Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Wowfunhappy

macrumors 68000
Mar 12, 2019
1,751
2,091
Firefox dynasty on el capitan is unusable for me. It crashes on sites that use too much JavaScript (which nowadays is very common). Also, it’s very laggy. It’s definitely not production ready yet
In order for it to get better, people need to open issues on Github with detailed bug reports which include clear and precise steps to reproduce the problem. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rampancy

Wowfunhappy

macrumors 68000
Mar 12, 2019
1,751
2,091
If anyone is still interested in Firefox Dynasty, the version just uploaded to Github (133a01) is a million times more stable for me on Mavericks. I have been casually browsing for the past hour and haven't run into any issues except one minor UI glitch. I'm posting from it right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Openbox72

Wowfunhappy

macrumors 68000
Mar 12, 2019
1,751
2,091
It's still early, but honestly I think this build of Firefox Dynasty is more stable than Chromium Legacy. I haven't had any issues with tabs randomly crashing or going blank. Battery life is noticeably better too, which probably means it's using less system resources in general.
 
Last edited:

f54da

macrumors 6502a
Dec 22, 2021
504
186
>Battery life is noticeably better too
That's kind of amazing since firefox has notoriously been more power hungry. I suppose maybe with GPU rendering disabled on both, firefox at least has some edge here because the non-gpu fallback might be more common
 

Openbox72

macrumors member
Jan 17, 2015
42
42
Canada
If anyone is still interested in Firefox Dynasty, the version just uploaded to Github (133a01) is a million times more stable for me on Mavericks. I have been casually browsing for the past hour and haven't run into any issues except one minor UI glitch. I'm posting from it right now.
As I understand we won't see any new update Chromium Legacy anymore ?
 
  • Sad
Reactions: rafark

rafark

macrumors 68000
Sep 1, 2017
1,841
3,223
It's still early, but honestly I think this build of Firefox Dynasty is more stable than Chromium Legacy. I haven't had any issues with tabs randomly crashing or going blank. Battery life is noticeably better too, which probably means it's using less system resources in general.
Doesn’t even load websites for me (el capitan)
 

SnowLeoMac

macrumors newbie
Mar 15, 2024
5
3
I've tried Firefox Dynasty 133a01 on El Capitan and on my machine (Macbook late 2009) it runs quite well. First time I tried to log into my Firefox account it hanged, but after I restarted it worked fine. I'm quite surprised because the browser also runs quite fast and smooth, whereas Chrome Legacy felt heavier. Very interesting project!
 

ricom2ger

macrumors member
Dec 30, 2020
50
38
I've tried Firefox Dynasty 133a01 on El Capitan and on my machine (Macbook late 2009) it runs quite well. First time I tried to log into my Firefox account it hanged, but after I restarted it worked fine. I'm quite surprised because the browser also runs quite fast and smooth, whereas Chrome Legacy felt heavier. Very interesting project!
After many tries I got the browser to work, I had to start the bin file once and after that it started with the app file as well. It is definitely more usable than Chromium, too often tabs crash with blank page. MBP09 with EC.
 

Avadis

macrumors newbie
Oct 30, 2024
2
0
I tested some Firefox-Dynasty versions in different MacOS versions (actual not virtual) from 10.8 Mountain Lion to 10.14 Mojave, I'll share my results:

Firefox-Dynasty 128 versions works in MacOS from 10.8 to 10.14
Firefox-Dynasty 129.0.1 works in MacOS from 10.8 to 10.9 and 10.14
Firefox-Dynasty 130.0.1 works in MacOS from 10.8 to 10.9 and 10.14
Firefox-Dynasty 131.0.1 works in MacOS from 10.8 to 10.9 and 10.14
Firefox-Dynasty 132 works in MacOS from 10.8 to 10.9 and from 10.12 to 10.14

Firefox-Dynasty initially crashed because I used Firefox profile selector, I needed to turn it off "Set as default profile" with url about: profiles.

Just tested to be able to navigate various sites, didn't test DRM.
 
Last edited:
Aside from test-driving Dynasty (in Mojave), I haven’t done the following just yet. When the time comes, I’ll copy my profile and profiles.ini setting from FF ESR, over to Dynasty to see how well it handles being given a pre-existing setup.

Although FF 115ESR support was announced to be EOL’d after August, Mozilla just pushed out another minor update for it (from 115.16.1 to 115.17). This means I’ll probably remain on 115ESR for just a short while longer before making that switch for daily driving.
 

wicknix

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Jun 4, 2017
2,624
5,310
Wisconsin, USA
Sealion and BrassMonkey for Intel Macs have finally been updated.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Raging Dufus

Xde

macrumors regular
Jul 11, 2016
152
35
I have no idea, what FF-Dynasty is. A new legacy project?
Can someone please add some information?

I just did a test run with 132.02 on Mavericks and it looks very promising.
I dont need DRM, I only need a secure up to date browser with valid cipher suites.
So, cipher suites fine, Youtube works, websites that dont show up well in 78.15 are showing fine now.
Thanks !
----------------------
Edit:
Day later: Sadly its now offline. I hope only for further developement.

PS for me the Apple world is dying. Every year new system bs and the most important thing, a webbrowser is
for trash every 3 years. Really nice to have legacy projects, but it seems not easy to get them to work properly.
But many thanks for the hard work...
Btw W7 gets still security updates. My current Mac will be the last one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jonathan50

ricom2ger

macrumors member
Dec 30, 2020
50
38
I have no idea, what FF-Dynasty is. A new legacy project?
Can someone please add some information?

I just did a test run with 132.02 on Mavericks and it looks very promising.
I dont need DRM, I only need a secure up to date browser with valid cipher suites.
So, cipher suites fine, Youtube works, websites that dont show up well in 78.15 are showing fine now.
Thanks !
----------------------
Edit:
Day later: Sadly its now offline. I hope only for further developement.

PS for me the Apple world is dying. Every year new system bs and the most important thing, a webbrowser is
for trash every 3 years. Really nice to have legacy projects, but it seems not easy to get them to work properly.
But many thanks for the hard work...
Btw W7 gets still security updates. My current Mac will be the last one.
Firefox-dynasty is up again on github. Newest build is 133.0b8 from 16.11.2024.
 

Xde

macrumors regular
Jul 11, 2016
152
35
oh nice, thank you. I got 132.02 before the site was down. Its really worth to try. I saved bookmarks and uninstalled other versions completely before.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.