Because it’s moving backwards in technology.
In what way?this
In what way?
No problem, Paul, and thank you for your contribution.
One point of clarification though: iPhone batteries are replaceable. Apple has just lowered the price of a replacement to $29 and the largest third-party battery replacement service, iFixit, is matching their price. It's not a swappable battery, but it is easily replaceable, takes less than 30 minutes at a mall kiosk near you.
Apple could have designed iPhone with a legitimately irreplaceable battery. That would have been bad. That's not the case. Go to the mall, get a cup of coffee, pay the $29, done for another 2+ years. Cheaper than an oil change.
One doesn't really have much to do won the other.Because carrying around spare batteries sucks. Sure its nice to get 100% charge in a minute, but keeping spare batteries charged/available when you need them is a hassle. And battery technology has progressed, and charging sources are readily available everywhere now. Wireless charging is improving...soon we'll be able to charge our phones wirelessly anywhere in our homes and businesses.
Theres plenty more reasons why replaceable batteries are outdated technology
Why not demand better battery technology?
Cause the Note 8 or various other ones have exploded as well?I guess you didn't hear about the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 fiasco? The whole thing would have been a minor issue if they could have just mailed out replacement batteries to everyone. Instead, they ended up having to recall an entire generation of their flagship phone.
So you are right... it has never been an issue in the smartphone industry.![]()
One doesn't really have much to do won the other.
What you are mentioning are perhaps hassles or inconveniences or something else more or less personally subjective, not really something that necessarily regresses technological progress in some way.
IMO, wireless is the future. Not replaceable batteries. Consumers want convenience, which truly wireless charging will provide. There will be no need for replaceable batteries in the future
That would decrease the battery life of the device by 30%.With all the talk about battery life, phone throttling, battery ageing, battery replacement cost....... why isn't there a massive tidal wave of us customers demanding that phone manufacturers return to producing phones with user-replaceable batteries?
Apple batteries are engineered to last 1000 cycles. So you've got three years of taking your battery to zero everyday before you reach the 50% mark.Especially in usage scenarios involving a full charge every day (ie., 350 charge cycles per year), battery wear out is a given.... and long before the phone is obsolete.
Plus research and development, engineering, shipping, Apple Genius, electricity, internet, coffee...And finally.... if you think manufacturers made money on your phone, you would be shocked to see what they are making on a $79 battery replacement that consists of a $2 lithium cell, a small cable and connector and some shrink wrap.
The two can exist together without really impacting one another.IMO, wireless is the future. Not replaceable batteries. Consumers want convenience, which truly wireless charging will provide. There will be no need for replaceable batteries in the future
So wireless charged batteries last forever?
Apple batteries are engineered to last 1000 cycles. So you've got three years of taking your battery to zero everyday before you reach the 50% mark.
That’s an interesting point. What exactly is the definition of a “cycle“?
A person who’s iPhone starts at 100% in the morning, runs down to 55% at bedtime, and gets topped off to 100% the next morning. Is that a cycle? Half a cycle? Not a cycle?
I myself have never run an iPhone battery down to zero in a day.
They will still last just long enough to get us to the next cycle![]()
A cycle is 100% recharge. Your example is ~0.45 cycles. If you discharge the battery to 70% and recharge to 100%, then discharge to 70% and recharge to 100%, then discharge to 60% and recharge to 100%, that is one recharge cycle.
Lithium batteries do NOT like to be run down to very low levels, certainly not flat zero.
With all the talk about battery life, phone throttling, battery ageing, battery replacement cost....... why isn't there a massive tidal wave of us customers demanding that phone manufacturers return to producing phones with user-replaceable batteries?
Especially in usage scenarios involving a full charge every day (ie., 350 charge cycles per year), battery wear out is a given.... and long before the phone is obsolete.
Apple's offer of a $29 battery replacement is a good move (and comparable to the cost of a user-replaceable battery), but that low cost is only temporary for one year.
And finally.... if you think manufacturers made money on your phone, you would be shocked to see what they are making on a $79 battery replacement that consists of a $2 lithium cell, a small cable and connector and some shrink wrap.
Paul
They will still last just long enough to get us to the next cycle![]()
Did you perhaps not read my original post? Where I asked the question "Why are we not demanding replaceable batteries"? That was a question. I was not "demanding" for anyone.... you me, or the guy down the street. I received an answer.... "we" are not demanding because "we" (not including me) are perfectly happy with non-replaceable batteries.Why are”you” not demanding. Please don’t act as if you can speak for me and if I want. Tired of you Mac rumors folks who act as if the whole world revolves around you and that the entire forum is a huge monolith and wants and thinks as you do.
Because it’s moving backwards in technology.
this
Not the original intent of this thread. This thread proposed a return to user replaceable batteries to make it easier and less expensive to restore a phone with a degraded battery to like new performance (CPU speed as well as run time). A side benefit would of course be the ability to swap out a discharged battery to get more run time but that wasn't the point I was trying to explore.We've kind of have the multiple batteries thing going on with the advent of the portable charger packs.
I read the original post and laughed at it's insinuation to return to the days of carting around extra batteries. Those old cell batteries could barely last through a work day with the "workload" they were performing and would quickly run through their life cycle at the rate we use our devices these days. How quickly people have forgotten, or are just ignorant, of how crappy those days were that they're so eager to demand them back.Not the original intent of this thread. This thread proposed a return to user replaceable batteries to make it easier and less expensive to restore a phone with a degraded battery to like new performance (CPU speed as well as run time). A side benefit would of course be the ability to swap out a discharged battery to get more run time but that wasn't the point I was trying to explore.
And while we're at it, I just remembered that the very popular (and thin) Samsung S5 had a 2800 mAH user replaceable battery and was water resistant as well. They did it with a gasketed rear cover.
Paul
That is more a function of the phone than of the battery. Lithium cells.... at least the type commonly used in phones..... have not changed much in the intervening years other than to get larger and therefore hold more energy. Phones, on the other hand have gotten FAR more efficient and can run a lot longer and do a lot more on the same capacity (ie., physical size) battery.I read the original post and laughed at it's insinuation to return to the days of carting around extra batteries. Those old cell batteries could barely last through a work day with the "workload" they were performing and would quickly run through their life cycle at the rate we use our devices these days. How quickly people have forgotten, or are just ignorant, of how crappy those days were that they're so eager to demand them back.
I must say.... the contentious level of discourse and misguided logic here have been eye opening to say the least.
Paul