OK. And here is Tessmark OpenGL.
And Sanctuary bench.
Not too crazy to draw some conclusions on driver expectations. I know the HW is there it is the optimizations that are troublesome.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is not a "Pro" machine.
- Thread starter timehacker11
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
OK. And here is Tessmark OpenGL.
And Sanctuary bench.
Not too crazy to draw some conclusions on driver expectations. I know the HW is there it is the optimizations that are troublesome.
Ha ha, I haven't burned a physical copy of anything for a client in over 3 years.
I've already got cables up the ass coming out of my towers in the way of KONA cards, Fibre cables, USB, eSATA, etc. If I could run 6 TB cables into a rack and have the Pro sitting on my desk where I can easily unplug and put it into my backpack, I'd MUCH rather have that.
And I don't know any professionals who don't edit off an external SAN or Fibre RAID, not in my house anymore. All my stuff is external so I can move it around instead of having to pull out drives.
This machine is clearly for video professionals, maybe audio professionals. Just listen to the latest "Vector" Podcast with Rene Richie to get a very good concept of why.
The lesson here is: Speak for yourself. Not all pros are as stuck in their old ways as you are.
Maybe I'm not a "true" Pro user... but this is the first time I'm considering a Pro machine because my multi-tasking is actually reaching the limits of my MBP.
With that said, I'm still not sure what the fuss is all about. With Apple stuff, I tend to only open it up when I first get it to upgrade the RAM and the hard drive to a SSD. After that, I only open it up if things are breaking or if a hard drive fails and I need to replace it.
At home, my storage has moved to a RAIDED NAS solution since most internal storage can no longer handle the amount of media files that I have. It would be nice if I can access this via the cloud or FTP, which I can... and if things break, it'd be as easy as popping out a hard drive and swapping it vs. having to open up one of Apple's machines.
If I actually go with a Thunderbolt solution, I'm sure the speeds will be fast enough that I will no longer care if it's external or internal.
Anyway, I do see this change as being the norm and I welcome it. The way it's setup now, maybe this means if things break, you can walk into an Apple store and they can just hand you a new one after transferring your files or swapping your hard drive. I welcome efficiency even if it's as small as going to the store and getting things resolved in one trip instead of two.
With that said, I'm still not sure what the fuss is all about. With Apple stuff, I tend to only open it up when I first get it to upgrade the RAM and the hard drive to a SSD. After that, I only open it up if things are breaking or if a hard drive fails and I need to replace it.
At home, my storage has moved to a RAIDED NAS solution since most internal storage can no longer handle the amount of media files that I have. It would be nice if I can access this via the cloud or FTP, which I can... and if things break, it'd be as easy as popping out a hard drive and swapping it vs. having to open up one of Apple's machines.
If I actually go with a Thunderbolt solution, I'm sure the speeds will be fast enough that I will no longer care if it's external or internal.
Anyway, I do see this change as being the norm and I welcome it. The way it's setup now, maybe this means if things break, you can walk into an Apple store and they can just hand you a new one after transferring your files or swapping your hard drive. I welcome efficiency even if it's as small as going to the store and getting things resolved in one trip instead of two.
Yeah. To be fair, it didn't perform with quite the same improvement in other benches, and actually lost some real world benches.
Tom's Hardware finished with:
Hey if it ends up being a 7970 Xfire then that is great. I don't want it to suck, y'know? Maybe others do. I either want the nMP to be effing wonderful or complete failure (ala' Cube) and revert back to the previous tower state. We will all need something in the next 5 years regardless. Worst case for me is it to be moderately OK at some things (ie all Apple SW) and terrible at everything else with zero upgrade path and with no 3rd party extensibility in sight. Which it probably wont be as it will just use all the laptop peripherals.
Just because you can move away from physical media it doesn't mean that your customers may want to.
True, and I like the convenience of an included optical drive. But when you can get a good cheap external drive, is it really a big deal?
Tell me, have you ever used a Blu-Ray player professionally? Occasional use of an optical drive hardly qualifies as professional use...
Just because the mac pro doesn't have a optical drive doesn't mean it's not a pro machine, either.
This OP sounds like a complaining n00b who likes to rip Blu-Rays.
I don't know of any professionals in my industry that actually use DVD's, let alone blu-rays.... And I work in the entertainment industry.
When we're given a project, we're given assets digitally. They don't give us a Blu-Ray to rip lol
So unless you're in the professional business of ripping/watching Blu-Rays, there is little need for a Blu-Ray player, IMO
If anyone likes the added convenience of having an optical drive, in this day and age (hence my original question to the OP), then buying an external optical drive sounds pretty convenient to me...
Last edited:
I'll go slowly for you Sparky.....
Your "industry" isn't the entire market for the MP. Let me repeat that because it is important.
Your "industry" isn't the entire market for the MP.
Just because the business you work for is B2B doesn't mean that every "professional" business does B2B. If the customer says "I want the finished product on Blue-Ray." You have two options, give them what they want, or the business goes to someone else.
Lots of "professional" businesses outside of your narrow viewpoint use MPs.
For the company you work for, the nMP may be nirvana. For what I do, the nMP is a fantastic advertisement for both Dell & HP workstations. Many more horses for a lot less money.
It all depends on what your workflow looks like.
We're a post facility. We burn Blu-rays with fair regularity. Our filmmaker clients want them for festival submissions, etc. But an external burner is still way more convenient, as we can move it between machines to keep mundane tasks like disc burning from interfering with the client work going on in our edit/color suites.
i'm willing to bet that most professional workflows don't involve burning blu-rays... sparky
I wish you could see the irony of your post, especially in a thread where yourself and others claim that the nMP is not a Pro machine because it does not suit their specific needs and workflows.