One of the reasons I've kept my cMP 3,1 going so long is the ability to add upgrades like a PCIe SSD RAID card to speed up the boot drive, moving up to a more powerful graphic card, adding a USB/Firewire card, RAM additions, and boosting internal storage to 12TB. When I first bought the machine I didn't know I would want most of these upgrades - until I did.
I'm a graphic designer with a small home-based studio. My computer is the main electronic tool I use to earn my living. Keeping it working as efficiently as possible for as long as possible makes a lot of sense for a small timer like myself. Ditching the whole computer three years ago because the startup disk was too slow would have been achievable, but not desirable. I'd rather spend my profits on other things.
Whether I fit the profile of "most users" is irrelevant to me, though I understand why Apple must make such calculations. Nevertheless, one of the primary selling points for the Mac Pro to me has always been the internal options available. It was a very versatile tool, suitable for many different professional scenarios.
That is no longer the case, it appears.
Not every user has the same needs, and I think Apple has missed the mark in that the nMP caters primarily to a small niche of ultra-high end users. That's fine, but in the meantime I find myself in No-Mans-Land when it comes to a purchase option that makes long-term sense for me. The iMac falls short for what I'm looking for, and the nMP is optimized for tasks I never perform. And both machines appear to have been constructed and designed as disposable tools, which I find very disconcerting, especially as a user looking for long-lasting power and utility.
The more I consider the direction Apple has taken the Mac Pro, the more I'm inclined to consider the 5,1 the best option for my goals.
I completely agree with you and I'm in the same boat being a photographer and graphic designer. I have upgraded mine from a 3,1 to a 5,1. I got a 5,1 today with the 3.4ghz 6 core upgraded processor, 48gb ram, 512gb PCI SSD and it was £1200! A similar specced 6 core nMP is £3700! They are 20% quicker and 60% more expensive then you have to get a thunderbolt raid enclosure for the drives which are £400…. just doesn't make sense to spend £4000 for a 3-4 year machine which is already reaching 2 years old and the gpus won't support 5k later on.
Most video guys have switched out their nMP for the 4k retina because its cheaper and supports 5k natively… sums it up.
The fact is that the 5,1 is 5 years old and people are looking at them because its so much value for money and they really aren't that far behind the nMP. There is a lot of life left and all the pereferals owned by cMP owners will fit, they aren't redundant. Like sigmadog I upgraded mine as far as I could and the processors started to be the problem.
Currently if you want to upgrade the upgradable options on the nMP like the processors and SSD… A. the processors are 1/3 the price of the machine so add another £1000, B. Apple branded SSDs aren't available from apple as upgrades, meaning you have to go with a secondary vendor which still cost a fortune like OWCs AURA.
Crazy.
I love the size, the way they look… but as a professional desktop for users like me who want them to last 5-6 years the cost doesn't make sence atm compared to the 5,1. The 5,1 will be great to fill the gap until I see what direction apple go with the 7,1.
I don't think we will see another MP for 2 years anyway, apple don't care about the product. On their website the mini and the pro are hidden you have to click across. They are the Ba***rds of the family.
Last edited: