Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sorry, but Gizmodo is a left-leaning site. Here is the source. I prefer the center or non-biased site. Sorry, your source doesn't count.

How about the other two? Facts are facts. It doesn't matter who is left or right leaning.

If a SINGLE account gets suspended, then free speech is not absolute. There are no exceptions. One example: Jack Sweeny isn't allowed to say what he wants on Twitter. He was the first to go, personally because of Musk, because he hurt his snowflake feelings. Waah.

Hypocrisy is the ultimate sin.
 
How about the other two? Facts are facts. It doesn't matter who is left or right leaning.

If a SINGLE account gets suspended, then free speech is not absolute. There are no exceptions.

One example: Jack Sweeny isn't allowed to say what he wants on Twitter. He was the first to go, personally because of Musk, because he hurt his snowflake feelings. Waah.

As for my view, no social media sites should be for-profit. If there is a profit-motive, of any sort, they are biased.

It's probably for a good reason why he got suspended. Source from reuters.com. "...saying his son had been mistakenly followed by a "crazy stalker". By the way, Reuters is Centered, and the majority of communities agreed. Here is the source.

The other two are also left-leaning. Keep in mind that I don't always rely on Wikipedia. It's also the left-leaning too. Here is a good example:

Wikipedia blocked users from revising its “recession” page after visitors to the site engaged in a frantic editing war over the definition of the term, which is being disputed by the Biden administration following the latest economic data showing a drop in GDP.

"Wikipedia changed the definition of recession to favor the Biden regime and then locked the page” tweeted right-leaning social media personality Mike Cernovich.
 
It's probably for a good reason why he got suspended. Source from reuters.com. "...saying his son had been mistakenly followed by a "crazy stalker". By the way, Reuters is Centered, and the majority of communities agreed. Here is the source.

The other two are also left-leaning. Keep in mind that I don't always rely on Wikipedia. It's also the left-leaning too. Here is a good example:



"Wikipedia changed the definition of recession to favor the Biden regime and then locked the page” tweeted right-leaning social media personality Mike Cernovich.

Absolutist: a person who holds absolute principles in political, philosophical, or theological matters.

Musk is a hypocrite. I don't care what his "reasons" are.

Oh well, Twitter sucked before Elon Musk. It sucks now and it will suck in the future.
 
Threads will be fine - it's its a "partner" to instagram (and Facebook)... its not meant to replace anything on the Meta side... they all work as a team. its set up to go when the inevitable happens... Twitter (X) Finally dies... and that will absolutely happen and likely sooner than later.
 
I don't care either way, personally; Twitter and Threads both suck, for the way I use social media. I don't want to see or be seen by anyone other than those I personally follow, and I only follow people I personally know.
MR is the extent of my social media experience. It’s all I need. 😉
 
Ribbentrop would have concurred.

And LoL bleating out “sheep” as an insult is kind of an own goal guy.

Also worth noting, although musk is the largest individual shareholder w 9%, he’s neither the majority or largest single shareholder in Twitter. He’s only running things because majority holders let him. (And sometimes I wonder if they do because they are playing for capital-losses to offset gains somewhere else.)
Musk bought 9% of Twitter in spring of 2022, but that was before the acquisition deal. As of the time he renamed Twitter so that it's technically no longer called Twitter (but will always be known as Twitter), he owned about 79% of Twitter.
 
No one important is using it. Mostly advertisers and celebrities part of the MICC command and control apparatus. Twitter is still better and actually has content, and unlike the sheep, I don't leave a platform just because the man who bought it is a legend with balls.
Can you tell me what it is that makes you think he has balls?
 
Meta doesn't claim to be a "free speech absolutist", which I would consider as even one single person/account suspended as hypocritical.

It's weird... I've been using the internet since 1996, and I have never once been banned or suspended from any service, subreddit, facebook group, forum or otherwise....Seems to happen a lot with some people.

Personally my issue with twitter no is not free speech absolutism, it's the excess amount of chaff that appears any time I actually want to find something. It's like trying to fix a leaky toilet and every time I try a bowl fool of rancid poop leaks all over the floor. Although I was never much of a Twitter user (more of an occasional lurker), I'm still trying to figure out what the next big thing is . Threads? Blusky? Mastadon? I'm very much in the "F** Twitter" camp, but haven't found a replacement.
 
Restricting tags to one per message may make sense to avoid silly long lists of tags, but it brings back classification in a single dimension.
 
Threads is fine if you like the Instagram crowd I guess. Bluesky and Mastodon user here. My academic, science and writer crowd are on the former, geeks on the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cflem
I don't understand what this has to do with Macs or Apple in general.

People use Threads on Macs and other Apple devices, Threads is currently listed as #2 among “Top Free Apps” in Apple's App Store (and #1 in the "Social Networking" category), Apple has a presence on Threads, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.