Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I used to overlock my 300 MHz Celeron to 450 MHz. I never thought that it was fun. Not sure what I was doing wrong.
 
Don't get me wrong, I love my Mac Pro, and use it mostly for professional 3d modeling, and animation. Today I was in a Tiger Direct, and saw for the first time how much can be done with a PC. You say Mac's are made to get work done. Well imagine how much work I could get done by overclocking to 4ghz!

4 ghz on four cores isn't going to beat a six to twelve core machine...
 
I have had a Mac since 1984, and currently own a 3.06 12 core. I really wish the Mac Pro was more fun. I mean you can't even overclock it. I look at all the neat stuff for PC's, and sometime wonder why I bought my current Mac Pro. Why can't one overclock? Now with the new Mac Pro, it looks like Appke took boring to a whole new level.

Build a Hackintosh and get your play on. Best of both worlds.
 
Oh man, back in the day I used to have Over-clocking parties all the time. Not sure how I'm still alive today. I'll never forget that feeling of being at school all day thinking to myself "ohhh man, I caaaan't wait to get home and overclock my processor." I'm getting excited just thinking about it now.

Too bad I just have a boring old Mac now, but age takes its toll. Better to leave overclocking to the youngsters.
 
I look at all the neat stuff for PC's, and sometime wonder why I bought my current Mac Pro. Why can't one overclock? Now with the new Mac Pro, it looks like Appke took boring to a whole new level.

You really think professional users (you know, people who get work done) are interested in overclocking? They want a stable machine, that's why they get a mac pro. Time is money, they don't have time to dick around with their computer. They can't afford to waste time to debug an unstable overclocked machine!

Are you 14? Go buy an alienware! It has leds! I am sure it's more fun!
Jesus!
 
Spend some time at your local TAFE, and learn about working with metals and plastics. Then you can build your own completely nuts Hackintosh case, rig it with liquid cooling and a refrigeration unit, and then overclock it to insanity.

It would take a lot of time and money, but it would be fun, no?
 
I used to mess with the zdnet overclock app for my 3,1.
Things would get "zippier", but I couldn't trust it.
Not a good thing for stability and solidity.
Maybe this is apples and oranges, but the slight improvement was not worth it.
 
http://m.wikihow.com/Overclock-a-PC

Not real sure why one would do this think about if for a few clock cycles.

http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-overclock-Intel-CPUs/


http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/overclocking/overclocking-intel-processors.html

Just a poor Intel marketing sham.

Xeon, overclocked ok, why?


Because Tutor has DP systems that score over 40K on GeekBench..

I had a humble 2700K that scored higher than any single processor MP and some of the DP systems.

In the modern world OC'ing causes no instability but it's like anything else the more you know and read the better off you are.
 

Attachments

  • Geekbench Windows.JPG
    Geekbench Windows.JPG
    78.5 KB · Views: 77
  • Geekbench OSX.JPG
    Geekbench OSX.JPG
    85.7 KB · Views: 65
But there are also people out there building their own computers, be they Windows, Linux or Hackintosh based, who do extensive research before purchasing the right components.

When I decided to built a Hackintosh, I spent more than a month to research the components (motherboard, CPU and GPU) and after purchasing them on one day, Windows would run on it within an hour or two of putting it all together. The Hackintosh part was a bit more cumbersome, but that was due to my ignorance about the GraphicsEnabler part.

What I want to say is, that if one wants to build his or her own computer, the more time spent researching the correct parts, the less time spent with troubleshooting afterwards.

Indeed, the stress of a non-functional build can be avoided by doing proper prior planning. But it's worth noting that you still spent a month working on building a computer, without having said computer to get work done with. Which, like in my original post, is fun for some people. So your prior planning method is very valid for the OP's complaint about not enough fun if he enjoys that sort of research - but it's still not a market Apple is aiming for. I didn't mean to imply that ALL DIY builds are prone to glitches.
 
Indeed, the stress of a non-functional build can be avoided by doing proper prior planning. But it's worth noting that you still spent a month working on building a computer, without having said computer to get work done with. Which, like in my original post, is fun for some people. So your prior planning method is very valid for the OP's complaint about not enough fun if he enjoys that sort of research - but it's still not a market Apple is aiming for. I didn't mean to imply that ALL DIY builds are prone to glitches.

You assume that he didn't have a computer to do work with at a productive level, thats probably not the best assumption.

I charge 60 euro an hour to build computers and install software, very few builds run over 120 euro.

When I built my HMWWV I bought the parts at lunch started when I got home from work and had it ready to go and my MP on Ebay by 7PM. Thats running OSX, and restored from my MP's backup.

I'm not Apples target market, but there many of us who do this.
 
You assume that he didn't have a computer to do work with at a productive level, thats probably not the best assumption.

I think it's quite reasonable to assume that somebody who says they want a "fun" computer wants it to actually, you know, compute, in addition to being a fun build/tweak experience. It's quite possible the OP would enjoy the process of doing a DIY PC build, overclocking the CPU, then putting the PC in a closet, never to be powered on again. It's quite possible the OP would enjoy the process of doing a DUY PC build, overclocking the CPU, then selling resulting machine for cost plus labor. But given the post as-is, I think it's very reasonable to assume the OP wants to actually use the machine as well.

I charge 60 euro an hour to build computers and install software, very few builds run over 120 euro.

When I built my HMWWV I bought the parts at lunch started when I got home from work and had it ready to go and my MP on Ebay by 7PM. Thats running OSX, and restored from my MP's backup.

I'm not Apples target market, but there many of us who do this.

That's great. I'm happy for you. I'm glad you recognize which market Apple is targeting, and that you're able to exploit the market segment they aren't focusing on. Perhaps the OP could follow your lead, if that's what he enjoys doing too.

(By the way, what's a HMWWV in this context? Did you mean HMMWV? In military circles, AFAIK the HMMWV is the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, aka the Humvee. Are you saying you installed OSX on a military vehicle as a replacement for a MacPro? Kinda the ultimate in mobile computing I guess. ;) )
 
I think it's quite reasonable to assume that somebody who says they want a "fun" computer wants it to actually, you know, compute, in addition to being a fun build/tweak experience. It's quite possible the OP would enjoy the process of doing a DIY PC build, overclocking the CPU, then putting the PC in a closet, never to be powered on again. It's quite possible the OP would enjoy the process of doing a DUY PC build, overclocking the CPU, then selling resulting machine for cost plus labor. But given the post as-is, I think it's very reasonable to assume the OP wants to actually use the machine as well.



That's great. I'm happy for you. I'm glad you recognize which market Apple is targeting, and that you're able to exploit the market segment they aren't focusing on. Perhaps the OP could follow your lead, if that's what he enjoys doing too.

(By the way, what's a HMWWV in this context? Did you mean HMMWV? In military circles, AFAIK the HMMWV is the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, aka the Humvee. Are you saying you installed OSX on a military vehicle as a replacement for a MacPro? Kinda the ultimate in mobile computing I guess. ;) )

"but it's worth noting that you still spent a month working on building a computer, without having said computer to get work done with"

Here's your quote. I 'll bet he did have a computer to get work done with. People don't integrate new Mac's until they're sure they'll run all the software needed without bugs so spending a month planning and building a computer really isn't a big deal.

Being that the context of this board is computers what do you think HMMWV stands for? Did you happen to click on my profile to see who I work for or did you just ask the question with a bit of wiki?
 
People have different mindsets. This is nothing new.

Some people enjoy working in their garage, on the floor, underneath a classic car. They'll tinker, lovingly, on a car they personally restored piece by piece. The car IS the project.

Other people don't ever want to even see an oily rag. They hop in the car and drive off to wherever they are going. Service? Maintenance? That's what a mechanic is for. The car is just a tool to get the real work done.

Neither guy is wrong or right. They're just different.

I've built several PCs, part by part. I think I was even one of those guys who overclocked the Celeron from 300 MHz to 450 MHz (there was one particular batch that was notoriously stable). Did I have fun? Yes. Would I do it again? No.
 
People have different mindsets. This is nothing new.

Some people enjoy working in their garage, on the floor, underneath a classic car. They'll tinker, lovingly, on a car they personally restored piece by piece. The car IS the project.

Other people don't ever want to even see an oily rag. They hop in the car and drive off to wherever they are going. Service? Maintenance? That's what a mechanic is for. The car is just a tool to get the real work done.

Neither guy is wrong or right. They're just different.

I've built several PCs, part by part. I think I was even one of those guys who overclocked the Celeron from 300 MHz to 450 MHz (there was one particular batch that was notoriously stable). Did I have fun? Yes. Would I do it again? No.

I have a Jeep that requires much time and love :D
 
Every time I see someone drive by in a Wrangler, I think to myself "man, that looks like fun!" :D followed by "... but that's just not practical for my needs". :(

Wranglers are not practical but….

I just took my daughter and her two friends and bags to an amusement park Sunday…Thats about as close to practical as you're going to get.

I think if I got rid of my Jeep my daughter would get rid of me, she loves it as much as I do. :D
 
He wants a 160 Electronics kit.

Urgh, I had one of those when I was little! That's a trip down memory lane, thanks dude. My Dad was an electrician so he bought me one to help me 'follow in his footsteps'.

I remember half of the time with that thing I had no idea what I was doing. There was an instruction manual, sure, but there's only so much fun a hyperactive child can have with making an LED display count upwards. Nonetheless, I painstakingly completed the whole manual, and when I was finished, I realised I knew nothing more than I did before about electronics.

So I decided to improvise some circuits. "How hard could it be?", I asked myself, confidently. Suffice it to say, with my distinct lack of knowledge, it wasn't long until smoke started bellowing from one of the springs. I got scared, pulled the plug on everything, locked it in my cupboard and never used it again.

I'm glad I didn't grow up to be an electrician.
 
I remember half of the time with that thing I had no idea what I was doing. There was an instruction manual, sure, but there's only so much fun a hyperactive child can have with making an LED display count upwards. Nonetheless, I painstakingly completed the whole manual, and when I was finished, I realised I knew nothing more than I did before about electronics.

So I decided to improvise some circuits. "How hard could it be?", I asked myself, confidently. Suffice it to say, with my distinct lack of knowledge, it wasn't long until smoke started bellowing from one of the springs. I got scared, pulled the plug on everything, locked it in my cupboard and never used it again.

Hahaha! That pretty much mirrors my experience too. The instructions were all based on spring terminal numbers: connect 1-31-67-69-71. They didn't do a whole lot of explaining about why you were setting up the connections. (Although I do remember learning the circuit pattern for astable and bistable multivibrators -- not terribly useful for a 12-year-old...) And I too burned up a few of the LEDs because nobody said anything about current limiting resistors.

Oh well... definitely my most fun toy when I was a kid though!
 
Hahaha! That pretty much mirrors my experience too. The instructions were all based on spring terminal numbers: connect 1-31-67-69-71. They didn't do a whole lot of explaining about why you were setting up the connections. (Although I do remember learning the circuit pattern for astable and bistable multivibrators -- not terribly useful for a 12-year-old...) And I too burned up a few of the LEDs because nobody said anything about current limiting resistors.

Oh well... definitely my most fun toy when I was a kid though!

You've definitely put a smile on my face when reading over that. It certainly was a simpler/better time, huh? :)

Well, as the old saying goes … nostalgia's not what it used to be. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.