Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What ports should make a return to the 2021 Macbook Pro?

  • USB-A

    Votes: 207 36.4%
  • HDMI

    Votes: 235 41.4%
  • SD Slot

    Votes: 242 42.6%
  • Magsafe

    Votes: 337 59.3%
  • None, just keep it USB-C only

    Votes: 135 23.8%
  • Ethernet

    Votes: 97 17.1%

  • Total voters
    568

dave070

macrumors regular
Oct 17, 2019
140
146
Nevada
If you're not a Pro photographer then don't speak for the rest of us. I happen to be one and I have multiple DSLR's and Mirrorless from Nikon, Canon and Sony. Between the 3 brands I have CF, SD and XQD cards. An SD card slot would be 100% useless to use with all 3 of my cameras. No true pro photographer has just one camera and many newer professional cameras use C-Fast, XQD and some SD cards. Nice try but this SD card argument is so old and irrelevant.
Aren't they mostly consolidating around CFexpress type B?
 
Last edited:

twsmit

macrumors newbie
Aug 24, 2020
3
5
I don't see Apple adding back any legacy ports; it's just not going to happen. Macbooks are designed for portability, and infrequently used legacy ports shouldn't compromise the form factor. Doing so, they'd compromise portability, e.g., reducing battery life, increasing weight or thickness, etc.....

TB docks using one wire setups are the solution for pros and power users who need peripherals like mice, keyboards, monitors, external drives, and ethernet at a desk and in the field, throw a couple of adapters or a bus-powered hub into your bag with your charger, and you're good to go.

I also don't get the obsession with the old MagSafe. It was designed for the spinning disk and DVD era, which has long since passed us by. Back in the day, MagSafe was invaluable as a means of protecting an HDD from being damaged from a fall or preventing a DVD you were ripping from exploding upon impact with the ground. These are no longer factors. You don't need MagSafe with SSDs, hardly any moving parts, and 18+ hours of battery life. You're hardly ever going to be plugged in regardless.

The barrel plugs MagSafe replaced were fragile, but USB-C is way stronger and more compact. MagSafe solved the dual issues of laptops crashing to the ground and dying and barrel plugs getting damaged. Those are just not issues anymore.
 

JeepGuy

macrumors 6502
Sep 24, 2008
332
110
Barrie
I don't see Apple adding back any legacy ports; it's just not going to happen. Macbooks are designed for portability, and infrequently used legacy ports shouldn't compromise the form factor. Doing so, they'd compromise portability, e.g., reducing battery life, increasing weight or thickness, etc.....

TB docks using one wire setups are the solution for pros and power users who need peripherals like mice, keyboards, monitors, external drives, and ethernet at a desk and in the field, throw a couple of adapters or a bus-powered hub into your bag with your charger, and you're good to go.

I also don't get the obsession with the old MagSafe. It was designed for the spinning disk and DVD era, which has long since passed us by. Back in the day, MagSafe was invaluable as a means of protecting an HDD from being damaged from a fall or preventing a DVD you were ripping from exploding upon impact with the ground. These are no longer factors. You don't need MagSafe with SSDs, hardly any moving parts, and 18+ hours of battery life. You're hardly ever going to be plugged in regardless.

The barrel plugs MagSafe replaced were fragile, but USB-C is way stronger and more compact. MagSafe solved the dual issues of laptops crashing to the ground and dying and barrel plugs getting damaged. Those are just not issues anymore.
MagSafe protects your screen, it's very costly to replace the screen on a macbook, and believe me they break very easily.
 

dwaite

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2008
1,372
1,117
That's very good point!

Although this means a radical redesign of the metal chassis. Plastic or glass. I cringed a little when thought of an all-glass (like iPhone) Macbook.
Glass top with keyboard cutout. Trackpad and touchbar are now capacitive touch surfaces with haptic engines. Case exterior is unibody aluminum.

Wouldn't be _that_ bad, would it? Although I'd crack up if they had a system preference to let you adjust the size and position of your trackpad.
 

dwaite

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2008
1,372
1,117
USB-A can't go away, simply because it's impossible to find a USB-C Hub that simply multiply your USB-C ports, like USB-A can easily.

If you have a USB-C to Ethernet adapter, a USB-C External Drive and a USB-C Mouse, it's literally impossible to use those 3 at the same time on your 2 USB-C port MacBook Air/Pro.
AFAIK USB4 adds back the capability to make multi-port downstream hubs. They just aren't on the market yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

Populus

macrumors 603
Aug 24, 2012
5,953
8,420
Spain, Europe
All I really need are a few more USB-C ports, 4 for base laptops, 6 for high end models. And a headphone jack.

Aside from that I don’t really need much more ports, maybe a SD card reader for professionals
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacDividend

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,745
??
Glass top with keyboard cutout. Trackpad and touchbar are now capacitive touch surfaces with haptic engines. Case exterior is unibody aluminum.

Wouldn't be _that_ bad, would it? Although I'd crack up if they had a system preference to let you adjust the size and position of your trackpad.
The "I'm feeling uncomfortable because with an electron microscope I once saw a scratch on the back of my Apple Watch"-crowd would be intolerable with a glass top laptop from Apple simply existing. ?

An adjustable trackpad wouldn't be all bad, though; I actually think that the one on my MBP16 is too big, and the way I hold my hands sometimes definitely messes with how it works.
 

akbarali.ch

macrumors 6502a
May 4, 2011
834
745
Mumbai (India)
for my work . hdmi is a must and i hate dongle life.
Why hdmi port ? i dont get it. There's a cable for almost everything. I need more ports USBC/TB4 ports, so i dont need to use any dongle. you can pretty much change each and every cable to end in USBC and you just need to do once. No need to lug around any dongle.
 

akbarali.ch

macrumors 6502a
May 4, 2011
834
745
Mumbai (India)
Just put USBC/TB3 x 6 ports.

4 Ports should also be fine.

2 ports is stupid. Out of which one need to be used solely for charging, i mean, why we need to use such a hi-tech port just for charging.
 

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,745
??
Just put USBC/TB3 x 6 ports.

4 Ports should also be fine.
You mean like they already have?

it's not in all their hardware, but for the ones that do need it it already exists.

Personally I only use 1/4 on my MBP16; everything else is connected via the hub at the back of my display. (With one occasional exception: My SD-card reader.)
 

aeronatis

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2015
198
152
What a condescending and quite frankly, offensive argument.

So just because I don't use 3 expensive digital cameras with more advanced technical builds means I'm not as much of a pro as you? You don't know anything about me, my career, what I have achieved or how much I make, so first off I'm going to need you to reel your assumptions all the way back in.

Second, since you feel like making this a pissing contest about gear, I have 2 mirrorless digital cameras + 5 Film Cameras including 16mm & 35mm for video and 35mm & Medium Format ones for stills. I use all of them professionally and do exceedingly well at life.

And yes both my digital cameras have SD card slots. I use them regularly for 4K Video capture & RAW photography.

Creative professionals aren't accountants working with the same version of Excel globally. We all have a wide range of requirements and needs to cater to and, like it or not, SD Cards still happens to be the more universally implemented solution for camera storage.

While I agree with your response to the previous comment, I do have to point something out. As you correctly stated, every professional has different requirements, and that is exactly why there should be only USB-C ports that are Thunderbolt capable. Why would I have a single purpose port like SD card slot if I am a music producer, code writer, 3D modeller, etc?

By the way, I am a video creator and I actually use SD cards; however, me asking for an SD card slot is no different than a music producer asking for an XLR input.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Stephen.R

MowgliWolf

macrumors regular
Nov 17, 2020
228
166
Given the additional slots 4 vs 2) due to smaller size, and availability of updated usb type C for most music production and DJ gear I’m quite happy for it to remain as is.
However if they can pair MagSafe and the smart dock from the iPad, I’d be really keen on that!
Maybe toss in a removable internal ssd and option to go touchbarless I’m happy as a pig in poo :)
 

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,745
??
While I agree with your response to the previous comment, I do have to point something out. As you correctly stated, every professional has different requirements, and that is exactly why there should be only USB-C ports that are Thunderbolt capable. Why would I have a single purpose port like SD card slot if I am a music producer, code writer, 3D modeller, etc?

By the way, I am a video creator and I actually use SD cards; however, me asking for an SD card slot is no different than a music producer asking for an XLR input.
Another context/voice here:

I semi-regularly use SD-cards (professionally); but I didn't ask for an SD-card slot. (Did ask for HDMI and magsafe, though.)
 

537635

macrumors 65816
Mar 7, 2009
1,154
1,041
Slovenia, EU
Glass top with keyboard cutout. Trackpad and touchbar are now capacitive touch surfaces with haptic engines. Case exterior is unibody aluminum.

Wouldn't be _that_ bad, would it? Although I'd crack up if they had a system preference to let you adjust the size and position of your trackpad.
I was thinking the same thing. Unibody GorillaGlass topcase with keyboard and speaker holes, seamless trackpad. This sounds like something Apple would do.
 

aeronatis

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2015
198
152
Another context/voice here:

I semi-regularly use SD-cards (professionally); but I didn't ask for an SD-card slot. (Did ask for HDMI and magsafe, though.)

If it will be a full sized HDMI 2.1, I can understand as it will be useful for years to come; however, if it will be something like mini HDMI, better to just add another USB-C as you will need a different cable anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: svanstrom

nicfle

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2014
41
24
Imo every format that can be easily and cheaply used with an adaptor should be considered unnecessary.
Dated formats should make room for new formats in a 10-15 year cycle (if possible with an adaptor for transition period).

That said. I think USB-A is not a thing that new products should (!) have. There are small and cheap adaptors for USB-A stuff. I don't expect my cheap 20 years old printer to have drivers for my new Mac. Why should I expect to have a native port for it? Yes, I know USB-A is widely used, but that should not stop us from going forward.

I am sad that adaptor support for Firewire 400 and 800 is rare and expensive, but I am glad that better formats took this place.

So, in my mind there should not be a native USB-A, Ethernet, VGA or HDMI port. All of these are easylly used with a adaptor or dongle. Apple and other manufacturers lead the way and show the suppliers what is the future - not the way arround. I might be willing to see the audio jack port converted (not removed) for something better quality in the future.

Oh and for those that say good for you to say if you don't personally use those ports. Well, I use them, but for me adaptors is not a problem. I will use these for my other devises also (iPad, Nintendo Switch..). I prefer the option to ha many "universal" ports. Give me more USB-C ports and the options to choose what I use the ports for.

In my pick: ethernet adaptor (cost about 10€ ), HDMI adaptor (cost about 10€) and a USB-a adaptor (cost about 2€ €). These are regular prices of well ranked products. I guess you could find cheaper options. My point is don't get stuck in the past just because its the norm. It's not like there's no cheap, small, and convenient adaptors to choose from while you transit to newer accessories.
 

Attachments

  • adaptors.jpeg
    adaptors.jpeg
    471 KB · Views: 35

aknabi

macrumors 6502a
Jul 4, 2011
602
1,002
can't you use USB-C to HDMi cable? There is no need for HDMI to HDMI on MBP.

I think the ports will be 4 USB-C, MagSafe, 1 USB - A(maybe), 1 SD Card slot(maybe)
Well that's just carrying a cable vs a dongle (vs nothing)... mosts meeting rooms have a HDMI cable (male) sticking through the middle of the table that you plug into and present.

And that's the point... people want to just walk in with their Mac and not need any additional cables (not to mention I still have issues with C-HDMI cables being a big wonky, flickering, etc. - I carry an Apple adapter as well as 2 different 3rd party ones just in case... between them I generally get it sorted... right now the issue is sorted due to covid and lockdowns)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy

AndiG

macrumors 65816
Nov 14, 2008
1,173
2,195
Germany
The Macbook Pro should incorporate
  • USB-A just because everyone uses it
  • HDMI 2.0 - there are no beamers for thunderbolt
  • (Mini)SD Slot - mandatory for embedded developers and photographers
  • USB-C because it is the future and offers high speed

Ports should make the difference berween pro and non pro models.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.