Yeah have eye's on that one myselfThat Attesa is especially awesome. Love the color!
The Casio's are thing to themselves with some being a lot more than many would think...
Q-6
Last edited:
Yeah have eye's on that one myselfThat Attesa is especially awesome. Love the color!
Omega Seamaster from the late 1960s.
To true, I was very close to buying a new old stock 300m Seamaster from a dealer in Australia, sadly didn't work out. Absolutely timeless pieces...Wonderful.
Now, that is a watch I would love to see; I love the classic, elegant, understated, designs of the Omega Constellations and Seamasters from the 1950s and 1960s.
Timeless, classic, elegant, understated, I absolutely love those time pieces, and far prefer them to many of the modern watches, some of which are too large, too gaudy, too garish, for my taste.To true, I was very close to buying a new old stock 300m Seamaster from a dealer in Australia, sadly didn't work out. Absolutely timeless pieces...
Q-6
I like a variety of watches and can see the beauty in all of them regardless of price & size. To me my timepieces are factor of my history and my son's in time. From the basic G-Shock to hand made excellence they are all inexorably tied to me with their own tales to tellTimeless, classic, elegant, understated, I absolutely love those time pieces, and far prefer them to many of the modern watches, some of which are too large, too gaudy, too garish, for my taste.
Moreover, in general, are not too large, not massive, just lovely, elegant classy watches that have - to my eye - a timeless appeal.
You asked if I'd share a photo of the Piet Mondrian design Swatch. It's shown below.I remember when Swatch watches were all the rage; some of them had quite lovely designs.
Please share a picture, if possible.
And delighted to learn that she wears it regularly; the fact that it is worn regularly is a sign of a gift that has been relished and enjoyed and appreciated, and the fact that you have given her something that she enjoys wearing is something that will enhance her enjoyment of - and appreciation of - the watch.
What can I say?
Thank you.
Yes, I did say (well, write) that. I'm amazed (and honoured) that you remembered what I wrote.
However, I wil now add a few words to my original comments.
To all of the gentlemen on this thread, and elsewhere: Find out what she likes, - that is, what her actual preferences are - rather than choosing something that you like and that you think she may like, before allowing money to change hands, and listen to, pay heed to - and remember - what she says, as this may indicate her likes (and dislikes). Indeed, ask her.
In other words, put some thought into what she would like; and think about what is her character, her temperament, her preferences. Not: "I have to get her something", but - "what would she like, and enjoy?"
My mother hated gifts (as do I), - we both love to give them - and gifts that would be treasured required considerable thought, and my father was very good at that (putting thought into appropriate gifts, gifts that the recipient would like).
Two of my very good friends, a married couple - he is a retired judge, she a retired doctor - had a similar story; he told me that she is very challenging to buy gifts for, - not because she is demanding, but because she doesn't want anything - but - and he lit up, delighted, when recalling this to me - recalled how, in their young days, when both were starting out and funds were fairly tight, he had the bright idea of buying a proper doctor's bag for her, and thus, had gone to a well regarded leather business and ordered a handmade leather doctor's bag - which cost "a fortune", in his words, - but, as he added, with evident pleasure, "it is one of the very few gifts I ever got her that she used regularly (for decades) and loved and treasured".
I cannot count (and yes, this has also happened to me), the number of (unwanted, and, yes, stuff that you don't much care for) gifts that women I know have received from their significant others, or, from people who may wish to become their significant others. It is rather trying, because you applaud the thought (and the sentiment behind the thought), while deploring the execution.
As a woman, you are socialised into being polite, and, sometimes, what is produced as a gift may have cost a lot of money, hence, while you don't like it, rejecting it will (rather than just may) hurt the person who gave it, - and you don't want to do that (hence, you may accept it, but won't wear it) - and will seem ungrateful, and perhaps, arrogant.
However, accepting something that you cannot stand, (or simply don't care for) is lying to yourself.
Moreover, if you are in a serious relationship with someone, you do come to wonder how they have come to truly know you so little that they haven't yet worked out that this is something that you don't much care for, or, wouldn't much care for, and - to be candid - this really does come to annoy you, or irk you.
You have been with someone, or involved with them, for a good while, and they haven't worked out what you don't much like, instead, blithely giving you something that you don't much care for.
Is this something that they think you will like, or, is this something that they think you should like?
And, the further problem is that if you thank them fulsomely, and praise them lavishly (even if you are lying through your teeth to yourself) for their kind thoughts, they will simply repeat the performance, and give you more of the stuff that you don't much care for.
However, being assertive enough to state that you don't care for something - if only to ensure that this will not appear as a gift - can come across as arrogance, and used not to be approved of, in women.
I would counsel men to ask - find out in advance specific likes and dislikes - and, failing that, to ensure (in advance, before purchase) that any gift can be returned by the recipient if it does not find favour.
I look forward to it.
Elegant in it own way, style never gets oldYou asked if I'd share a photo of the Piet Mondrian design Swatch. It's shown below.
I mentioned that my wife wears it frequently. We've just returned from a delightful short holiday break in Porto, Portugal. I frequently have difficulty deciding which watch to wear. She never has that problem. Since I purchased this Swatch for her she wears it as frequently as her now vintage Seiko.
View attachment 2278610
View attachment 2278616
Pics or it didn't happen...Omega Seamaster from the late 1960s.
Following your request, here it is. But first the story behind it.........How about taking the Cartier out of the box for the third time and taking and posting a photo so we can see it.
Interesting story indeed. Thanks for posting the photos. Do you have a daughter who may enjoy the Cartier one day?Following your request, here it is. But first the story behind it.........
It starts a few years ago when I was assigned to set up an office in the Middle East to provide technical assistance to a national airline; after 15 devastating years of armed conflict they’d just started to recover and prepare a fleet of brand-new leased Airbus aircraft for entry into service. Although this proved to be a wonderful challenge, it turned out less of a challenge than initially thought, due to the resilience, resourcefulness and generosity of the people, both in the workplace and beyond.
One free day whilst browsing downtown - the centre of which had been ravaged and totally transformed from it's past glory, I came upon a tiny watchmakers shop. It was a selection of high-brand watches and especially the maintenance tooling displayed behind the dusty glass window which particularly attracted my attention. Of course I ventured inside.
Once I started chatting watches to the owner the time just flew by, and during 90mins or so we’d bonded in our enthusiasm. There were several very high-end pieces. A Datejust in stainless steel with gold bezel and two-tone s/s and gold jubilee bracelet particularly interested me, especially the white dial with Roman numeral hour markers. I recall at the time that this watch seemed to jump out from the dusty display case saying ‘buy me, I need a good home!'
View attachment 2282331
Without my requesting, the watchmaker brought his tooling to the counter and removed the back case for me to inspect the movement. I knew far less about watches then than I do now, but what I observed looked exceptional, and the temptation was just too much. There was no original box or papers, but that didn't dampen my enthusiasm.
I was then surprised that he then suggested another model by the same manufacturer which he claimed was far rarer and thus more collectable - probably more expensive too. Dial-wise I preferred the model I was initially attracted too (shown above), so made an offer which was accepted. With hindsight I should have listened to him and his suggestion, as it may possibly have been a Submariner or even a SeaDweller, both of which I then knew nothing about.
By that time, I’d been away from home for many months, and whilst in the same shop my attention was drawn toward a ladies Cartier in it’s original box which, if in acceptable condition I thought would be a pleasant gift for my wife.
Seeing I was interested, and again without requesting it, the back retaining screws were removed to allow me to inspect the delightful automatic movement. If it had been a quartz Cartier I would have passed, but being rather nuts on automatics, I purchased that too - after having negotiated an excellent discount for the two in US$ (in great demand at the time) rather than the local currency.
When I presented it to my wife she was pleased (or was it just to see me home again…….!) But would she wear it? If so would it be ‘just to please the donor?’
View attachment 2282387
View attachment 2282388
View attachment 2282386
Long story short, she’s worn it twice since 1998. The second time she stated, “But it’s stopped!” To which I replied, "Well being an automatic it obviously has as you don't wear it frequently."
Perhaps I should have known better, as she’s a very down-to-earth gal, really not a fan of bling-bling, and unlike myself never goes into stores selling used goods either. With hindsight, knowing that I should have thought twice before purchasing.
Six years ago I had it serviced by a very competent local watchmaker that I’ve used several times before, and it’s remained in it’s box ever since. Shame! So I don't really find it strange now that she continues to wear her lovely little Seiko quartz purchased over 40 years ago, which although never having been given a full service, is still going strong. She loves it, along with her recent Swatch, because (quote) "They're always telling the correct time!"
Bless her!❤️
Your Citizen Promaster Sky, a very nice watch! Although as you say - with a busy dial, which I like and which drove me towards a Citizen Blue Angel World Chronograph. True, setting them up first time is rather a pain, after which atomic timekeeping takes over.Citizen Promaster Sky (PMV65-2271, U680 movement, JDM model) - While I've looked to avoid harsh use with my mechanicals the Promaster has been worn with complete indifference to wear & year.
This watch very much exemplifies Citizen's durability due to it's titanium case & bracelet with Duratec DLC coating. Resultingly is a very lightweight sports watch with a very high level of scratch resistance, now closing on 15 years old and wears very well for it.
View attachment 2281630
Busy; multiple dials and dual LCD display's, has a lot of features for those than can employ them.
View attachment 2281628
Citizen delivers as promised, just a very few hairline scratches after a good number of years of continuous use.
View attachment 2281629
This watch has never been refinished as is basically impossible, due to it's Duratec DLC coating, equally has stood the test of time with the same movement still in use today.
Only downside is, you ideally dont want to completely deplete the battery as the U680 movement is complex to reset from scratch with it generally being better to have patience and let the watch set itself via radio signal.
Q-6
No, and our son especially loves G-Shock's - the uglier the better.Interesting story indeed. Thanks for posting the photos. Do you have a daughter who may enjoy the Cartier one day?
I have not seen that Casio before. A good find for you.No, and our son especially loves G-Shock's - the uglier the better.
I have one particularly loved 'ugly duckling'. A 2008 Casio G-011D-8A which I was lucky to pick up last year for approx US$100 in a 'thrift' store, and was surprised to see that all papers and spare links were present in the can.
I've recently seen similar full-sets listed on the 'bay' for over US$500, and although it seems this model is popular with many G-Shock fans but difficult to find, whether anyone would pay that kind of money is another story.
If you are traveling a lot through time zones the Promaster does have a lot of useful features and on release the likes of Casio was still in it's infancy with it's higher end/smarter looking multi-functional sports watches. Makes sense for Citizen to offer similar styles without the complexity & busyness the U680 movement brings.Your Citizen Promaster Sky, a very nice watch! Although as you say - with a busy dial, which I like and which drove me towards a Citizen Blue Angel World Chronograph. True, setting them up first time is rather a pain, after which atomic timekeeping takes over.
I too just love my Citizen watches. In fact it was my Citizen Eco-Drive 200m Pro-Diver watch (BN0150-10E) that I took and wore daily on our recent holiday, reasons being - had it been lost, severely damaged or ripped from me, a similar new replacement could have been found for a reasonable price.
You'd be very surprised what some are willing to pay for rare Casio's, new or old ones in good condition...No, and our son especially loves G-Shock's - the uglier the better.
I have one particularly loved 'ugly duckling'. A 2008 Casio G-011D-8A which I was lucky to pick up last year for approx US$100 in a 'thrift' store, and was surprised to see that all papers and spare links were present in the can.
I've recently seen similar full-sets listed on the 'bay' for over US$500, and although it seems this model is popular with many G-Shock fans but difficult to find, whether anyone would pay that kind of money is another story.
What can I say?Following your request, here it is. But first the story behind it.........
It starts a few years ago when I was assigned to set up an office in the Middle East to provide technical assistance to a national airline; after 15 devastating years of armed conflict they’d just started to recover and prepare a fleet of brand-new leased Airbus aircraft for entry into service. Although this proved to be a wonderful challenge, it turned out less of a challenge than initially thought, due to the resilience, resourcefulness and generosity of the people, both in the workplace and beyond.
One free day whilst browsing downtown - the centre of which had been ravaged and totally transformed from it's past glory, I came upon a tiny watchmakers shop. It was a selection of high-brand watches and especially the maintenance tooling displayed behind the dusty glass window which particularly attracted my attention. Of course I ventured inside.
Once I started chatting watches to the owner the time just flew by, and during 90mins or so we’d bonded in our enthusiasm. There were several very high-end pieces. A Datejust in stainless steel with gold bezel and two-tone s/s and gold jubilee bracelet particularly interested me, especially the white dial with Roman numeral hour markers. I recall at the time that this watch seemed to jump out from the dusty display case saying ‘buy me, I need a good home!'
View attachment 2282331
Without my requesting, the watchmaker brought his tooling to the counter and removed the back case for me to inspect the movement. I knew far less about watches then than I do now, but what I observed looked exceptional, and the temptation was just too much. There was no original box or papers, but that didn't dampen my enthusiasm.
I was then surprised that he then suggested another model by the same manufacturer which he claimed was far rarer and thus more collectable - probably more expensive too. Dial-wise I preferred the model I was initially attracted too (shown above), so made an offer which was accepted. With hindsight I should have listened to him and his suggestion, as it may possibly have been a Submariner or even a SeaDweller, both of which I then knew nothing about.
By that time, I’d been away from home for many months, and whilst in the same shop my attention was drawn toward a ladies Cartier in it’s original box which, if in acceptable condition I thought would be a pleasant gift for my wife.
Seeing I was interested, and again without requesting it, the back retaining screws were removed to allow me to inspect the delightful automatic movement. If it had been a quartz Cartier I would have passed, but being rather nuts on automatics, I purchased that too - after having negotiated an excellent discount for the two in US$ (in great demand at the time) rather than the local currency.
When I presented it to my wife she was pleased (or was it just to see me home again…….!) But would she wear it? If so would it be ‘just to please the donor?’
View attachment 2282387
View attachment 2282388
View attachment 2282386
Long story short, she’s worn it twice since 1998. The second time she stated, “But it’s stopped!” To which I replied, "Well being an automatic it obviously has as you don't wear it frequently."
Perhaps I should have known better, as she’s a very down-to-earth gal, really not a fan of bling-bling, and unlike myself never goes into stores selling used goods either. With hindsight, knowing that I should have thought twice before purchasing.
Six years ago I had it serviced by a very competent local watchmaker that I’ve used several times before, and it’s remained in it’s box ever since. Shame! So I don't really find it strange now that she continues to wear her lovely little Seiko quartz purchased over 40 years ago, which although never having been given a full service, is still going strong. She loves it, along with her recent Swatch, because (quote) "They're always telling the correct time!"
Bless her!❤️
Take some work to restore as is a mix of fine brushed & polished surfaces looking at pictures of the watch new. Doable with some Kapton tape (high temp electrical tape) polishing compound and the ever trusty Scotch-Brite.Two rapid photos of the G-011D. My dilemma now is whether to lightly polish it and wear occasionally, or leave in original condition and offer for sale on a local site.
View attachment 2285045
View attachment 2285044
My father bought it for me on 47th Street in Manhattan—the Diamond District, famous for featuring in a scene in "Marathon Man."Pics or it didn't happen...![]()
Well it's quite attractive and certainly different. But what is it?