i think you would enjoy American Gods. it is not without flaws, but it is certainly well written and it has a mix of mistery/historical mythology/fantasy that i think you'd find appealing.
as far as Ursula LeGuin, you might be right, and maybe in 1968 it was "better" relative to what was available then. but it certainly is eons removed from Tolkien both in terms of world building, storytelling and writing.
She is very influential and i haven't read anything else by her so i will withdraw any broader judgment, as i imagine her best work is elsewhere. btw, you would NOT like the treatment of women in this book (especially considering a woman wrote it)
re: Neal Stephenson, my fav work of his is Cryptonomicon. really loved that one.
Finished The Martian, thumbs up!
Good read, glad it was not over the top, and hopefully the movie will closely follow the book. Most interesting was how technology was utilized in this survival drama to overcome life threatening obstacles. And I'm glad the author did his technical homework.
Have yet to see the movie, but while reading I had pictured Irrfan Khan in the role of Vincent Kapoor, who played the CEO of Jurrasic World, but no. No biggy.
Yes there doesn't seem to be many of us. But, the best thing about reading a crap book are the reading the bad reviews, which I enjoyed from Amazon and Goodreads.interesting.
you are the first person i come across who didn't like it.
I did, it's great isn't itI think MRU posted this earlier, but I'm absolutely loving "Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children"
I read 100 pages last night and didn't think twice. AwesomeI did, it's great isn't it
i think you would enjoy American Gods. it is not without flaws, but it is certainly well written and it has a mix of mistery/historical mythology/fantasy that i think you'd find appealing.
as far as Ursula LeGuin, you might be right, and maybe in 1968 it was "better" relative to what was available then. but it certainly is eons removed from Tolkien both in terms of world building, storytelling and writing.
She is very influential and i haven't read anything else by her so i will withdraw any broader judgment, as i imagine her best work is elsewhere. btw, you would NOT like the treatment of women in this book (especially considering a woman wrote it)
re: Neal Stephenson, my fav work of his is Cryptonomicon. really loved that one.
I think MRU posted this earlier, but I'm absolutely loving "Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children"
I'm currently reading The Devil's Chessboard which is about Allen Dulles, good read. It's been a while but I'm knocking about 100 pages a shot.....when I actually get time to read.
Definitely, I love books that go down to the nitty gritty detail of how power works, this is one of those books.Now, that sounds like my kind of book. Do you recommend it and think it worth reading?
Definitely, I love books that go down to the nitty gritty detail of how power works, this is one of those books.
In a gist, it's tells the story of a teenager who is inspired by his grandfather's stories to go visit the remains of a school his grandfather attended during WWII.That sounds fascinating - what on earth is it about?
If you're into that kind of stuff I can't recommend "Typecasting" and "PR!" by Stewart Ewen enough. He is the definitive historian of propaganda ("PR" it was renamed after WWII). PR! is great to read first (it starts slow, but with Ewens interview of Edward Bernay's (the father of American propaganda), one of the last he gave in his life), then if you move onto Typecasting you'll have a MUCH better understanding of how many of the stereotypes and commonly held myths of society came about.Ah, and so do I. Very much so, in fact, not least because it can be so dramatically different from anything one studied or taught as an academic.
Thanks a lot for the recommendation. At their best, some of the US histories are very well written and highly readable.
I plan on watching the movie later tonight.
The book is better, not implying the movie should not be watched.
If you're into that kind of stuff I can't recommend "Typecasting" and "PR!" by Stewart Ewen enough. He is the definitive historian of propaganda ("PR" it was renamed after WWII). PR! is great to read first (it starts slow, but with Ewens interview of Edward Bern's (the father of American propaganda), one of the last he gave in his life), then if you move onto Typecasting you'll have a MUCH better understanding of how many of the stereotypes and commonly held myths of society came about.
Fascinating stuff.
Yeah we're likely to agree on some others. I'm not heavily into classics and i like crime fiction, that's why I read Killing Floor, and regretted reading it. That book told me that anyone can write a best seller. The fact that it has inspired many amateur writers to get into the fast track of self publishing is a bit sad but should be of no surprise in a world of lack of value, low substance. it makes it quite difficult to find a decent book based on reviews as well. I read somewhere that about 30% of online reviews were paid for, making them irrelevant. Reviewing systems are just not a great system anyway. How can there only be three stars between your most favourite book and the worst one you ever picked up?
I went off on a tangent there but it's because my faith in picking up a great book based on reviews or sales is really challenged these days and it's more annoying than getting fingers caught in a car door.
You should have done an IQ test before and after a Jack Reacher book to estimate the long term effects of the entire series.Jack Reacher books... I'm into my third one and I can't see me reading a 4th...