Going by that screenshot it's 1280×1024.What is your monitor resolution with that G4?
Last edited:
Going by that screenshot it's 1280×1024.What is your monitor resolution with that G4?
You know lot about it, right ?... only, trying to reach login.asp doesn't work on all systems.@eyoungren
External access - VPN only, but you'll need public ("white") IPv4 address & for more convinient usage - some DDNS service. Port forwarding is Evil in its purest form .
@galgot
Not as much as I want, a pair tricks with OpenVPN in OpenWRT-based router . Can you pls explain what is "login.asp" ?
Of course it is, how ashamed I am now. I got it all wrong and measured the preview window too, thus expecting something really exotic. phuuh, just let me move on now and forget about that..Going by that screenshot it's 1280×1024.
Yes, it's VNC. I do have a video card installed, but no monitor connected. And the binocs are for remote management.Just spying your screengrab and wondering..
What is your monitor resolution with that G4? Or are you doing vnc / screensharing or some other means to it? There seems to be binoculars in the menu bar, was that remote management icon.
I use all three from the inside. But only the server from outside.Thanks again. So if I got it, you use your NAS and your G4 inside your home network, and the G3 server from outside. Is it right?
You ain’t seen nothing yetOn Topic:
Just grabbed an Eizo FlexScan 2000S for free (20.1" 1600x1200, yo 2007), and verified it as a working one with my QS G4 933. Some serious real estate for OS 9 apps, isn't it.
Okey, a little bit more then. Not even half of the vertical resolution, I know..
Good to know that the S2000 can grapple with higher-than-native modes.I did try 1920 x 1080 too, but it gave me only 30Hz, against the promised 60Hz in the screen grab. And it was terrible, of no use at all. That was analog signal after all.
You did that on purpose!!Although since it was brought up I changed the resolution.
OS X looks surprisingly nice in monochrome-- is this done in hardware or software?Yes…
Although since it was brought up I changed the resolution.
It's stock OS X.OS X looks surprisingly nice in monochrome-- is this done in hardware or software?
This is something I didn't realise.......I don't see any reason to use RAM for color rendering when it could be used somewhere else by the system. I mean, most of the time, no one is going to see it, so that's a waste of RAM on systems that top out at 1 and 2GB max. So…that's why I have it on.
Does enabling this option reduce CPU or RAM usage? I’ve never bothered to check. (I have an actual monochrome LCD so I don’t need it.)[…] I don't see any reason to use RAM for color rendering […]
RAM usage yes. Not a lot. You aren't going to suddenly have 500mb free or something. Maybe 500k or less. It's just a small optimization I make on headless systems. I also did it at my former job where the G4s were headless. And it saved some ram on a 7200 I was using as an OS9 Applescript server. That one did have a color monitor attached but for what I did with the Mac it wasn't necessary.Does enabling this option reduce CPU or RAM usage? I’ve never bothered to check. (I have an actual monochrome LCD so I don’t need it.)
You'll probably have to flash a card using a Windows/Linux PC as the stock Apple cards market rolls between nonexistent and stupidly high prices (in my opinion).Anyone know a good 256 card this guy can run for a reasonable price?