Even better, if we had a standard that can be opened and edited in any app like pdf, html, jpeg.
There already is, it is called the open document format and is supported in all of the MS Office Apps. Unfortunately not many people use it.
Even better, if we had a standard that can be opened and edited in any app like pdf, html, jpeg.
There already is, it is called the open document format and is supported in all of the MS Office Apps. Unfortunately not many people use it.
I have recently been using Pages and Numbers lightly and found it to do most of the things I want and even better than Word. Formatting a page to your liking seems better but I have not used MS Word for a very long time. GUI is easier to use and understand.
For free and free icloud storage and the integration, there is very little for the common folk to pay for MS Office.
Wrong. I replaced it without a problem.Perhaps... but Numbers is a horrid "replacement" for Excel. Period. End of Discussion.
Definitely not usable with complex formulas and pivot tables. Also, it's a no-go if you must share files with Excel users. For all but the most basic sheets, we found Numbers to be insufficient.Wrong. I replaced it without a problem.
It's not a problem for most people doing complex calculations/analysis. But sure, for analyzing large sets of database-like spreadsheets, a pivot table is very helpful. That is why Excel is a useful corporate tool. But for individuals users, even those who do complex professional work, that is not the use case. But if you work in a large organization that compiles and manages lots of data, then I can see why you think Excel is better -- and you would be correct. But to say its a "horrid" replacement (like the prior post I responded to) is silly. If you don't need to use pivot tables, then Numbers suffices for 90% of spreadsheet users.Definitely not usable with complex formulas and pivot tables. Also, it's a no-go if you must share files with Excel users. For all but the most basic sheets, we found Numbers to be insufficient.
It's not a problem for most people doing complex calculations/analysis. But sure, for analyzing large sets of database-like spreadsheets, a pivot table is very helpful. That is why Excel is a useful corporate tool. But for individuals users, even those who do complex professional work, that is not the use case. But if you work in a large organization that compiles and manages lots of data, then I can see why you think Excel is better -- and you would be correct. But to say its a "horrid" replacement (like the prior post I responded to) is silly. If you don't need to use pivot tables, then Numbers suffices for 90% of spreadsheet users.
It isn't clear to me whether people realize that Numbers actually has pivot tables.It's not a problem for most people doing complex calculations/analysis. But sure, for analyzing large sets of database-like spreadsheets, a pivot table is very helpful. That is why Excel is a useful corporate tool. But for individuals users, even those who do complex professional work, that is not the use case. But if you work in a large organization that compiles and manages lots of data, then I can see why you think Excel is better -- and you would be correct. But to say its a "horrid" replacement (like the prior post I responded to) is silly. If you don't need to use pivot tables, then Numbers suffices for 90% of spreadsheet users.
Agreed for the most part. Our company is 80% Windows, and while Mac users dabble with Numbers, it's just not feasible for the exact reasons you mention. The back and forth between the two programs just isn't as consistent as using Excel across the organization.It's not a problem for most people doing complex calculations/analysis. But sure, for analyzing large sets of database-like spreadsheets, a pivot table is very helpful. That is why Excel is a useful corporate tool. But for individuals users, even those who do complex professional work, that is not the use case. But if you work in a large organization that compiles and manages lots of data, then I can see why you think Excel is better -- and you would be correct. But to say its a "horrid" replacement (like the prior post I responded to) is silly. If you don't need to use pivot tables, then Numbers suffices for 90% of spreadsheet users.
Perhaps... but Numbers is a horrid "replacement" for Excel. Period. End of Discussion.
It's not a problem for most people doing complex calculations/analysis. But sure, for analyzing large sets of database-like spreadsheets, a pivot table is very helpful. That is why Excel is a useful corporate tool. But for individuals users, even those who do complex professional work, that is not the use case. But if you work in a large organization that compiles and manages lots of data, then I can see why you think Excel is better -- and you would be correct. But to say its a "horrid" replacement (like the prior post I responded to) is silly. If you don't need to use pivot tables, then Numbers suffices for 90% of spreadsheet users.
Agreed for the most part. Our company is 80% Windows, and while Mac users dabble with Numbers, it's just not feasible for the exact reasons you mention. The back and forth between the two programs just isn't as consistent as using Excel across the organization.
For personal use, I know many people who use it just fine.
I'll chime in about Pages. I do book design using Adobe InDesign. Several weeks ago an author sent a manuscript that she had exported from Pages as allegedly a Word doc. It was unusable -- InDesign couldn't import it properly. Finally I asked for the Pages file and exported from it into an RTF file. Then I imported the RTF file into Word, and InDesign was able to import that Word file. Some formatting was lost, and reworking it was tedious.
During the rest of the production phase, I always need to exchange Word docs with the author, in which we discuss changes/correction -- the file goes back and forth, being saved with a new name each time. Again, Pages was hopeless with exporting the Word doc, so we just shifted to exchanging Pages docs...what a mess.
I'm sure Pages is well-suited to someone working alone. But for collaborative work, especially if it involves other industry-standard formats, it's just useless.
I'll be sure to tell my publisher clients that I'll be handing them a book designed using Pages instead of InDesign. They'll love hearing that! I'll be telling them they won't be getting the PDF/X-1a:2001 file they require, either.when dealing with a file you should always use the same app to work on it