus more on optimization. The bloat and slow down that OneUI has had over the years is legendary. Although it has gotten a lot better, you don't let off the gas of the hardware. Do both Samsung. 24gb ram ddr6 in the s24 ultra should at least be an option. Does anyone need it? Someone sure will pay for it 😉
I do feel that we are currently in an "AI" craze (not at all unlike the smart speaker craze back in 2016), and it will just a matter of time before the hype dies down and tech pundits flit to the next shiny new piece of tech to gush over. I also feel that AI is being used to conflate a number of separate concepts together, which just further muddies the discussion.Unfortunately AI is happening. To what extent it will affect us remains to be seen but huge companies and Governments don't spend huge sums of money without expecting a return on their investment.
Google has shown how useful some AI features can be like call screening and call focus and several others. If a company doesn't get ahead of AI, specially in the tech space they will be left behind and that is never a position you want to be in. A lot of AI right now is about image and potential not reality. Look what will be possible in a few months, years, etc. kind of like VR.
However there are a ton of useful reasons to incorporate more AI as a way to separate your company by features only your AI can do. Again, Google has already demonstrated this.
AI is here and is being driven by people with materialistic goals only or dictatorships looking to control their people vs a healthy mix of capitalism and humanistic principles and I see that as the greatest threat to humanity. Not so much the AI but who is coding it and why.
I have no doubt humanity could create a completely benevolent and helpful AI but will it be what we actually create or will it be something else either determined to rule over humanity or help humanity rule over itself. Either way the future has some heavy implications.
Totally disagree. All the bolded above shows is you do not understand or grasp the enormity of how AI is being used today. It is not even close to the same as smart speakers.I do feel that we are currently in an "AI" craze (not at all unlike the smart speaker craze back in 2016), and it will just a matter of time before the hype dies down and tech pundits flit to the next shiny new piece of tech to gush over. I also feel that AI is being used to conflate a number of separate concepts together, which just further muddies the discussion.
None of which has anything to do with a smartphone (ie: consumer technology). I don't think people want to have full-fledged conversations with their digital assistants, not least because voice is perhaps the most inefficient means of interacting with your devices (which was one of the key reasons why smart speakers failed). Besides, voice assistants has nothing to do with chatGPT.Totally disagree. All the bolded above shows is you do not understand or grasp the enormity of how AI is being used today. It is not even close to the same as smart speakers.
It is being used today by academia and manufacturing to banking to well everything.
Just automation alone is game changing. I can use AI based automation to provide logic to make enterprise global changes to my companies technologies and protocols. It is mind numbing how fast and efficient it is at performing these functions.
The examples you listed were the very bottom and basic of what AI is being used for today behind the scenes at most companies right now. Then AI is growing and evolving at an exponential pace right now.
Weather prediction is going to completely change with AI
Digital Assistants will be so advanced, people will have full fledged conversations width their DA. No more writing emails or writing technical papers
Software and data analysis and data prediction is literally blowing up right now.
Did you know an AI bot passed the bar exam? Let that sink in a little....
So no....the AI craze is not the same and smart speakers....it is not a passing fad....
Unfortunately AI is happening. To what extent it will affect us remains to be seen but huge companies and Governments don't spend huge sums of money without expecting a return on their investment.
Google has shown how useful some AI features can be like call screening and call focus and several others. If a company doesn't get ahead of AI, specially in the tech space they will be left behind and that is never a position you want to be in. A lot of AI right now is about image and potential not reality. Look what will be possible in a few months, years, etc. kind of like VR.
However there are a ton of useful reasons to incorporate more AI as a way to separate your company by features only your AI can do. Again, Google has already demonstrated this.
AI is here and is being driven by people with materialistic goals only or dictatorships looking to control their people vs a healthy mix of capitalism and humanistic principles and I see that as the greatest threat to humanity. Not so much the AI but who is coding it and why.
I have no doubt humanity could create a completely benevolent and helpful AI but will it be what we actually create or will it be something else either determined to rule over humanity or help humanity rule over itself. Either way the future has some heavy implications.