Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,781
38,371


Social network TikTok today asked the U.S. Supreme Court to temporarily halt an imminent ban as TikTok waits for the appeal process to play out. TikTok is set to be banned from U.S. app stores starting on January 19 because parent company ByteDance did not sell TikTok to a non-Chinese company as mandated by a bill in April.

tiktok-logo.jpg


TikTok is calling on the Supreme Court to hear its appeal, and it is sticking with the free speech argument that the lower appeals court denied. The petition that TikTok submitted to the Supreme Court claims that Congress has "enacted a massive and unprecedented speech restriction," and that TikTok is one of the "most popular and important venues for communication" in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers gave ByteDance nine months to sell TikTok to a company not located in China, but ByteDance has maintained that doing so would be impossible. ByteDance says that it is not able to give the TikTok source code to a new owner because it would take years for engineers to become familiar enough with it to perform routine maintenance, and ByteDance also does not plan to allow a third-party company to access its TikTok algorithm.


Further, China has said that it will firmly oppose any sale of the TikTok app, and any sale would need to be approved by the Chinese government. Per the terms of the bill, if TikTok is not sold off, app store owners Google, Apple, and others will be required to stop distributing the app in January. If TikTok is ultimately banned, users who have downloaded the app already would be able to continue to use it so long as it stayed functional, but there would be no distribution method for getting the app in the United States.

U.S. lawmakers want TikTok sold to a company outside of China over concerns that the Chinese government could force ByteDance to hand over information from users in the United States, plus there have been suggestions that China could use TikTok to spread political propaganda.

It is possible that the ban on TikTok could be lifted or delayed by President-elect Donald Trump. According to CNBC, Trump told reporters on Monday that his administration will "take a look at TikTok." Trump tried to ban TikTok when he was in office, but said this year that he opposes the law that Congress passed.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: TikTok Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Temporarily Block Upcoming January Ban
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SFjohn
this move was expected. Question is whether or not the SC will her them.
The incoming POTUS made some comments today liking TikTok and getting some of the votes of younger(ish) people ...

A big mess, popcorn is on sale at Costco ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glideslope
TikTok just needs to make a deal with Apple and Google so whenever someone buys a new device, the app will already be installed.

U2 did something similar back in the day with Apple.
If this is a troll bait, VERY well done.

If not, I myself and literally everybody I spoke with HATED that little stunt from Apple. I use Spotify now out of anger.
 
If this is a troll bait, VERY well done.

If not, I myself and literally everybody I spoke with HATED that little stunt from Apple. I use Spotify now out of anger.

Sad to say but i think it already comes pre-installed on a lot of android phones.

Even if google were to be forced to remove it; would say; the samsung store be forced to?
Tiktok will continue to make and update their app for the rest of the world; so it wouldn't be hard to sideload it.

It'd be like the fortnight fiasco again; people will just find ways around it.


Ironically, apple could be the biggest loser in this; if tiktok has truly reached "killer app" status; then not having it available when your competitors can; is a big handicap.
 
I would love to be a fly on the wall at TikTok's headquarters conference room right about now. Imagine the tension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frumpywumpy
I understand the slippery slope here, all the other major social networks whore up data as well, but there are inexorable ties between Chinese companies and the Chinese Communist Party which are of concern. Perhaps not for Joe Public but for anyone employed by the US Government, including military folks and contractors, this is a major concern.
 
Last edited:
TikTok just needs to make a deal with Apple and Google so whenever someone buys a new device, the app will already be installed.

U2 did something similar back in the day with Apple.
Couldn't TikTok's servers simply be blocked at an ISP level?

Yes I know VPN's exist. But it would certainly lessen the appeal of the app. Trying to change your country settings on TikTok from another ones IP is a complete PITA, so you'd end up with content targeted to another country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
If the government has proof that TikTok is doing something nefarious, they need to present it openly to the public for any and all to see, without restriction.

This behind-doors "trust us" legislation just doesn’t work for me, nor does "well, china is doing it too!, waaa!"...that's all the more to reason to not block it.

No tit-for-tat.
 
The issue it seems is not that 3rd parties can siphon up user data for their own nefarious gain … it’s that they can do it for free, without having to pay a data broker for the privilege :cool:
 
ByteDance says that it is not able to give the TikTok source code to a new owner because it would take years for engineers to become familiar enough with it to perform routine maintenance
Why would they give a crap about what a third party does with the software they just bought.

Someone buys my car, I don't care if they know how to drive.

ByteDance also does not plan to allow a third-party company to access its TikTok algorithm.
What they are really worried about is allowing access to the secret sauce. Maybe it could be targeted back at gullible Chinese kids.
 
This was a stupid law. I have a much better compromise. The US government should block US/Canadian/Mexican cloud providers from serving the content. This means TikTok would still work, but it would have to connect to servers in Asia/Europe etc.

This would serve both sides. It would preserve free speech, but it would punish apps like TikTok that are basically vectors for national security threats by slowing down the connection speed and latency since it has to reach overseas to access the content.

Countries like China that block US websites/apps from operating in their own country should be punished and any website from China like TikTok should be similarly restricted in terms of lacking access to cloud servers/providers. But we will NEVER block websites at the US government level.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: H3boy
Couldn't TikTok's servers simply be blocked at an ISP level?

Yes I know VPN's exist. But it would certainly lessen the appeal of the app. Trying to change your country settings on TikTok from another ones IP is a complete PITA, so you'd end up with content targeted to another country.

Long ago, Japanese based websites and companies were nefarious for requiring someone to sign up with a local phone number or a local .jp email address, which you needed to create from a local IP address. These days it’s a bit different in how you can go about it but it would still be a pain enough that many folks would just not go through the process unless they REALLY wanted to be on the platform
 
It is possible that the ban on TikTok could be lifted or delayed by President-elect Donald Trump. According to CNBC, Trump told reporters on Monday that his administration will "take a look at TikTok." Trump tried to ban TikTok when he was in office, but said this year that he opposes the law that Congress passed.
Except that the law that was passed by congress was veto proof majority so that orange haired guy can’t do anything with usual procedure.

And SCOTUS will likely ignore this case and let the ruling stand for sake of national security.

If he decides to bypass congress and SCOTUS and make it up on his own, then he just set up a super dangerous precedent that POTUS is the ultimate power and can override the congress, something that can only dictators would do.
 
Except that the law that was passed by congress was veto proof majority so that orange haired guy can’t do anything with usual procedure.

And SCOTUS will likely ignore this case and let the ruling stand for sake of national security.

If he decides to bypass congress and SCOTUS and make it up on his own, then he just set up a super dangerous precedent that POTUS is the ultimate power and can override the congress, something that can only dictators would do.

Just like SCOTUS telling you that you can’t forgive student loans, but you ignore them and go ahead and do it any way? Something that only dictators would do.
 
JD Vance threatened to dissolve NATO if Europe tries to regulate Twitter, meanwhile we’re out here banning TikTok just because the algorithm isn’t doing our government’s bidding.

JD Vance is the vice-president. He doesn't have any authority to do anything accept vote in the senate.

That said, I agree.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.