Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,366
10,126
Atlanta, GA
I have lots of Apple products, but not a laptop yet. And I plan on purchasing one very soon. My usage consists of mostly basic tasks including Youtube, Netflix, Spotify, Safari with multiple tabs open, office documents and light photo editing. I plan to keep this machine, likely an MBA, for five years. Based on my usage and length of time I anticipate to keep my machine, does it make sense to upgrade to 16MG of RAM? I have a limited budget, but will spend the extra money if upgrading to 16GB will help to future proof my purchase. Thank you!
The upgrade is slightly more than $3 per month. I would do it if I were you.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
He said his usage consists also of photo editing. (I assume Photoshop CC)
Personally on my iMac 21.5 late 2009 (E8600) (macOS High Sierra) with Chrome multiple tabs open, Spotify, office suite and Photoshop CC I need always more than 8 GB of Ram (in that machine in fact I have installed 16 GB).
I have no idea how you can do all the things with only 4 GB of Ram.

He said "light" photo-editing and I see no reason to assume Photoshop. I've used GIMP for many years on my old MBA with Chrome, YouTube, MS Office, etc. open too and never had an issue with 4GB RAM. If you don't believe me, then oh well! Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have more, but to claim 16GB is "essential" for basic computing is just wrong.
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,193
524
He said "light" photo-editing and I see no reason to assume Photoshop. I've used GIMP for many years on my old MBA with Chrome, YouTube, MS Office, etc. open too and never had an issue with 4GB RAM. If you don't believe me, then oh well! Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have more, but to claim 16GB is "essential" for basic computing is just wrong.
it depend on os also . 4gb still good on old os but not high siera
 

Maconplasma

Cancelled
Sep 15, 2020
2,489
2,215
He said "light" photo-editing and I see no reason to assume Photoshop. I've used GIMP for many years on my old MBA with Chrome, YouTube, MS Office, etc. open too and never had an issue with 4GB RAM. If you don't believe me, then oh well! Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have more, but to claim 16GB is "essential" for basic computing is just wrong.
For many Photoshop is the only one they've heard of and the established brand name makes it the easy go to for photo editing whether they will use it occasionally or full time. I personally use Pixelmator but not everyone has heard of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alien3dx

Killbynumbers

macrumors 6502a
May 29, 2019
578
565
Nonsense. I could easily do all that he described with my old 2012 MacBook Air with 4GB of Ram. 8GB is plenty. That being said, if the OP has money to burn and feels better about it, then 16GB definitely won't hurt.
I don't do anything on my 16" MBP wit 16GB but internet stuff and there are times when I open a tab, I can really tell the page is struggling to open. It will just stutter and take 10 minutes to completely load. If I close all my tabs, the page opens instantly. There are times when I have 16-20 tabs open and I can tell.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
@usagora One of my favorite phenomena on this forum is seeing people rave about the lightening speed of their 10 years+ old macbooks, where 4GB RAM is PLENTY, 2 cores, 1.8GHz is MORE THAN ENOUGH and lags DO NOT EXIST, but inexplicably their old laptops become overheating slow pieces of garbage the moment they touch a shiny new AS computer. I'll be awaiting your inevitable posts ;)

Hmm, one of MY favorite phenomenons on forums is when people completely twist other people's posts like you just did here. I never said my 2012 MBA was "lightning fast" or never lagged. The OP said all his tasks consist of BASIC COMPUTING and that is precisely what the BASE model Macs are designed to handle and then some! I've done all the things the OP described on that 2012 MBA and never recall one crash or any other issue due to lack of memory.

Like I said, if you can and want to, by all means max our your RAM. But to claim 16GB is "necessary" for basic computing is simply false. Sorry!

P.S. Just realized I need to update my signature, but I just recently bought the base model M1 MBA. Not because my 2012 MBA was slow but because it can't be upgraded to Big Sur (when I have a Mac that can't be upgraded to the latest OS, that's usually when I'll buy a new one as my "daily driver"). I could have easily afforded to upgrade the RAM, but since I had no issues with the base config on my old MBA, I opted to save $200 and stick with the config that was already twice that of my current notebook that wasn't having any issues doing all the BASIC computing tasks I needed to do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jeremiah256

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
For many Photoshop is the only one they've heard of and the established brand name makes it the easy go to for photo editing whether they will use it occasionally or full time. I personally use Pixelmator but not everyone has heard of it.

I have have a hard time believing someone who is debating spending $200 to upgrade the RAM is going to spend $21/month for Photoshop for "light photo editing." Heck, you can even use Photos for the basic stuff.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
I don't do anything on my 16" MBP wit 16GB but internet stuff and there are times when I open a tab, I can really tell the page is struggling to open. It will just stutter and take 10 minutes to completely load. If I close all my tabs, the page opens instantly. There are times when I have 16-20 tabs open and I can tell.

I've had that happen occasionally on my iMac with 64GB RAM. Sometimes you'll have a webpage that's trying to load all kinds of junk or something and/or it could be a temporary network bottleneck. I don't think RAM is the issue (otherwise that would mean 64GB isn't enough for web-browsing, LOL!!!)
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
it depend on os also . 4gb still good on old os but not high siera

My 4GB MBA is running Catalina just fine actually.

1615528547087.png
 

Dockland

macrumors 6502a
Feb 26, 2021
968
8,944
Sweden
He said "light" photo-editing and I see no reason to assume Photoshop. I've used GIMP for many years on my old MBA with Chrome, YouTube, MS Office, etc. open too and never had an issue with 4GB RAM. If you don't believe me, then oh well! Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have more, but to claim 16GB is "essential" for basic computing is just wrong.

Well, it varies from user case to user case. If there were a 32/64/128GB option for the Mac mini I would had gone with that. Without a doubt. I can run Gentoo Linux on 512MB RAM but it wouldn't be a pleasant experience :)
 

crevalic

Suspended
May 17, 2011
83
98
Well, it varies from user case to user case. If there were a 32/64/128GB option for the Mac mini I would had gone with that. Without a doubt. I can run Gentoo Linux on 512MB RAM but it wouldn't be a pleasant experience :)
Exactly. Not having enough RAM doesn't mean your computer will burst into flames and stop working, most of the time it just means you will have a bad and slow experience.
 

Andrea Filippini

macrumors 6502
Jun 27, 2020
394
339
Tuscany, Italy
He said "light" photo-editing and I see no reason to assume Photoshop. I've used GIMP for many years on my old MBA with Chrome, YouTube, MS Office, etc. open too and never had an issue with 4GB RAM. If you don't believe me, then oh well! Like I said, it doesn't hurt to have more, but to claim 16GB is "essential" for basic computing is just wrong.
Even if you don't use Photoshop for photo editing and you choose a different software, according to his daily tasks you need in any case at least 8 GB of RAM.
 

AJB1971

macrumors 6502
Jun 23, 2011
452
432
If you’re on a limited budget then I would opt for the 8GB model as it’s sufficient for your current needs and likely to be that way for the next few years. You can always sell the device if it turns out that it’s no longer capable of doing what you want.

The main thing for me would be getting a good deal and, in my experience, that’s far easier on an 8GB model than a 16GB one. The amount you save can be used for a future upgrade, if necessary.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
define "fine" by showing your activity monitor with open browser instead

Look, and this goes for everyone giving me grief here: If it worked like crap, why the HELL would I not just say so? What's in it for me to LIE about it? Look at my signature - it's not like I can't afford higher-end Macs and thus am doing a sour-grapes routine to make myself feel better. I own what you see there PLUS a 2012 iMac and MBA (removed those from signature since it was getting too long and they're no longer my "main" desktop/laptop combo). I don't need to post a freaking activity monitor screenshot. I can simply tell you I've been using it with multiple Chrome tabs, GIMP, GarageBand, MS Office (including PowerPoints with TONS of animations, many simultaneous), QuickTime, etc. without ever feeling like it was choking or even starting too. Now, I don't normally do all those things at the same time (no need to), but I have done a FEW of those things at the same time and experience no perceivable issues. I guess maybe it helps that it has an SSD for memory swapping or something. I don't really know nor care what it's doing in the background because it just works.

That will be my final comment on the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brookter1

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,193
524
For many Photoshop is the only one they've heard of and the established brand name makes it the easy go to for photo editing whether they will use it occasionally or full time. I personally use Pixelmator but not everyone has heard of it.
using pixelmator on m1 . even not full perfect like photoshop at least can do some minor editing like ts wanted .
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,193
524
Look, and this goes for everyone giving me grief here: If it worked like crap, why the HELL would I not just say so? What's in it for me to LIE about it? Look at my signature - it's not like I can't afford higher-end Macs and thus am doing a sour-grapes routine to make myself feel better. I own what you see there PLUS a 2012 iMac and MBA (removed those from signature since it was getting too long and they're no longer my "main" desktop/laptop combo). I don't need to post a freaking activity monitor screenshot. I can simply tell you I've been using it with multiple Chrome tabs, GIMP, GarageBand, MS Office (including PowerPoints with TONS of animations, many simultaneous), QuickTime, etc. without ever feeling like it was choking or even starting too. Now, I don't normally do all those things at the same time (no need to), but I have done a FEW of those things at the same time and experience no perceivable issues. I guess maybe it helps that it has an SSD for memory swapping or something. I don't really know nor care what it's doing in the background because it just works.

That will be my final comment on the matter.

It depend on usage, let see your graphic card tol 1.5gb ram and other usage will be 2.5gb . It is smooth on my old 2011 ssd on base model 4gb and basic activity

Answer :Yes

What if the poster have mutiple layer of photoshop and running spotify ?

Answer : yes and medium and extra heat

This answer are on old model, but you dont have to think much as m1 is

1. No heat
2. Performance not bad for base model 8gb( i purchase one )
3. Yeah, you can open mutiple apps one time .

Sometimes we need to think ahead as we dont know the real usage of ts and wanted to give peace of mind purchasing product which may dont have genius nearby .
 

hakr100

macrumors 6502a
Mar 1, 2011
967
113
East Coast
I'm planning to order a MacBook Air sometime this month, and I've decided that I'll blow a couple hundred on upgrading to 16GB of RAM. I don't know what software I'll want to use in the future, so I think 16 GB will cover me. I just sold my 2013 MacBook Air that had 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD. The SSD never blinked. I'm pretty sure I'll stay with the 256 GB SSD on the new machine; I never filled more than 100 GB on the old MacBook Air, and I store my big photo and video files on an external drive. If what remains of my logic is wrong, please advise. :)
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,193
524
I'm planning to order a MacBook Air sometime this month, and I've decided that I'll blow a couple hundred on upgrading to 16GB of RAM. I don't know what software I'll want to use in the future, so I think 16 GB will cover me. I just sold my 2013 MacBook Air that had 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD. The SSD never blinked. I'm pretty sure I'll stay with the 256 GB SSD on the new machine; I never filled more than 100 GB on the old MacBook Air, and I store my big photo and video files on an external drive. If what remains of my logic is wrong, please advise. :)
for me not wrong having external drive . Just have fun when your machine arrived . :) .Dont forget to buy usb c hub ya
 

bluecoast

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2017
2,256
2,673
This is a really tricky one. I’d say that a computer in 2025 probably should have 16GB at a minimum. However, the Mac is becoming more iOS like with every release and I’d not be surprised if most Mac apps start to resemble iPadOS apps in their processor and memory requirements.

I’d still say to get more memory of you can afford it, but unless you’re doing serious content creation, it’s probably going to be ok with 8GB.
 

pshufd

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2013
10,149
14,574
New Hampshire
I'm planning to order a MacBook Air sometime this month, and I've decided that I'll blow a couple hundred on upgrading to 16GB of RAM. I don't know what software I'll want to use in the future, so I think 16 GB will cover me. I just sold my 2013 MacBook Air that had 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD. The SSD never blinked. I'm pretty sure I'll stay with the 256 GB SSD on the new machine; I never filled more than 100 GB on the old MacBook Air, and I store my big photo and video files on an external drive. If what remains of my logic is wrong, please advise. :)

Sounds like a plan. If you can use an external drive, then you save a lot of money over Apple Storage. I normally buy laptops with 512 GB of SSD. My daughter got the Air 16/1 because she thought that she could use the additional storage. I might go smaller in the future as I'm storing a lot of files on the home NAS these days. It works really great in lockdown mode though it might not be that great when we open up again.
 

Maconplasma

Cancelled
Sep 15, 2020
2,489
2,215
I have have a hard time believing someone who is debating spending $200 to upgrade the RAM is going to spend $21/month for Photoshop for "light photo editing." Heck, you can even use Photos for the basic stuff.
People make interesting decisions. Just because you don’t see it as a normal occurrence doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen often. People will pay their money based on what they see makes sense to them. The same person who won’t cough up the cash to upgrade ram will gladly pay for software they are comfortable with. One good example is MS Office. I run a business and it’s done solely using Apple’s iWork suite. Communicates easily with Office. Other home users prefer to use MS Office even if it’s just for Word simply because they are comfortable with the brand name.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.