Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's interesting that you found Capture One Pro to be foreign from what you were used to in Aperture. I actually found it to be quite similar, but that might be because I setup it to mimic my Aperture interface. See the attached screenshot. Try creating a Favorites tools panel in the editing tools column and add into it all of your most used Aperture type of adjustments.

I did this and spent the first six months like I owned an updated version of Aperture and didn't get any deeper into the color editing capabilities of Capture One Pro. Eventually I started to wander off of my "Aperture Favorites" tools cluster and little by little, I really came to love what I had in Capture One Pro.

The two things I loved the most about Aperture was the ease of catalog management and being able to make two or three simple slider adjustments to most photos to get it as I wanted it. I find Capture One Pro to be slightly less easy to use in both of these regards, but what you get in return is very sophisticated color and exposure editing that will allow you to make edits direct in Capture One Pro without having to send it to Photoshop or another program. So the basic edits take a little bit more time, but most of the advanced edits that used to take forever or not at all only take a modest amount of time.

One thing you'll want to be aware about with Capture One Pro though is that it's basically on a subscription basis. They come out with a new version about once a year and it's always a paid upgrade and you're only allowed to skip one version before you're not eligible for upgrade pricing. I expected that I'd buy one version and sit on it, but I've come to appreciate the new features so much that I've quickly upgraded when given the opportunity. I didn't expect to be using it so much. I don't mind paying a subscription for something I use all the time.



I'm interested in seeing that as well, but I'm a bit tempered in my expectations. Like you, I'm a programmer (if my memory serves me right) so I know very well that an easy to use and easy to administer cataloging tool that is also performant is very hard to do. Skylum has made more promises than it should have and has a lot of catching up to do. I'm not holding my breath in the near term, but would welcome having more options in the future should I tire of Capture One Pro's annual upgrades.
With the release of Capture One 12 you can upgrade from any previous version, so you can skip as many as you like.
 
With the release of Capture One 12 you can upgrade from any previous version, so you can skip as many as you like.

Really?! SWEEEET! I take it you're a C1P user too? I think that's smart on their part. I didn't expect to upgrade every year, but I've become so entwined with C1P that I really want those new features that they're introducing. My only hesitation to suggest it over Adobe Lightroom was that it's actually more expensive than Lightroom if you upgrade every year.
 
we us Image Capture on our iMacs to bring in the images

How does this work?

The IPP an option I would love(keeping my old 'Trashcan') on my desk could be a real victory for 'if it ain't broke don't fix it'.

Affinity Photo seems with 1.7 to have solved my Fuji Raf problem and editing is PDG with it; so no real need to upgrade.

Having tried virtually all the newest and besets software of late I have found little or no reason to change from what I have already paid for ;-)

The smaller IPP would add just that touch of encouragement for my photography in 2019 without a massive outlay and the X-T2; well I am still learning that so no need there!

Basically I would only want to edit on the desktop for printing while posting stuff and funnies can be a joy on the IPP - best of both worlds so long as transferring is not a catch?

Regards
 
This is how many of us feel about the Adobe subscription.

On the flip side, that's precisely my beef with the Adobe subscription. I'm a full stack Web developer. I spend about 5-10% of my time in Adobe products, but I pay more for it than I do for the dev tools I spend 80% of my time in. My commitment to their platform is an inch deep, but a mile wide so it'd be very hard for me to disconnect from them.

Well, as long as Adobe is willing to keep giving me a discounted rate, I'll keep with it. It's the cost of doing business I guess.
 
Really?! SWEEEET! I take it you're a C1P user too? I think that's smart on their part. I didn't expect to upgrade every year, but I've become so entwined with C1P that I really want those new features that they're introducing. My only hesitation to suggest it over Adobe Lightroom was that it's actually more expensive than Lightroom if you upgrade every year.
Not a regular user but I work at a photographic company so I speak to them from time to time.
 
On the flip side, that's precisely my beef with the Adobe subscription. I'm a full stack Web developer. I spend about 5-10% of my time in Adobe products, but I pay more for it than I do for the dev tools I spend 80% of my time in. My commitment to their platform is an inch deep, but a mile wide so it'd be very hard for me to disconnect from them.

Well, as long as Adobe is willing to keep giving me a discounted rate, I'll keep with it. It's the cost of doing business I guess.

Well, I don't *like* paying the subscription. But they do update regularly and give new features, and for the relative long term we know Adobe isn't going anywhere. So many products are subscription based now. It stinks as a hobbyist to have to pay that way, but if I can't afford $10/month as a hobbyist photographer, then I need to find a different hobby. Not wanting to jump into Adobe because of the learning curve I get, but to avoid it solely for the price, when nearly anything comparable is of comparable price.....that I don't get. But anyway, this thread is about hardware, not software, so I'll stop now. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: smirking
If I can't afford $10/month as a hobbyist photographer, then I need to find a different hobby.

I know what you mean. There are so many people on here whose aversion to the subscription model isn't so much the net cost to them, but just that it's a subscription.

But anyway, this thread is about hardware, not software, so I'll stop now. ;)

Whupps, my bad. I didn't even realize that. Ok, FWIW, I'm running Capture One Pro on a fully loaded 15" 2016 MBP with an LG 5K monitor. It works pretty well either in clamshell mode with the external monitor or on the laptop only, but I can't use my monitor and laptop screens to expand my workspace without some serious stutters.

I picked up the BlackMagic eGPU in hopes that it would give me enough of a boost to edit more quickly and also be able to drive my internal and external screens at the same time, but the eGPU actually SLOWED down my workflow. I got a modest boost in export speed, but that's not a meaningful gain to me so the eGPU was returned.

Browsing is relatively brisk. There is usually a slight stutter if I browse quickly, but nothing I can't handle. The edits happen pretty briskly most of the time as well, but occasionally I get some extended stutters there too.

Before I got my 5K monitor, I was using Capture One Pro 10 on a unibody 2012 MBP (briefly) and then on my 2016 MBP (with a 30" Apple Cinema Display). On a standard resolution monitor, Capture One Pro was very fast even on just my 2012 Unibody MBP. It wasn't until I swapped in the 5K monitor that it started to lag. Initially the lag was so bad I could barely use it, but subsequent versions of Capture One Pro started to work more nicely on 5K monitors.
 
How does this work?

Regards

Hook up your IOS device to your Mac. Start Image Capture on the Mac and show it which folder should be the destination. The tell it to import the image files from the IOS device. If later importing into Lr, C1P or other DAM, you can import to those apps from the initial destination folder. Your DAM will then create new destination folders, do renaming......etc.

 
That's interesting that you found Capture One Pro to be foreign from what you were used to in Aperture. I actually found it to be quite similar, but that might be because I setup it to mimic my Aperture interface. See the attached screenshot. Try creating a Favorites tools panel in the editing tools column and add into it all of your most used Aperture type of adjustments.

I did this and spent the first six months like I owned an updated version of Aperture and didn't get any deeper into the color editing capabilities of Capture One Pro. Eventually I started to wander off of my "Aperture Favorites" tools cluster and little by little, I really came to love what I had in Capture One Pro.

The two things I loved the most about Aperture was the ease of catalog management and being able to make two or three simple slider adjustments to most photos to get it as I wanted it. I find Capture One Pro to be slightly less easy to use in both of these regards, but what you get in return is very sophisticated color and exposure editing that will allow you to make edits direct in Capture One Pro without having to send it to Photoshop or another program. So the basic edits take a little bit more time, but most of the advanced edits that used to take forever or not at all only take a modest amount of time.

One thing you'll want to be aware about with Capture One Pro though is that it's basically on a subscription basis. They come out with a new version about once a year and it's always a paid upgrade and you're only allowed to skip one version before you're not eligible for upgrade pricing. I expected that I'd buy one version and sit on it, but I've come to appreciate the new features so much that I've quickly upgraded when given the opportunity. I didn't expect to be using it so much. I don't mind paying a subscription for something I use all the time.



I'm interested in seeing that as well, but I'm a bit tempered in my expectations. Like you, I'm a programmer (if my memory serves me right) so I know very well that an easy to use and easy to administer cataloging tool that is also performant is very hard to do. Skylum has made more promises than it should have and has a lot of catching up to do. I'm not holding my breath in the near term, but would welcome having more options in the future should I tire of Capture One Pro's annual upgrades.

Thank you for this info! It never occurred to me to try and set up Capture One Pro as a sort of a replication of my Aperture interface. I just leaped into it "cold," and at the time a bit overwhelmed by a lot of new images to process. I also was especially interested in the DAM aspects of C1 Pro, but never really got into that too much as I was busy trying to figure out how to edit my images.

Actually, I am a (retired) librarian, not a programmer, and yes, materials cataloging and hierarchical structures are something with which I have been long familiar. For the time being I am going to leave C1 Pro11 for Sony in my older MBP and experiment some more with it before deciding whether or not to move on into C1 Pro 12. In the meantime I am curious to see just how well Skylum will do with its new DAM and how effective it will be. I am hoping that it will be something which is user-friendly, efficient and effective and really gets the job done, but I don't anticipate that everything will be ideal and perfect the first time out of the gate. I'm sure that there will be updates frequently after first launch as unanticipated different issues emerge once the program is in many users' hands.
 
Last edited:
I'm in a bit of a dilemma because I'm still using LR6 and it doesn't handle most of the new camera model's RAW files so I need to convert them to DNG format.
The trouble started when I upgraded my old 2011 (or was it 2012) 13"MBP to one of the later Mac OS without checking LR6 compatibility so now it won't run unless I reformat my computer to it's original OS that the computer shipped with and go through the different OS updates to the last version that runs LR6.
So I've been using my wife's later 15" MBP to run LR6 instead which works just fine. But the latest version of DNG converter doesn't run on that OS, however if I upgrade OS then LR6 won't run.
So I've been using my 13" MBP running one of the latest OS's to convert my RAWs to DNG, then copying those DNG files to my wife's 15" MBP to edit on LR6. PITA right?
So I can get around this by subscribing to LR CC of course but LR6 works just fine. #firstworldproblems
 
I'm in a bit of a dilemma because I'm still using LR6 and it doesn't handle most of the new camera model's RAW files so I need to convert them to DNG format.
The trouble started when I upgraded my old 2011 (or was it 2012) 13"MBP to one of the later Mac OS without checking LR6 compatibility so now it won't run unless I reformat my computer to it's original OS that the computer shipped with and go through the different OS updates to the last version that runs LR6.
So I've been using my wife's later 15" MBP to run LR6 instead which works just fine. But the latest version of DNG converter doesn't run on that OS, however if I upgrade OS then LR6 won't run.
So I've been using my 13" MBP running one of the latest OS's to convert my RAWs to DNG, then copying those DNG files to my wife's 15" MBP to edit on LR6. PITA right?
So I can get around this by subscribing to LR CC of course but LR6 works just fine. #firstworldproblems

Well you don't say what OS version you are using, so it's kind of hard to assess. But assuming you are on Mojave, based on your comments, everything I've read said that LR6 is compatible with Mojave.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4329275
 
Once the Vega graphics options had been released I started looking for comments about both the Vega 16 and the Vega 20, initially thinking I would go with the 16, but it seemed as though most the reviews and comments were about the Vega 20 and finally I decided to do the easy thing and just go with that. Yes, when I first began contemplating a 2018 15" MBP I was thinking in terms of i7, 32 GB RAM and 1 TB SSD, but the i9 sounded just so tempting (once the problems in the beginning were resolved). I also liked the idea that I could just go right to the Apple store and get one out of their inventory, no need to order online and wait for a delivery either to my home or to the store. I'd no sooner made up my mind about that then Apple added the two Vega options and so once again I was waiting and trying to make the best decision not just for now but also for the future, three or more years ahead..... I'll admit that what finally made my choice easier was when Apple began offering the configuration of i9/32 GB RAM/1 TB SSD/Vega 20 Graphics in their retail stores. I spent more money than I had initially started out thinking I would but I am happy, very happy, with my choices!
I keep clicking the options on the Apple Store and they keep showing these in stock. So damn tempting just to go that route and avoid the 10 day wait.
 
That's what really did it for me -- the immediate gratification of being able to pick one up right at the closest Apple store..... This way, too, if there had been any problems, I could've immediately gone to the store and said, "I need some help here...." Thankfully, so far at least, everything is working fine, looking good! It was nice not having to wait for one to be shipped (and I would have had to go over to the store to pick it up anyway, as I prefer that method to having it delivered here at home since I am in a garden-style condo apartment complex, no handy concierge desk or office for deliveries to be made. So, yes, I went somewhat over budget, more than my original plan had been, but in the end it's worth it, especially over the long term.
 
That's what really did it for me -- the immediate gratification of being able to pick one up right at the closest Apple store..... This way, too, if there had been any problems, I could've immediately gone to the store and said, "I need some help here...." Thankfully, so far at least, everything is working fine, looking good! It was nice not having to wait for one to be shipped (and I would have had to go over to the store to pick it up anyway, as I prefer that method to having it delivered here at home since I am in a garden-style condo apartment complex, no handy concierge desk or office for deliveries to be made. So, yes, I went somewhat over budget, more than my original plan had been, but in the end it's worth it, especially over the long term.
I am thinking of this also, they seem to be cranking these out more than just a BTO option. So if there are issues it would be easier to get it replaced and not have to wait a month.
 
I am thinking of this also, they seem to be cranking these out more than just a BTO option. So if there are issues it would be easier to get it replaced and not have to wait a month.

That's a good point! I think that for many, this is proving to be a popular configuration and that makes sense that they'd offer it in the stores, which has the result of making it even more popular, which is to everyone's benefit! Yes, if there are issues which crop up somewhere along the line, particularly in the first few days of ownership, it would be much easier to get a replacement.
 
That's a good point! I think that for many, this is proving to be a popular configuration and that makes sense that they'd offer it in the stores, which has the result of making it even more popular, which is to everyone's benefit! Yes, if there are issues which crop up somewhere along the line, particularly in the first few days of ownership, it would be much easier to get a replacement.
How do you like the new keyboard?
 
Actually, I have used the new keyboard very little, since I have the machine on a stand and am using a space grey external keyboard and mouse with it. One of these days now that she's all set up I'll have to take her off the stand and try out the on-board keyboard!
 
Actually, I have used the new keyboard very little, since I have the machine on a stand and am using a space grey external keyboard and mouse with it. One of these days now that she's all set up I'll have to take her off the stand and try out the on-board keyboard!
Now I have to ask, what's her name. :p
 
This one is called 2018 MBP in order to differentiate her from her older sister, the 2015 MBP...... Back when I had a 13" 2015 MBP and a 15" 2015 MBP I also included the size in the name.

Another thing I like to do is to replace the ugly icon of a hard drive with a photo of the machine..... (In .png format to use transparency for any background in the photo). I also like to use photos as my folder icons, too, on the desktop.
 
Last edited:
This one is called 2018 MBP in order to differentiate her from her older sister, the 2015 MBP...... Back when I had a 13" 2015 MBP and a 15" 2015 MBP I also included the size in the name.

Another thing I like to do is to replace the ugly icon of a hard drive with a photo of the machine..... (In .png format to use transparency for any background in the photo). I also like to use photos as my folder icons, too, on the desktop.
That’s a good idea. I’ve never thought of that!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.