Mine looked something like this, with half of the bottom chassis being a battery pack.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Other Why are we not DEMANDING a return to replaceable batteries?
- Thread starter pgoelz
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
If the OP had just pulled out his thesaurus and come up with a gentler synonym for DEMAND I think this may have been a very different discussion. Words are powerful things and can mean different things to different people. Many great points were brought up in this thread but some people, myself included, just couldn't get over that word DEMAND. Too bad.
I’d sooner ask for a headphone jack over a user replaceable battery to be honest.
Wonder if Apple realises there are many users outside of the US who are affected. The battery replacement price is still £79 here! 
There is a ton of truth here if people are honest about how they used phones with replaceable batteries.
Big difference in asking for product improvements and demanding a company comply with your wishes
I am not demanding it because I don't want it. I prefer things the way they are. If I didn't I would find something I like.
Look, the point is, companies provide products to their specifications and YOU decide if you can deal with the lack/compromise of features. You have options. Macrumors is a minuscule population compared to society at large.
The rest of us can decide if we want to send it in or bring it in to Apple when the battery starts to die, or upgrade. I personally don’t care about being able to replace a battery myself.
The first two points essentially are one - the size of the battery. The counter point is that while the replaceable battery might be smaller, given cheap and fast replacement over, say, two-three year period of owning the phone you might end up having on average more capable battery than the glued one.
I think you mean water resistance, but if Apple makes the repair, they will follow their own guidelines and procedures to make sure the phone retains its water resistant rating. If a third-party manufacture were to replace a battery, Apple cannot guarantee the water resistance rating if something were to go wrong, because they did not make the repair.
Last edited:
I recall many third party chargers causing fires or hardware malfunction. Opening up to third party battery replacements would be a nightmare of issues. Better to lock it down and even a replaceable battery is not going to be much cheaper if at all cheaper than $29
[doublepost=1514627836][/doublepost]
I think you’re assuming a user replaceable battery is an improvement. Apple does not agree with you otherwise they would offer it.
[doublepost=1514627893][/doublepost]
How did that work out for Nokia? Haven’t seen one in years.
The lack of imagination in this thread is staggering. SURELY there are creative solutions to this problem. The Galaxy S5 for example (top of my head) had ip67 waterproofing (same as iPhone), a removable battery AND wireless charging. Surely if 2014 Samsung could figure it out, there MUST be some solution.
I for one would be 100% on board with a solution that perhaps made the phone a bit thicker and gave it a removeable battery. Everyone and their mother slaps enormous ugly cases on their phones... yet every phone company seems to think we all want “thinner” at all costs.
If user replaceable batteries were such a desirable feature and large percentage of consumers desired it, the market would not be moving almost in unison toward sealed batter design.
One can only assume that (1) streamlined design is more important and other features play a larger role, (2) battery performance and lifespan is sufficient for vast majority ot consumers or (3) other solutions exist to alleviate aging battery concerns more economically or more easily.
I think we see a combination of all those factors playing a role.
One can only assume that (1) streamlined design is more important and other features play a larger role, (2) battery performance and lifespan is sufficient for vast majority ot consumers or (3) other solutions exist to alleviate aging battery concerns more economically or more easily.
I think we see a combination of all those factors playing a role.
To hear the loud DEMANDING of customers, you'd think it would be a lock for any manufacturer to corner next year's smartphone market by simply offering a flagship model with a replaceable battery. Do these manufacturers not like piles of money from their phones flying off the shelves, or do they know something the DEMANDERS don't?
If the phone gets thicker, then the cases will be enormous-er and uglier.
Start thinner, stay thinner.
Of my family's experience with iPhones, some of which are hand me downs when I bought the new phone, few batteries have been a problem.
3G (never replaced battery. Phone became obsolete too fast for it to be an issue).
4 (never replaced battery. Used for nearly 6 years).
5 (never replaced. at about 5 years the battery bulged, phone replaced by new SE).
6 (replaced battery just short of 2 years. Going dead at 14%)
5C (used 4 years. Phone started having other issues, and was out of OS support. Replaced by SE).
7+ (no problems. Still have phone as backup to my X. I decided that the phone was too big).
