Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Metal 2 is a pretty big step forward. It's not quite on par with DirectX 12, but it's at least finally jumped ahead of where modern OpenGL is. Results of that probably won't turn up for another year as software companies adapt. The Nvidia Metal drivers also continue to be behind the AMD ones.

Dunno what's up with HVEC but the Vega drivers aren't done. Hard to see them shipping the iMac Pro without HVEC acceleration (I don't think the iMac Pro will feature Iris Pro), so seems likely Vega will get HVEC decoding when the drivers are done.

No, not even in Polaris if you read us above
 
In what way, exactly?

They’re not as stable. Sierra marked the first point where you could use the Nvidia Metal drivers and not expect things to just crash. In Sierra they’d render glitchy. They’ve been doing a lot of work on them for High Sierra but I haven’t done much testing on them yet.

Meanwhile the AMD drivers have been pretty solid.
 
Yup: Right now, every available hire is with AMD and coding for VEGA...

...and each of them is working as hard as they can ...both of the coders are really bursting it, too!
 
It looks like Polaris cores plus the new memory subsystem. Maybe also on 12nm instead of 14nm.

PS5 architecture?
 
I checked out some benchmarks and the number of CUs, and the GPUs look a lot like RX665 and RX662.5 (performance at RX565 and RX562.5 tower level with the NUC cooling).
 
Last edited:
Well, there has been a rumor of an RX 500X or RX 600 series with new memory.

What I want is a 75W card that is faster than the 1050 Ti.
 
It kind of makes sense: shrink Vega to 7nm (Vega 20) and don't bother designing small all-new chips with older processes.
 
Vega 12 also appeared in the Linux drivers. Polaris 12 is the RX 550. But it seems Vega 11 was pulled (maybe to avoid confusion with the 2400G), so Vega 12 could actually be the Vega successor to Polaris 11/21 (RX 460/560).

It seems RX 560X is being used unofficially as the clock bump of the also unofficial RX 560M (original RX 560 in laptops).

RX 600 would fit nicely as Polaris with GDDR6 (which would not necessarily include the Kaby Lake G features).
 
Last edited:
There is a rumor going around regarding Intel preparing a gaming graphics card.
What would make sense is to just put something together quickly using the Kaby Lake-G GPU. Single slot would be nice.
 
Last edited:
Raven is "Vega+". This adds full hardware decoding of VP9 (10-bit), instead of hybrid.

If RX 600 got the same video decoder, it would already be great (Kaby doesn't, so maybe using this GPU in cards does not make sense after all).

NVIDIA added VP9 (8-bit) hardware decoding with the GTX 750 SE, GTX 950 and GTX 960 (Titan X and other 700, 800, and 900 series cards do not have it). Starting with Pascal, some chips support 10 or 12-bit.

Intel added VP9 (8-bit) decoding in Apollo Lake. Kaby Lake, Gemini Lake, and Coffee Lake also add 8-bit encoding and 10-bit decoding.
 
Last edited:
The 500X series for OEMs has launched. They adjusted upwards the specification of boost speeds and introduced non-RX parts with 64-bit memory buses.

It does not mean the chips are any different. This is so that common users don't go by reviews or benchmarks performed with old drivers or silicon.
 
Video hardware acceleration is great, but applications should provide OpenCL alternatives.
 
The 500X series for OEMs has launched. They adjusted upwards the specification of boost speeds and introduced non-RX parts with 64-bit memory buses.

It does not mean the chips are any different. This is so that common users don't go by reviews or benchmarks performed with old drivers or silicon.

I don't see higher boost speeds, most of the X-cards are exactly the same as their predecessors:
https://www.amd.com/en/rx-series#paragraph-341606
 
27" 144Hz 4K HDR G-Sync monitor: $3000

Haha. They are not even 3D.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.