I have 39.7GB cached on my Windows 10 PC and 13.03GB on my Intel Mac Mini... (both have 64GB of RAM)
Where Big Sur does better than windows is when available RAM becomes tight, Windows bogs down sooner.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why is 16GB on Big Sur like 8GB on Windows 10 or 4GB on Linux?
- Thread starter mi7chy
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Where Big Sur does better than windows is when available RAM becomes tight, Windows bogs down sooner.
Uh, it is supposed to use all of it. What good is memory if it's not being used?
If you're suggesting unused RAM being used for file cache, even subtracting that Big Sur still uses double the memory of Windows and triple that of Linux.
Cache, purgeable memory, speculative pages. There is obviously some overhead, especially compared to most Linux distros at their default configuration (services, rich UI etc.). These things have been explained to you repeatedly. I am still confused why you consider idle RAM usage to be of any relevance. What you should look instead is how RAM is handles under pressure. Can Linux sustain more active processes while maintaining responsiveness than macOS, that kind of thing. That’s the relevant and interesting measure of OS RAM efficiency, not the amount of free RAM.
Well, that comparison from your first Post isn't even a Fair one, because your Mac System has 16gb Ram, while the Windows and Linux machine only has 8. You Can't make a fair comparison there.
The OS will use the Ram, that's available. The Mac has 16gb to work with, so it's using that, and fills up more stuff, than it would, if it only had 8gb Ram. And this is just how it should be.
How efficient the OS is using the available Ram has NOTHING to do with how much Ram is used/free after a Boot. The difference will be visible when you push the System to the limits. I promise, a Windows Device will slow down faster than an M1 Mac would on the same Workload.
Second, don't use Task Manager on Windows, it doesn't show you the whole truth. Use Resource Monitor. That will show you your used Ram, cached ram, and free.
I have 32gb Ram right now, 13,7gb are used, 17,7gb are Cached, and 1,1gb are "free".
I'll make a Reboot right now just for the Sake of it, and edit it here. Of course, my System is not a fresh install tho.
Edit: Fresh boot, and just waiting for everything to load.
6,1gb "used", 4,1 gb "cashed", 22~ gb Free.
I am very sure, if i pulled out 3 Sticks and had only 8gb Ram left in my System, it would not have 6,1gb "used" after a Boot.
It uses what's there. If more Ram is there, there is literaly no Reason not to use it, and that's how it should be.
Last edited:
It just seems to me like you're expecting the memory to be sitting there, unused. macOS will use as much memory as you can throw at it.
Monterey seem to perform very well . Same tests in the past did put Ubuntu faster than Catalina in almost all the benchmarks, it seem to be the opposite case now