Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd suggest 1Blocker (on both macOS and iOS).

It uses Safari's native content-blocker API, blocks YouTube ads, allows hiding specific elements on a page, has support for custom rulesets, syncs across your devices via iCloud.
 
I'd suggest 1Blocker (on both macOS and iOS).

It uses Safari's native content-blocker API, blocks YouTube ads, allows hiding specific elements on a page, has support for custom rulesets, syncs across your devices via iCloud.
Interesting, cheers for the recommendation. I see that is also the one that the guys from uBlock Origin most highly recommend as an alternative.

Edit: Shucks... 1Blocker requires MacOS 10.15 or later and I'm stuck on Mojave with my 5,1 Mac Pro :(
 
Last edited:
I agree! I would gladly pay for uBlock Origin. I miss it now with the new version of Safari. I use Ghostery Lite now but ittlacking comparatively. How did you still get uBlock Origin to work? Safari just tells me it’s no longer supported.

The one I use on Chrome is Stands which lets mealso select specific items on a webpage I want to block (which is great).

I didn't. I wouldn't use Ghostery they seem shady to me. I would use DuckDuckGo plugin or PrivacyBadger which blocks trackers but not ads.

I use PiHole , you basically buy a raspberry pi and install this software on it, connect it to your router via ethernet and it blocks all ads on all your devices(ipad,tv, anything) that is connected to your Wifi/router. It will not block YouTube ads though for technical reasons. Do not install ANY blocklist when setting it up, only use this blocklist. The reason is because this blocklist has been specifically curated in a way that it blocks all the ads but will not hinder or block service/website you may want to use. Other lists do that.

I bought the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ model. Here is a great tip, if you choose to install it, connect the raspberry pi to your router and SSH into it. Do not set up the raspberry pi then connect it to your router, it gives you more trouble like that. If you find the blocklist helpful please donate to the list maintainer. Spread the word!
 
I didn't. I wouldn't use Ghostery they seem shady to me. I would use DuckDuckGo plugin or PrivacyBadger which blocks trackers but not ads.

I use PiHole , you basically buy a raspberry pi and install this software on it, connect it to your router via ethernet and it blocks all ads on all your devices(ipad,tv, anything) that is connected to your Wifi/router. It will not block YouTube ads though for technical reasons. Do not install ANY blocklist when setting it up, only use this blocklist. The reason is because this blocklist has been specifically curated in a way that it blocks all the ads but will not hinder or block service/website you may want to use. Other lists do that.

I bought the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ model. Here is a great tip, if you choose to install it, connect the raspberry pi to your router and SSH into it. Do not set up the raspberry pi then connect it to your router, it gives you more trouble like that. If you find the blocklist helpful please donate to the list maintainer. Spread the word!
Interesting. What about Ghostery makes them look shady in your opinion?
 
Hmmm. Just thinking out loud; what would be the downside to that for us users?
The downside of an analytics company... offering a tool to block... ads and tracking scripts...?

It's kind of like asking a crooked cop to teach ethics...

But a bigger point is to look at it in terms of a business - if they offer it for free, there must be a reason. No business anywhere offers anything for free, just because. There's a bottom line to it. Apple offers a free tier on iCloud to provide basic functionality to users who bought hardware. Google offers free services online, to build profiles of people, to show 'better' (for them/their customers) ads to the people. Etc. Even my own business is the same. I provide free (technically, Open source) software to my clients (and thus anyone else can use it theoretically too) because it gives them the knowledge that they're paying for my time to provide them with services, and they're not going to be locked in to paying more money if I disappear - the source code is there, anyone can come along and maintain or improve it for them.

So why does an analytics company and then a media company offer something like this for free? If they're not selling it to you, how do they make money from it?
 
Titel says it all - since adblock plus doesnt work in it's old form anymore with the new safari - what's the best new alternative?

I refuse to use ad-blocks since that's how a website earns money.

I hope people are contributing to MacRumors (almost no ads if they contribute) if they decide to use an ad block.
 
I refuse to use ad-blocks since that's how a website earns money.

I hope people are contributing to MacRumors (almost no ads if they contribute) if they decide to use an ad block.
If sites used non-tracking ad networks served from the local domain, most blockers wouldn't work out of the box anyway - you'd need to add heaps of custom rules for every site to hide specific elements.

If a site chooses to show ads using a known privacy abusing network like Google, don't expect any sympathy from me about lost revenue.
 
The downside of an analytics company... offering a tool to block... ads and tracking scripts...?

It's kind of like asking a crooked cop to teach ethics...

But a bigger point is to look at it in terms of a business - if they offer it for free, there must be a reason. No business anywhere offers anything for free, just because. There's a bottom line to it. Apple offers a free tier on iCloud to provide basic functionality to users who bought hardware. Google offers free services online, to build profiles of people, to show 'better' (for them/their customers) ads to the people. Etc. Even my own business is the same. I provide free (technically, Open source) software to my clients (and thus anyone else can use it theoretically too) because it gives them the knowledge that they're paying for my time to provide them with services, and they're not going to be locked in to paying more money if I disappear - the source code is there, anyone can come along and maintain or improve it for them.

So why does an analytics company and then a media company offer something like this for free? If they're not selling it to you, how do they make money from it?
I see. It is my understanding that that Ghostly Midnight privacy suite is in the works and that will be a paid service.
 
Well that may answer the question, certainly.
So prob no ‘shady’ business after all but just the familiar ‘offer free-then paid’.

I’m trying the Ghostly plugin for chrome atm (which is a more elaborate one versus the lite version for Safari) and I must say it’s performing well (coming from Stands Fair adblocker for Chrome).
 
Yes, that's correct. I installed it from the App Store when the Safari update broke uBlock Origin.

I didn't realize 1Blocker was NLA in the App Store for Mojave. Just looked... gone.

Sorry for the confusion.
No worries, that clears that up then.
 
Interesting. What about Ghostery makes them look shady in your opinion?

its a trust issue... online there is no longer trust because shareholders and top management have been proven many times over they are willing to do many unethical things behind the scenes to increase their profits.

So people now only use software from companies they trust (Apple) or open-source software like uBlock Origin. Btw, if you like to use Chrome check out Brave browser. Its open source and blocks trackers+ads by default.
 
So people now only use software from companies they trust (Apple) or open-source software like uBlock Origin.
I think it's more nuanced than that. The general consensus I feel for people working in tech is to acknowledge that if you aren't paying for it with money, you are the thing being sold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: upandown
So prob no ‘shady’ business after all but just the familiar ‘offer free-then paid’.

I’m trying the Ghostly plugin for chrome atm (which is a more elaborate one versus the lite version for Safari) and I must say it’s performing well (coming from Stands Fair adblocker for Chrome).
How does ‘working well’ equate to not being owned or run by a nefarious party?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.