Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow. Looks like Amazon has stopped carrying the Kingston HyperX. First they kept pushing back the available date and now they only seller is some place in New Jersey for a lot more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Do we know if we can upgrade it?
It can be upgraded very easily. Go to the apple and the memory tab where you'll find a link to instructions on upgrading memory.
(I didn't notice this comment was so old. You must have an answer by now.)
 
I'm looking to upgrade from 8GB to 24GB.
Is this one correct and good for the 27" 5k 2017 iMac?

Corsair Vengeance 16GB DDR4 (2x8GB), 2400MHz, CL16
CMSX16GX4M2A2400C16



 
Can I add just one , e.g a Crucial CT16G4SFD824A model, to the new 2017 model 27inch iMac? So it goes from 8 to 24 Gb? If that's possible, what slot occupation would be the best ? Currently the two 4Gb are at slot 1 and 3. Have the single 16 Gb module at slot 1 and move one 4Gb to slot 2 (and leaving the other at slot 3?)?
I don't want to fill up the last empty slot already but might do that some time in further future.

My question as well
[doublepost=1535526219][/doublepost]
Thought I made a good deal on 16GB Crucial Kit to upgrade my 8GB RAM 5K iMac. As it turns out, I ordered a single module, no kit.

How did it work out?
 
Im getting a New 2017 27 inch i7 sendt to me as a replacement for a broken earlier model imac. In my old one I had 16+16 ddr3 ram which worked fine ( 16 apple ram 16 3rd party ), so Im assuming since im getting 16 ram from apple its 2x8 and 2 slots are free.
Any1 know for sure ? Hope its not 4x4 .. ordering 16 ram now would otherwise be a waste.

I know this ram will work
Crucial DDR4 2400Mhz
PC4-19200 - Unbuffered 260pin

thx
Thomas
 
Hello, can anyone advise on how to fit 2 x different matched pairs:

2 x Crucial 8GB (matched)
2 x Hynix 8GB (matched)

Would it be alternating (Crucial/Hynix/Crucial/Hynix - or reverse) ?

Or Crucual / Crucial / Hynix / Hynix ?
 
Hello, can anyone advise on how to fit 2 x different matched pairs:

2 x Crucial 8GB (matched)
2 x Hynix 8GB (matched)

Would it be alternating (Crucial/Hynix/Crucial/Hynix - or reverse) ?

Or Crucual / Crucial / Hynix / Hynix ?
alternating: ABAB
the slots are arranged in banks of 0/1/0/1
 
  • Like
Reactions: dickybow

Yes, I highly recommend it for the 2017 iMac. I've been using 32Gb of that exact RAM in my own 2017 iMac for over two years now.

Get the 2400 MT/s part though. Your link is to the 2666MT/s. It will likely work with no problems in the 2017 iMac but throttled.

This is the one you want:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01DGOF3E4
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: daves516
After reading this thread thoroughly I plumped for these Crucial bad boys Crucial CT2K16G4S24AM 32 GB Kit... https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B072K5NPRM?ref=ppx_pop_mob_ap_share and installed them into the 2017 3.5ghz iMac I recently purchased (heavily discounted as it’s now an outgoing model). Works perfectly in the thing is now like a F1 car! Really pleased and thankful for this thread.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: SaSaSushi
32GB vs 16GB sticks?

Will 32GB 2666MHz memory stick perform roughly as good as 2x16GB 2400 MHz, if mixed with pre-installed 2x4GB 2400MHz sticks?

I'm choosing RAM to upgrade iMac 2017 27" i5 3.8GHz. Similarly to @logas69 in a related thread, I'm considering to buy one 32GB stick now, and add one or two more when I can afford it; ideally using it alongside pre-installed 8GB.

I've seen reports (1, 2) that 2666MHz can work with i7-powered iMac--but didn't find anyone tried it with 3.8GHz i5 which I have.

Similarly, the above reports quote that 32GB sticks are supported with i7, but it's unclear whether they will work with 3.8GHz i5.

The 2400-2666 mix is believed to work correctly (assuming BootROM 172.0.0.0 and Mojave 10.14.5), but I haven't seen any reports proving it nor comparing performance between "mixed" and "same-frequency" setups.

As for double vs single-channel, I've seen some non-Mac benchmarks (see Benchmarks section) which suggest the difference in neglible in real-life scenarios, but again I didn't find reports specifically for Mac.

For reference, these are different-capacity mix, double+single-stick benchmarks (1, 2) suggesting adding a single stick won't degrade performance.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.