I can reach out to a stranger on any platform.
In real life, you knock on the door (or should knock on a door) - especially if it is a private space, an office, a study, a bedroom, a bathroom - before entering a room where someone is.
To do otherwise, is incredibly bad manners, and extraordinarily presumptuous because it suggests that your right to their presence and time over-rides their preference and does not require permission.
Consent matters, even - indeed especially - in the online world. And, to my mind, you need permission, you need consent to enter a private or personal space, even if that is online.
Thus, in essence, I am arguing for the online equivalent.
Here, in this thread, we are all chatting together - or, conversing with one another - in what is the public part of the forum.
Of course, anyone can read what we post here; that is a given.
However, in the online space, DMs/PMs are an entirely separate matter, and are different.
These are all social media platforms.that is the ping I am making.
Yes, but that is no reason not to follow what used to be deemed norms of courtesy and manners.
I find it amazing that you folks who have tens of thousands of posts about your specific preferences think you are any less visible online here than elsewhere.
I accept that you are visible when you post online.
That, however, does not do away with the desire - and preference - to preserve the personal and private sphere, and to insist that consent - permission - the online equivalent of knocking on a door before entering a room ought still be sought.
Any half decent AI bot can come up with a good profile about us.
Agreed.
Anyone can read most of the posts on this forum.
On the public forum, yes, of course.
That is understood and is a given in this context.
However, that does not apply to DMs.
In real life, one has to learn to deal with strangers. They might be at your door, in your inbox or in social media, and none of these are rare occurrences.
Yes, you have to deal with them, but one can decide - such as by setting boundaries - how one chooses to deal with them when they encroach on the private and personal space.
At work, when deployed abroad, when shopping, or socialising, of course one meets strangers.
However, the key point is that you have already chosen to be in the public space or sphere, and that you will meet and encounter people follows from that.
My issue is with the presumption that - not least because social media seeks to challenge the existence of very concept of privacy, let alone a right to it seeking to replace it with the idea that everyone should be contactable at all times - that one has the right to contact anyone at any time, by any means, simply because one is able to do so, as the technology enables and facilitates this.
This fails to recognise that some people may prefer not to be contacted in such a manner, and that their consent and permission ought to be acquired - the equivalence of a polite knock on a door, or some other signal that shows consent has been given (such as giving someone a private email address, or your personal mobile/cell phone number).
Nevertheless, it is clear that we have yet to establish an agreed etiquette for how we navigate and relate to one another across the online world.