It is one thing when better tech comes along and older stuff won't run new protocols. (BT 4.0 vs BT 2)
It is another thing entirely when the distinction is "CREATED" via a whitelist that only lets certain machines use the same hardware that is blocked in others.
Yes, Apple has been doing it for years. But now there are no more machines being made that could have different internal parts it is going to be a lot easier for Apple to generously hand features to one machine that another could easily have as well, if Apple had not decided that it's "too old".
I guess part of me just doesn't like the thought process. If I pop the BT 4.0 USB stick out of my 2009 while no internal BT connected I can only connect with "older macs" (direct quote). Put it back in and I get the choice of those poor, limited "older macs" or the other shiny, new, proper machines like mine.
It is another thing entirely when the distinction is "CREATED" via a whitelist that only lets certain machines use the same hardware that is blocked in others.
Yes, Apple has been doing it for years. But now there are no more machines being made that could have different internal parts it is going to be a lot easier for Apple to generously hand features to one machine that another could easily have as well, if Apple had not decided that it's "too old".
I guess part of me just doesn't like the thought process. If I pop the BT 4.0 USB stick out of my 2009 while no internal BT connected I can only connect with "older macs" (direct quote). Put it back in and I get the choice of those poor, limited "older macs" or the other shiny, new, proper machines like mine.