me too, because even though its early in the contest, it looks like HD-DVD is gonna win out in the format war.iBookG4user said:I would much rather see a blu-ray drive than an HD DVD drive purely from a storage standpoint.
steamboat26 said:me too, because even though its early in the contest, it looks like HD-DVD is gonna win out in the format war.
miniConvert said:Blu-ray please, it has a better name
xUKHCx said:Totally agree, i think with the PS3 coming out blu-ray has a very good chance of suceeding.
Clydefrog said:neither. both are waste of time
xUKHCx said:Totally agree, i think with the PS3 coming out blu-ray has a very good chance of suceeding.
Just one question can i have a link to this $500 HD-DVD player...?zap2 said:I'd a bit divided on this issue, as i like the idea of 25Gbs on a disk, and i like the name Blue-Ray(HD-DVD seems used, because DVD is common) but the price of a blue-ray player is about 1000, when a HD-DVD is about 500(which is not even looking at PS3 blue-ray player, vs 360 HD-DVD player) which is higher then a HD-DVD at. Also the first blue-ray drives on computers couldn't play blue-ray and with mistakes like that i'm uneasy to test the next format to people who would release something that does that(if it was a mistake or on purpose, i don't care, either way it makes them look bad).. also i don't like how Sony is force blue-ray on people with the PS3
zap2 said:Also the first blue-ray drives on computers couldn't play blue-ray and with mistakes like that i'm uneasy to test the next format to people who would release something that does that(if it was a mistake or on purpose, i don't care, either way it makes them look bad).. also i don't like how Sony is force blue-ray on people with the PS3