<snip Snow Leopard stuff>
<nod> This is why bootable backups (courtesy of CCC) are king and why TM is worthless. IIRC, Snow Leopard wentto 10.6.8, so if you've a backup of that, you're covered.
Or, if you’re extra, like me…
<snip Snow Leopard stuff>
<nod> This is why bootable backups (courtesy of CCC) are king and why TM is worthless. IIRC, Snow Leopard wentto 10.6.8, so if you've a backup of that, you're covered.
Power to your, brother, but I have a 15% love 85% hate relationship with those things. To start with, Apple made it an absolute PITA to service the motherboard (this was pretty much the beginning of its deliberate FUs to independent techs who had to work on their stuff) compared to the G3/G4 ring-pull aqua/gray towers that preceded them, they weighed as much as a battleship, proprietary video standards out the wazoo meant expensive cables for everyone, and I can't even remember if the ram was nonstandard too. It was never fun dealing with a pallet of those things when a cosmetic scuff would reduce the resale value by 50% instantly (this was back before Apple had the chutzpah to apply the same unscrupulous strategy to iMac, macbook, and iphone screens).That also said, I’d much rather find a Westmere 2012 Mac Pro in excellent shape for similar pricing, to steadily kit it out.
Power to your, brother,
but I have a 15% love 85% hate relationship with those things. To start with, Apple made it an absolute PITA to service the motherboard (this was pretty much the beginning of its deliberate FUs to independent techs who had to work on their stuff) compared to the G3/G4 ring-pull aqua/gray towers that preceded them, they weighed as much as a battleship, proprietary video standards out the wazoo meant expensive cables for everyone, and I can't even remember if the ram was nonstandard too. It was never fun dealing with a pallet of those things when a cosmetic scuff would reduce the resale value by 50% instantly (this was back before Apple had the chutzpah to apply the same unscrupulous strategy that to iMac screens).
10.6.x isn’t available via IR, only via physical media.Internet Recovery offered me Lion - which I did not want. Maybe Apple doesn't have the 10.6.4 version available on their servers?
Can you elaborate?[…] proprietary video standards out the wazoo meant expensive cables for everyone, […]
What the dilemma was the ssd drive is 2011 which can only accept lion from a re-install.Had it done so before?
1. Restart while holding down .....
That’s fishy. Putting a newer internal SSD in a 2010 MBA shouldn’t compromise its ability to run SL.What the dilemma was the ssd drive is 2011 which can only accept lion from a re-install.
If it’s a working unit (as the most failure-prone have sort of removed themselves from circulation by now, just like the failure-prone iterations of the Power Mac G5 years earlier), then yes, $200 for what can be used as a file server or even a work station running OCLP-patched builds of macOS?
I mean, I’m replying to this as one who’s despised the Trash Can for a mess of reasons — not least of which the absurd form factor and limitations thereto — but that said, were I to stumble upon a well-functioning one locally for that price (which would be about $260 here), and I had the scratch to take on another vintage Mac right now, then yes, I’d regard it as a bargain and might consider it.
I’m also saying this as a former owner of a highly failure-prone Yikes! G4 Power Mac, bought brand new. It was worse than most Macs in the post-1997 era; the only reason it doesn’t get more notice is it was sold for a fairly short window of time, unlike the six years of MacPro6,1.
That also said, I’d much rather find a Westmere 2012 Mac Pro in excellent shape for similar pricing, to steadily kit it out.
Every so often, I have to roll this out…
10.6.x isn’t available via IR, only via physical media.
Chromium-legacy will also run the most up-to-date versions of various browser-extensions: uBlock Origin, Adblocker Ultimate, FB Purity, Sponsorblock, etc.Thanks, i have that installed, the realized my macbook pro's
sealion and Firefox legacy is all i need for the Internets,
but incase they wont load a page, that Chromium will be handy!
I would've thought that the 15" 2011 MBP with its inevitable GPU failure holds the title as the most failure prone Mac in recent history.
Have you seen Greg Hrutkay's appraisal of the Trash Can MP? It's worth watching.
You do indeed. Women exist within the Tech world...
Ok, that explains why it's unobtainable. Thanks for the clarification.
The really bad ones were the Late-2011 3.4ghz i7 27" iMacs and 15" and 17" MBPs with hopped-up video-cards, all of which were affected by "soldergate". (Installing MacsFanControl is nigh mandatory on dvd-era systems.)I would've thought that the 15" 2011 MBP with its inevitable GPU failure holds the title as the most failure prone Mac in recent history.
The really bad ones were the Late-2011 3.4ghz i7 27" iMacs and 15" and 17" MBPs with hopped-up video-cards, all of which were affected by "soldergate". (Installing MacsFanControl is nigh mandatory on dvd-era systems.)
For awhile (eight or ten years ago), it was worth doing, but now dvd-model iMacs are under-$50 recycler finds. (I remember replacing a VC in a Late-'11 27" for a customer; it clipped onto the backside of the MB, necessitating complete disassembly of the entire layer-cake to get at it. Short of Louis Rossman-style microscope-reballing, it was the most exasperating foray aside from replacing a MacBook keyboard with its five billion grain-of-sand sized screws.The EIM forum have addressed the MBP8,2 and 8,3 “Radeongate” issue extensively.TwoThree of the pinned topics here address how to work around that limitation (versus, say, disposing of the entire laptop by recycling). As for the 2009–2011 iMacs, there are also a couple of long threads, one pinned here, on how to swap out the GPU.
For awhile (eight or ten years ago), it was worth doing, but now dvd-model iMacs are under-$50 recycler finds. (I remember replacing a VC in a Late-'11 27" for a customer; it clipped onto the backside of the MB, necessitating complete disassembly of the entire layer-cake to get at it. Short of Louis Rossman-style microscope-reballing, it was the most exasperating foray aside from replacing a MacBook keyboard with its five billion grain-of-sand sized screws.
Most iMac soldergate victims became parts-donors, mainly for outer-glass.
that is normal, i just forgot that the 128GB ssd 2011 runs Snow leopardThat’s fishy. Putting a newer internal SSD in a 2010 MBA shouldn’t compromise its ability to run SL.
My MBP 2012 launches faster than the MBA2020 M1 from start up by several secondsView attachment 2398727
The latest MacBook Pro mid 2012 that can be changed and expanded all with a screwdriver. From here on I stopped being interested in MacBooks. I will never buy a Mac with soldered memories, soldered disks, and soldered batteries. Fast, hard, with quality, let's die together! ( I first)
I may be retracting what I wrote earlier about that price. Maybe lightning will strike the same place twice and someone else will just hand me their unloved, unwanted, unused 6,1.![]()
A girl can dream.![]()
Try running Snow Leopard on an SSD, even an old SATA one, it’s insanely fast.My MBP 2012 launches faster than the MBA2020 M1 from start up by several seconds
there is no logo and that white status bar, just the screen instantly on the MBP12!
Catalina wasn't great, but Big Sur was probably the smoothest version of macOS I ever ran on my unsupported 2012 i7 Mac mini. I rely almost entirely on open source software anyway, so had I no trouble with losing 32-bit support after Mojave. You need to chill, just let us all enjoy our machines.Hold on while I grab some Apple "longevity"-pumpers and strap them to chairs with their eyelids taped open.
Of course your intel machine is going to run like crap with Catalina+ (to say nothing of you-are-an-unpaid-betatester Sonoma) -- Apple designed its post-Mojae OSes to run like dogshat on intel for perfectly obvious reasons (and to add insult, killed off 32bit to drive everyone onto the bloated-sows subscription-model accelerating automatic-"update" artificial-obsolescence merrygoround). Fortunately, 98% of intel Macs don't have to run Apple's recent OSes.
Trust me: Apple will be killing your Mx joybox before you know it, and a few years later, every pawnshop will be full of the things. (Or maybe not, depending upon how efficiently Apple's brick-old-product schemes are proceding.)
That poor MacBook is longing for microchip heaven, where it'll finally get to play Peggle Nights again (which ran on eleven successive versions of the OS from Tiger to Mojave, and still is arguably the best puzzle game ever made).
Not quite. They made a Thunderbolt 1 dock with FW800 but no HDMI. And a (smaller) Thunderbolt 2 dock with HDMI 1.4 but no FW800. I have owned both.Belkin makes (or made) two models of this dock. One has the FW800 port, the other has an HDMI port.
About 90% of Mac open-source software is 32bit, of which there used to be a thriving community. Now everything is tightly controlled around the AppStore.Catalina wasn't great, but Big Sur was probably the smoothest version of macOS I ever ran on my unsupported 2012 i7 Mac mini. I rely almost entirely on open source software anyway, so had I no trouble with losing 32-bit support after Mojave.
That's not up to me, but Apple in 3-5 years.You need to chill, just let us all enjoy our machines.