Haha...you're funny. The 3G just came out and you're talking about the next iPhone already?
Why not?
Heck, right after the first model came out, people were already talking abou the next iPhone. A year goes by very quickly in phone model time.
Haha...you're funny. The 3G just came out and you're talking about the next iPhone already?
Why not?
Heck, right after the first model came out, people were already talking abou the next iPhone. A year goes by very quickly in phone model time.
People might not have such a negative reaction to the discussion if there weren't 50+ threads on this and very much related topics already (can we say 32GB iPhone 3G).
I'd agree if it was a reply pointing out that "Hey there's 50 posts on this already".
But that's very different from someone uselessly asking, "Why would you want to talk about X topic?"
There are so many people here who give kneejerk negative responses along the line of "Well, I don't want to (talk about it / get that option / use that feature)" as if they were the only people on the planet.
If they're not interested in a topic, they should just move along![]()
Holy sh*t... my Time Machine must have malfunctioned.How else could I be reading this thread already?
because this is what the iPhone forum has become, noobs asking stupid questions and aged member attacking them for it.
Just wondering with the new iPhone being subsidized and all will the new iPhone come in 24 months (US) or 18-24 (UK, Personal or Business). If they waited till' the end of the US contracts, the people in the UK which brought at the beginning will be waiting 6 months for the new one. Or If they go with the UK 18 months the people in the US will have 6 months locked into a contract before they can get their hands on it. And if they release it before all of these, the carriers are gonna miss out because there not making all the money back from the subsidiaries.
1 iPhone per year, every year; just like the iPods in September.
No. The first gen iPhone was not subsidized, plain and simple. It had nothing to do with equipment specs, rather AT&T wasn't out subsidy costs so they allowed the upgrade.
I realize this is the scenario we're faced with as it stands, but is Apple really going to sit by and watch as literally millions of people skip buying the next version of the phone because they're locked into a subsidized contract...especially after 2 years of customers becoming accustomed to buying a new iPhone as they please?
Apple has to come out with a new iphone in 12 - 16 months since the launch of its iphone 3g if it wants to stay on top of the market... currently iphone is the 2nd best selling smartphone next to blackberry then coming in 3rd are windows based phones. Its a fast paced business environment and apple has to adapt to the market on annual basis if it wants to continue on its upward climb
maybe a funky way to add addition memory via an SD card.
Yes, they will.
The portion of their target consumers who are locked into a subsidized 3G contract AND who will not be eligible for an upgrade next summer AND will not be willing to pay full price for the upgraded model represent a small portion of the market Apples wants. This means that it will be worth it to them to release another model (or two - not counting different memory) to reach everyone else, especially customers who don't have an iPhone. In order to reach these customers they are going to need to catch up to other smartphones on the market in a hurry. Don't forget that plenty of people paid the full price for the first generation, some of them even paying $175 early termination fees on top of that.
Also remember that AT&T allows upgrades every 12 months for any contract that is $99.99 or more per month for a single line - not that far-fetched when the data itself is $30 per month. The target customer is really the new customers. You don't have to win over current customers, just keep them satisfied enough to stay. Do you really think there will be that many 3G users that will be upset enough over a not being eligible for a $200 subsidy that they will stop using the iPhone? Far fewer, if any than those that have already ditched the 3G due to the numerous problems.
I could see a revision in a year or less. One thing to remember is that these phones are becoming mini-computers and will eventually be on the same upgrade cycle as a macbook pro or something. I could see Apple wanting to put better processors in them. One of the possibilities are specialty iphones for people who have a specific purpose in mind. It would be cool if there was a gaming iphone for instance and then one more for business use. I could easily see someone getting a phone and attaching a keyboard and monitor and running Photoshop on it.
I know I'm dreaming.But the potential is there. Its one of the reasons I'm sticking with the iphone for awhile even though its a beta device full of problems. Then again, I think that's what many companies are thinking(including Google) we'll see who does it best.
really? AT&T allows upgrades every year for contract that is $99.99 and above? can you please direct me to the website (linK) that says this. Thank you
I think this raises a valid point. If Apple comes out with a new phone before the majority of 3G owner's contracts are up and the carriers don't want to eat the remaining subsidy costs, the only people who are going to jump on a new phone next summer are people with money to burn, diehard fanatics, and those who haven't bought an iPhone to date. This could mean Apple might sell considerably fewer phones than if there were no subsidy to consider. And it becomes an unbreakable cycle; Apple can't sell us a new phone every year, unless the carriers lose money on subsidies.
Yes, they will.
The portion of their target consumers who are locked into a subsidized 3G contract AND who will not be eligible for an upgrade next summer AND will not be willing to pay full price for the upgraded model represent a small portion of the market Apples wants.
I'm not so sure about that. I think it's quite the opposite. The portion of the market who is willing to spend several hundreds on a new iPhone every year is not as large as you may think. Millions more subsidized 3G's have been sold in one quarter than the original iPhone sold in it's entire lifespan. 3G sales dwarf the first gen. Not to mention that not only will they have to pay a fully unsubsidized price, but unless AT&T changes their terms of service, they will also have to pay an ETF. An unsubsidized 16GB 3G is what, $600? Maybe more? That, plus the ETF and you are looking at damn near a $1000 for an iPhone. You really think people are going to be climbing over walls to fork over that kind of dough a year after buying a 3G?
This means that it will be worth it to them to release another model (or two - not counting different memory) to reach everyone else, especially customers who don't have an iPhone. In order to reach these customers they are going to need to catch up to other smartphones on the market in a hurry. Don't forget that plenty of people paid the full price for the first generation, some of them even paying $175 early termination fees on top of that.
They already have caught up and over taken all smartphone, actually, all cell phones from the BB to the RAZR. And just because people payed full price and an ETF once, doesn't mean they are going to do it every year.
Also remember that AT&T allows upgrades every 12 months for any contract that is $99.99 or more per month for a single line - not that far-fetched when the data itself is $30 per month. The target customer is really the new customers. You don't have to win over current customers, just keep them satisfied enough to stay. Do you really think there will be that many 3G users that will be upset enough over a not being eligible for a $200 subsidy that they will stop using the iPhone? Far fewer, if any than those that have already ditched the 3G due to the numerous problems.