The author of the linked blog article appears to be more upset with the quantity and depth of Google-related news on the site as opposed to Apple.
No, as I noted this was a complete 180 from the previous year's WWDC coverage despite, so with that being the effect I posited that their close relationship with Google was the cause.
Read: They said something negative about my favorite company, and I CANNOT TOLERATE THAT!
Some people don't like everything Apple or Google does, and they're allowed to express their opinion if they find something wanting. Some people need to accept this little fact of life and grow the hell up.
Again, not the point at all. Their coverage was 100% negative, to the point of making up grammatical errors in a product ad and writing an entire article about the hubris of Apple based on one joke. It's outrageous. And, their vitriol is a completely different tone from what other sites are writing, as I linked. That and they fact that they are deleting threads in Apple Core and banning commenters looks bad.
I posted 25 links laying out my argument, if you want to reduce it to butthurt, thats your choice I guess. But if you actually compare what they are doing to this time last year and what TechCrunch, Slashgear, ABC News, Engadget, and company are writing it stands out. The question isn't "are they bashing Apple", it's "why are they bashing Apple, and why now"?