Fascinating story, and well wear.
It looks gorgeous, and has a surprisingly modern look; Omega were using dauphine hands well into the late 60s, - and I love dauphine hands - my Omega has them - but yours is a lovely, clean, modern classic.
To be honest, I don't like the bloated monsters - some of which also look a bit to 'bling bling' for my test - that are currently fashionable. My personal very marked preference is for those classic, clean, elegant, understated lines the one found - finds - in 50s and 60s watches made by Omega and Rolex (among others).
Anyway, it is gorgeous, and thanks for sharing; long may you continue to wear it and derive pleasure from it.
Interesting comment about bloated monsters, and 'bling bling' which I can generally agree with.
As an example I wouldn't wear a Daytona or any solid gold watch even if given to me, although keeping as an investment would make me think twice. However for those who love those type of watches, that's fine if they give true enjoyment. In fact I'm wondering whether 'maturing with age' may be a factor, as years ago I looked upon the Daytona as the watch to die for.......
Back to perceived bloated monsters. I recall watch-shopping a few years ago in Beruit, Lebanon where I was assisting Middle East Airlines with entry into service of their new Airbus fleet.
In one watch store down-town, the guy opened an old, very dusty drawer and pulled out an Omega carefully wrapped in paper. Asked me to try it on, which I did. It was a new Speedmaster Moonwatch, although at the time I new little about Omegas and certainly nothing about Speedy Moonwatches. It was on an original metal bracelet which felt heavy and I found it somewhat bulky, so declined the offer to purchase although it was within my budget. I often think back to that day, and knowing what I do now, wonder what exact model and year it was, and if I turned down a potential Holy-Grail Speedmaster! Fast forward a few years and now far more knowledgeable on the models, I've been able to acquire Moonwatches with the cal. 861 and the 'must' highly sought-after ST 105.012 'pre-moon' cal. 321. Obviously I no longer find them heavy or particularly bulky, but comfortable and a sheer joy to wear. I've provided photos of these previously, (ref thread #3581 and #3604).
What is bulky and gets very rare wrist time is my Omega SpeedMaster 125, introduced in 1973 as the world's 1st chronometer-certified automatic chronograph. Ok I admit, it's a 'bloated monster', albeit a delightful one!
I must get around to posting a few photos of this amazing watch.
Last edited: