You know there was a study proving most studies were total BS?
Wouldn't that mean that the study calling most studies BS was, in fact, also BS? LoL
Statistics is a science. Lying with statistics is an art.
You know there was a study proving most studies were total BS?
As several studies have demonstrated, iOS device owners are better educated and earn more money (on average) than Android device owners. This is the marketing segment that considers themselves trend-setters, and this is mostly true as they anchor the bell curve. People want to be "smart and rich" and so they mimic the buying behavior of the upper echelon.
Apple themselves does a remarkable job painting the device as something for the "discerning" consumer. Android doesn't market itself as a brand at all, rather the device makers do. And "I'm a Samsung owner" has nowhere NEAR the "wow" effect as stating "I'm an Apple owner" does. Apple has been cultivating this brand image since the 80's...:.and they are geniuses for doing so.
We both know that a Samsung phone offers far more "features" for the same price as an iPhone. But status symbols aren't about features. They are about brand association.
So simple answer: Apple products are status symbols because they are engineered to BE status symbols. Android phones, almost entirely, are engineered as mass market devices. Arguably, both are winning at their respective games, and Android devices will remain the "poor mans iDevice" as a result.
Marketing 101
Wouldn't that mean that the study calling most studies BS was, in fact, also BS? LoL
I agree that Apple is seen as a prestige brand, but I don't agree that it actually is. I also agree that Samsung's advertising is starting to rival Apple's. In fact they've started to spend much more than Apple in marketing their products.
Which only further illustrates my point. Smartphone ownership in and of itself bestows no status on the owner. There is nothing your 2-year contract offers you that is materially any different than mine at the same price.
What you get is what you paid to get. Any status inferred by owning your device is illusory. Perceived value is just that. Real value is likely identical. And yet these forums and many other just like it are FILLED with proponents of all systems claiming that ownership of their chosen device somehow negates any value for those who choose to own other devices.
This is the basis for all disagreements, whether we are talking phones, race or religion. I choose this. People I like support my choice for this. People who are too dumb/backwards/different from me don't do as I do and are therefore lesser people than am I. Posts become flames becomes name-calling becomes close-mindedness becomes intolerance becomes...,
Well we can stop there hopefully. We have enough jihads over things in this world without adding phone preferences to the mix.
As several studies have demonstrated, iOS device owners are better educated and earn more money (on average) than Android device owners. This is the marketing segment that considers themselves trend-setters, and this is mostly true as they anchor the bell curve. People want to be "smart and rich" and so they mimic the buying behavior of the upper echelon.
Apple themselves does a remarkable job painting the device as something for the "discerning" consumer. Android doesn't market itself as a brand at all, rather the device makers do. And "I'm a Samsung owner" has nowhere NEAR the "wow" effect as stating "I'm an Apple owner" does. Apple has been cultivating this brand image since the 80's...:.and they are geniuses for doing so.
We both know that a Samsung phone offers far more "features" for the same price as an iPhone. But status symbols aren't about features. They are about brand association.
So simple answer: Apple products are status symbols because they are engineered to BE status symbols. Android phones, almost entirely, are engineered as mass market devices. Arguably, both are winning at their respective games, and Android devices will remain the "poor mans iDevice" as a result.
Marketing 101
People think Apple products are superior in every single way, and when you ask them why they spend so much money they say it's for the OS.
...
I then ask them, that if they could purchase the OS separately and use the full Mac OS X on any computer, would they still purchase a Mac? The answer is always yes.
In conclusion, the Apple product makes the user feel superior to all else, and they enjoy showing wealth via a glowing Apple. Why buy an iPad? It's just a giant iTouch... By buying an iPad you are showing that you are rich enough to buy and iPad.
Conversely I don't see many android phones priced at $99, if anything feature for feature they are more expensive than iphones.
I'm sure there are plenty of superficial folks out there that only buy Apple products simply because it is some sort of status symbol, but there are many folks that buy Apple stuff for the utility. I will give you examples of how I use my stuff, which at the moment is all Apple.
AT&T has been offering refurb'd Galaxy S3's for $49.99 on contract. This deal just ended on 11/05/2012. We got two on the office account at that price, both in blue. Minor scratches on the battery cover, otherwise fine.
Would have thought "refurbished" meant "new plastic battery cover that costs a whopping 29 cents" but was a little disappointed this wasn't the case. Apple has spoiled me on "refurbished" meaning "like new."
Yeah I don't see $49 versus $99 making the iphone a status symbol lol. Don't get me wrong, I love my 4s and one reason I don't upgrade to the ip5 is it feels cheap to me after having my 4s, you can imagine how cheap anything else feels (except maybe the N4).
I may be in the minority, but I find the N4 feels far more "blocky" and "plasticky" than even the S3. The S3 form factor is reminiscent of the Apple iPhone 3G/3GS. Sort of a smooth pebble. The N4 feels and looks a bit more like a recent-gen RIM Blackberry by comparison.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder as always.
I agree. Whether people agree with it or not Apple stuff does get attention.
I had my house on the market and literally every single person who viewed our place said "ooo you have a mac".
Depending on peoples definition of "Status Symbol" I'd like to think that people think I have an appreciation for design and that's why I payed a bit extra for an iMac.
I'm a graphic designer and photographer, I've worked in the creative field for about 10 years now and none of Apple's mobile devices appeal to me (except for the MacBook Pro if you want to classify it as mobile).
Apple's iPhone does look 'nice' but in my opinion, its trumped (badly) by the HTC One X and One S (especially the special edition in white).
Also, youre misleading readers by suggestion that all Android phones are plastic and the batteries fall out when dropped. In defense of the battery, at least its removable without voiding warranty and the fact that it *may* pop out when dropped doesn't actually hinder the phones capabilities, not exactly a strong argument either.
LOL. Just two days ago someone dropped their Android in front of me and there it was on the ground in 3 pieces. I looked at him and said "thats why my phone has a sealed battery"
Have you seen HTC results? The are in the decline of declines. As much as the One X and One S are specwhore tour de force phones the problem is as always. People don't buy iPhones because the specs jump out at you. They buy them because they prefer the operating system.
Why do you think that is? Is any smartphone a status symbol of is it just the iPhone?
Because iPhone here in my country is pretty expensive. Sad to say this but people will really look up to you if you have an expensive phone. Sucks big time.
LOL. Just two days ago someone dropped their Android in front of me and there it was on the ground in 3 pieces. I looked at him and said "thats why my phone has a sealed battery"
Because iPhone here in my country is pretty expensive. Sad to say this but people will really look up to you if you have an expensive phone. Sucks big time.
Pinoy i assume you are filipino right ?
Anyway i can relate to that, around here is the same things like a phone and car are considered to mesure your wealth lol pretty sad stuff.
And thats why your phone can't be replenished with a fresh battery if you don't have a place to plug it in, and your phones glass will also shatter if dropped, and you'll shell out 100 bucks for a new battery.
But anyway.
I can't phantom how anyone could see a PHONE as a Status Symbol, at least in the US, the vast majority of people get 2 year contract phones, those who don't care will get a Android phoen for free, those who do care get an iPhone or a high and Android phone.
Typicall the cost is 200 dollars.
HOLY FREAKING CRAP! 200 DOLLARS! I've spent more than that on Dinner taking my GF out to a nice place.
----------
Wow, you must live in a terrible country with horrible people if they judge you over a telephone. What if you drive a half nice car, do they worship you?
I think it's silly to argue Apple isn't a status symbol. It certainly is.
The stress point seems to be the volume button area. These, apparently, aren't from drops. They're just from being in pockets. Maybe making the device only longer wasn't the best idea.
http://www.tekcore.co.uk/2012/10/10/iphone-5-bend-gate/
It's official. Apple was first to make bendable displays. Samsung, prepare your lawyers.
I think it's silly to argue Apple isn't a status symbol. It certainly is. As others have said, it's precisely marketed to be a status symbol. People definitely comment on my Air when I'm out with it, and people most definitely comment on my Thunderbolt display when they come over.
Whether it rightfully deserves it or not, I think that's up for debate.