But there is a new mini. It's called the HP Z2
http://store.hp.com/us/en/cv/z2mini...cd77fd&aoid=35252&pbid=78888&siteid=Skimlinks
http://store.hp.com/us/en/cv/z2mini...cd77fd&aoid=35252&pbid=78888&siteid=Skimlinks
With as much as Apple has locked it down I'll hazard a guess and say the path for the Mini is to become the first iOS based 'computer' for Apple.
I'd be ok with that if they merged it with the Apple TV so I could surf the web, check email, while keeping the Apple TV ecosystem of apps.
Other than that, I believe the Mini will be gone at some point in the near future.
The role of iOS computer is already with the iPad Pro. I can't see Apple doing anything in a desktop format with ARM CPUs for now.
Does that come with a Pascal compiler like my old Apple II? What about C or even Apple's own Swift?The role of iOS computer is already with the iPad Pro.
Any new Mac Mini is useless unless it can drive the 4K or 5K LG monitors at 60 Hz. It seems to me like they'd rather reserve that for a Mac Pro with dGPU, part of the reason I think the Mac Mini may be discontinued.
The internals of other mini PCs, in today's world, are light-years ahead of Apple's Mini. You can get SFF PCs with quad-core CPUs, gaming-quality GPUs, plenty of (socketed!) RAM, vast amounts of internal storage, and much improved I/O ports and all for roughly the same price. Modern SFF machines are more than a match for high-end iMacs!
I see things similarly. 2017 is their last shot at desktops. If nothing is released this year, it's all over, both for the mini and the pro.Yeah, the most interesting aspect about Apple isn't their annual iPhone/iPad updates; those are predictable and boring. It's the neglect of their computers. It's fascinating. And 2017 is Tim Cook's year of reckoning. No more "great products in the pipeline" BS. Either a kick-ass desktop computer drops this year, or the ruse is up.
I remember that article. Word of mouth is such an important part, especially because it's not quantifiable.In my post above I started to mention an article that I thought summed things up really well, but didn't have URL. I've since found it, and it expressed my opinion on Apple no longer building products with the target of delighting "elite" users, who have an oversized influence on others and opinion.
Apple’s 2016 in review - https://chuqui.com/2017/01/apples-2016-in-review/
I think the guy is ex-Apple. It's a long read, and doesn't even mention the Mini, but worth it. Some choice quotes:
"But here’s the problem: sitting in this niche of excluded users are some of Apple’s strongest supporters, the influencers that create word of mouth..."
"It might make sense from a purely spreadsheet view, but this feels to me like a penny wise and pound foolish decision that puts at risk the halo effect and influencer networks they’ve put so much effort into building"
"...the product configurations seem designed by what will fit the biggest part of the user base with the fewest configuration options..."
"...Spreadsheets can tell you where the sweet spots in the market are and how to hit them, but they struggle at finding and bringing forward strategic areas that also need coverage"
And so on...
Yep. Apple (mac division) seems like it has returned to the 1996 era... lost.
Yes.
I wonder what the 13k employes are going to do when half of the hardware and software have been killed off.
They get laid off?
1) Apple has moved away from the middle of just about every market they are/were in
2) Apple basically only has a single development team that's badly over-stressed in designing new products
3) Apple is valuing raw profit margin on each product above anything anymore, canceling products that don't match up
4) The Mini doesn't sell much and mostly doesn't have a good profit margin
5) The Mini doesn't represent anything for the future of the company
6) An iPhone/iPad with usb-c could have a charging dock that includes a usb-c hub with multiple ports. Add external monitor/peripheral support and the iOS device and it should easily be able to replace a Mini
7) iOS app development is condensing around a small number of large companies that can easily afford a MBpro, so they don't even need it for that
8) There's less than no information out about any possible replacement... except about how the iPad is the new computer
I see Apple killing the Mini and any possible Mac below $1000. They don't want to play in that low margin area anymore and any Mac there is potentially future competition with the iOS devices
Apple could work with DELL / HP / lenovo. To have server / workstations / desktops / gamer systems that can run mac os and let ATI / nvidia do the video drivers with there own updates.The current Mini (maybe with an incremental spec bump) seems to fill the "cheap" category OK.
I think what most people here are pining for is the option of a powerful Mac Mini that they had pre-2012. The problem there, though, is that it's a small, niche market that would be expensive to develop - requiring lots of bespoke components and clever cooling systems. Rivals like the Intel Skull Canyon NUC are already pretty expensive for the power (and they lack the Mini's killer feature of having an internal power supply which makes the cooling even more fun).
I think that what they should do is re-visit the "xMac" affordable/expandable mini-tower concept. The argument against this, was that it would cannibalise other sales. I think that was quite true - years ago - nowadays though, most consumers want ultrabooks, all-in-ones and convertibles - the only people buying towers/headless systems are those of us who have a reason for needing that format.
The advantage of an xMac is that it would be dirt cheap to design, produce and keep up to date - just a regular MicroATX or MiniITX motherboard in a nicer-than-average case (they could even outsource it). It wouldn't sell in great quantity, the point for Apple would be the strategic one of keeping power-users and enthusiasts happy - because the way Apple are going at the moment, they'll soon be jumping ship to Windows and Linux.
The other alternative would be an "official" Hackintosh program: say, $150 for a license to run the current OS X version on 3rd party hardware (strictly not for resale), access to an official list of supported hardware (at chipset level) and the security to know that you won't get bricked, lose updates or have your Apple ID suspended because Apple suddenly decide to crack down on Hackintoshing.
Trouble is, both of these involve the top brass of Apple seeing the value of keeping the power-users happy: they may be a minority, but they're the ones that provide unofficial support to friends family and colleagues, evangelise Mac to others, keep Macs alive in PC-biassed workplaces, write software & create a market for specialist software on the Mac.
Unfortunately, it looks like the current top brass lack any genuine enthusiasm for Macs. We all understand management speak: if they need to say "The Mac is very important to us" it can only mean "We don't give a wet slap about the Mac and will be dumping it as soon as we find a good exit strategy".
I doubt they'll do this as their recent maneuvers suggest boneheads in upper management.
My work iMac is starting to get nasty image retention issues after as little as 5 minutes of a static window or screen. I would love to replace it with an Apple computer, but it seems they don't want me to do that.
PC desktops are pretty much dead except for gaming which is moving close to laptops also. Just plug in a bigger display if you need it is the philosophy now whether at the office or at home.
Very true.I bought my 2011 (discrete graphics) and 2012 (quad core) while my 2009 and 2010 models were still active. Skipped the non-user-upgradeable 2014. The iMac is useless to me, as a mac mini travels with me, ultra long haul, twice a year.I own 2 mini's and if they came out with real horsepower new products, I would own 2 more. The market is there, the will is not.
I am at a lost what to do next in replacing in the near-future my Refurbished MM(Late 2012), 2.5GHz, 16GB Ram, 500GB HD and my other Refurbished MM(Late 2014), 2.8GHz,8GB Ram, 256SSD.
I have been very satisfied with both of these Computers in meeting my present computer needs but "what-next" in buying a OS X Desktop machine which will last for the next 3 or 4 more years??