I think instead of a separate version of OSX, it should just have a "pro" mode that enables extra options that most people don't need.
Add a "no frills" mode to that, and you have an OS I'm willing to actually pay for.
RGDS,
I think instead of a separate version of OSX, it should just have a "pro" mode that enables extra options that most people don't need.
Here's a fun heat transfer problem for you engineers: What would be your case design and CPU/GPU heat sink and fan design (material and surface area and shape, no limits) to get a single non-overclocked Xeon E4-based machine to run as quietly as a 2012 i7 Mac Mini with an SSD?
I think OSX is already "forked" ( rim shot ).
We need a new NeXT. Forstall + Investor $$$ = eating Apple's lunch... computer wise. Apple wouldn't even put up a fight. Cook and Ive want OUT of the truck business. Pro Users don't want Windows.
We should all be sending our requests to Apple. If enough of us demand a real workstation maybe it will happen. After submitting feedback the next page claims it goes to the Mac Pro team.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/mac-pro.html
Personally I've been considering one of the 12 core 5,1's on eBay to replace my 3,1. I'm just concerned that macOS 10.13 will not support them
Cray was selling immersion liquid cooling in 1985. Look up "Cray-2"....That's an amazing thing, an "aquarium PC" -it's too bad that they had to shut it down. Great experiment, for sure. A+
People Are very much interested in a 2012 replacement , is apple though? Doubt it
Simple fact is, they make more profits from idevices. Much easier to sell 3-4 iPad pros and much higher profit margin .
The profit margin on the 6,1 nMP has to be a higher than the Ipad. The cost numbers on the new Mac Pro (6,1) are sky high. And the prices are fixed and controlled by Apple. No deals here.
I remember (once upon a time I used to hang out with a lot of overclocking fanatics) someone stating that the perfect cooling setup is neither liquid water nor liquid Nitrogen. It is immersing/suspending the whole hardware in a decently heat-conducting liquid which nevertheless is fully electro-resistant. I remember some talk about mineral oil...
I have to see if I can find a link...
RGDS,
EDIT: Found it. Mineral oil it is.
https://www.pugetsystems.com/mineral-oil-pc.php
The first iterations of the system did have trouble with heat gathering in the mineral oil (nothing dangerous), but the later versions (more modern components) seem to produce way less heat. Also, methinks, that the original system (clear acrylic case, for visual reasons) is not heat-optimized, and that building the system inside an aluminium box (maybe even with some added surface area) would potentially enable a workstation to be fully silent (fanless).
Pugetsystems have stopped selling their DYI-sets due to licensing reasons, but I bet Apple could afford a license...
James, does this answer suffice?
P.S. My doctorate is not in engineering, but for many years I had thisandthat engineer on my business card...
I remember (once upon a time I used to hang out with a lot of overclocking fanatics) someone stating that the perfect cooling setup is neither liquid water nor liquid Nitrogen. It is immersing/suspending the whole hardware in a decently heat-conducting liquid which nevertheless is fully electro-resistant. I remember some talk about mineral oil...
I have to see if I can find a link...
RGDS,
EDIT: Found it. Mineral oil it is.
https://www.pugetsystems.com/mineral-oil-pc.php
The first iterations of the system did have trouble with heat gathering in the mineral oil (nothing dangerous), but the later versions (more modern components) seem to produce way less heat. Also, methinks, that the original system (clear acrylic case, for visual reasons) is not heat-optimized, and that building the system inside an aluminium box (maybe even with some added surface area) would potentially enable a workstation to be fully silent (fanless).
Pugetsystems have stopped selling their DYI-sets due to licensing reasons, but I bet Apple could afford a license...
James, does this answer suffice?
P.S. My doctorate is not in engineering, but for many years I had thisandthat engineer on my business card...
monkeybagel, what you're describing is known as the mythical xmac. Basically a scaled down cMP. If they're not going to make eGPU work seamlessly, I'd love one.
I don't see a need to fork the OS, we already have the server app. Set up a net boot server that images new machines with FaceTime, mission control, and whatever other fluff removed from the dock - or use MCX or 3rd party apps to manage your apps. EOL with specified support terms though? That would be most welcome.
Honestly I wish they would resurrect Apple Computers for enterprise grade hardware:
- Mac Pro towers
- Xserves
- strengthen the relationship with Promise for enterprise storage
- leverage these relationships with Cisco & IBM to bring us some cool stuff
Pipe dreams...