I'm assuming from the title alone that the author is atheist and hopes to convert his readers to atheism.
Yes, he is an atheist.
And he is someone who could be regarded as an ardent atheist.
I'm assuming from the title alone that the author is atheist and hopes to convert his readers to atheism.
Yes, he is an atheist.
And he is someone who could be regarded as an ardent atheist.
I would describe him as a militant atheist. I had to read that book for a class while I was in seminary and found it difficult to read, and not for the reasons you might think. His arrogance and condescending attitude towards people of faith made the book very difficult for me.
To those who view this book so favorably, I'd recommend How Christianity Changed the World.
Reading The Moor's Account by Laila Lalami and Death in Venice by Thomas Mann
Richard Dawkins is a polemicist, and welcomes robust and sometimes antagonistic debate, as I suspect he is of the opinion that those who support organised religion have been allowed an intellectual pass for far too long, and not subjected to a sufficiently rigorous intellectual examination of their beliefs.
Ah, Luchino Visconti made a powerful movie based on Thomas Mann's book Death in Venice which starred Dirk Bogarde.
The book itself is one of those books with a sort of elegiac 'mitteleuropa' flavours to it, and I seem to recall reading that von Aschenbach was loosely based on Gustav Mahler in terms of his physical appearance.
While I liked it a lot, of books written by Thomas Mann, I far preferred Buddenbrooks - which I thought brilliant - and the Magic Mountain - which - to my mind - is a very powerful and thought-provoking book.
Well this is my first time reading Mann. I am looking forward to reading more; "The Magic Mountain" is next on my list
In light of recent events, I want to reread a novel I read 2-3 years ago but can't recall the name. It was literary fiction and it took place in a South American country on the eve of a coup.
[doublepost=1469269158][/doublepost]Zing! Bel Canto.
Looks interesting. Please let us know how you like it.
I just started In Enemy Hands the other day. I'm way behind in catching up to you in the series.I finished it a couple of days ago. I liked it, but I'm not sure if I'll read the rest. It wasn't as good as the Honor Harrington series.
I just started In Enemy Hands the other day. I'm way behind in catching up to you in the series.
I just finished reading "A Concise History of Modern Painting" by Herbert Read after taking a break from it since I got busy. pretty awesome and this is coming from someone who didn't know anything/wasn't interested in art ~4 years ago.
Started "A History of Western Philosophy"by Bertrand Russell a few days ago. pretty epic too. his chapter on how Pythagoras influenced math and philosophy was pretty dope.
I never realized how much of a "radical" he was until i read a little about him. he seems like a chill dude. but yeah really enjoying the writing style/prose of this book so farAh, excellent: You managed to lay hands on Bertrand Russell's 'A History of Western Philosophy'? Terrific - I've always thought it a very readable, engaging and enjoyable book.
Years later, (Russell wrote A History of Western Philosophy in the 1940s), in the 60s, he was arrested as part of an anti Vietnam war demonstration. At his court hearing, his lawyer pleaded advanced age (Russell was 88 at the time) and ill health.
Unspoken (but implied) was the matter of class and privilege - although his whole life had been spent as a (genuine) political radical, - during the First World War, along with his first wife, a Quaker, he had embraced feminism, socially & economically radical policies and pacifism - Bertrand Russell was a hereditary member of the House of Lords, and a grandson of the Liberal Prime Minister Lord John Russell.
Apparently, the judge flicked a glance up at him, and asked, mildly, "And what is your actual age, Lord Russell?" to which Bertrand Russell replied, politely, "88, my Lord," whereupon the judge observed, "If you are 88 years of age, my Lord, you are old enough to know better," and sentenced him to a week behind bars - which he served. (The story comes from Russell's autobiography).
I never realized how much of a "radical" he was until i read a little about him. he seems like a chill dude. but yeah really enjoying the writing style/prose of this book so far
tonight, do that, i shallCheck out the extraordinary story (and court case) about how he had been appointed as Professor of Philosophy - to the Chair of Philosophy - at the University of the City of New York in 1940 but was fired before he could even take up his position.
I avoided the initial reviews, so I could go in an appreciate this for what it is. Extremely short by comparison to the later books, with perhaps less character development than I would have liked, still a fun return to a beloved series.