i don't have any thunderbolt stuff.. none.Yes, especially as a 1TB drive can be had for less then $50.
That does explain why you are A-OK with paying for TB stuff.
i have what i just posted up there.
i don't have any thunderbolt stuff.. none.Yes, especially as a 1TB drive can be had for less then $50.
That does explain why you are A-OK with paying for TB stuff.
i don't have any thunderbolt stuff.. none.
i have what i just posted up there.
the last time i bought a hard drive for a mac pro was probably 2012.. it was certainly more than $50.. a lot more iircWell if you were comfy paying $200 for a hard drive then Appleprices make perfect sense for you.
you're right.. nmp is expensive
you're also right.. the days of popping multiple $200 hard drives inside a mac pro are over.
i honestly don't think you're going to find very many people to argue otherwise.
(though just an alternate idea re:storage that may or may not be of use in your case.. instead of strictly thinking thunderbolt enclosures, maybe look into 802.11ac wifi drives.. you get a few advantages.. it's network storage that you can access from multiple computers/devices.. it can double as a fast router.. probably cheaper than thunderbolt storage.. no wires going to the computer..
in addition, maybe consider spending additional $20/month for the 200/20Mbps &up internet.. store off site. similar advantages are to be had as with the wifi storage.
idk.. i don't only see data storage moving from inside the box into another box next to the computer.. storage is moving other places as well.)
a Rockford Fosgate Punch 40 Amp. Was rated at 20 Watts per channel, but at minuscule distortion.
I'm talking about accessing entire sessions... With the 250 GB of internal storage, or even 500, I can only install apps but certainly don't save / open up sessions from. Or do you think people buy the Mac Pro for browsing the web and writing articles?
It's about time this thread turned in one about car audio. I still have this setup!
Now how do I use TB cables to connect it to an nMP?
View attachment 590406
Indeed. This isn't any more off-topic than the preceding 20 pages.
you missed the part where i said "that may or may not be of use in your case"
?
you guys need to get off the whole "the bigger the number, the better such&such is" thing.
i'm willing to bet i spend much more time working on a computer than you.. i generate anywhere from 5 - 50MB data per day.
here's a (dropbox) snapshot of my autosaves on a single file over two hours:
View attachment 590405
(note- sometimes file size shrinks while the project is continuously moving forward.. crazy huh?)
..this file will get another round of work done on it shortly pending project approval.. final file size will probably be around 15MB..
so i keep trying to like my joke from earlier but it won't let me..
View attachment 590410
..what the heck is up with that?
: )
It's about time this thread turned in one about car audio. I still have this setup!
Now how do I use TB cables to connect it to an nMP?
View attachment 590406
in addition, maybe consider spending additional $20/month for the 200/20Mbps &up internet.. store off site. similar advantages are to be had as with the wifi storage.
it doesn't prove anything.What is this supposed to prove exactly?
If I download a DVD that is 4 GB don't I win?
really? nobody gets that joke?You would have to tell a joke first to come back and "like" it.
laugh at it.. i don't care.. i simply mentioned/reminded an idea that's viable/advantageous for many people.. take it or leave it.Assuming you don't live somewhere in which the fastest internet access you can get, for any price, is 4-6/1Mbps, and the idea of cloud file storage or offsite backup is laughable.
Everyone has individual needs, and they are nobody else business. But you all can argue to death about it.it doesn't prove anything.
dude insinuated a 500GB drive is only capable of holding a real user's applications.. certainly not enough to work from unless you're a blogger.
you missed the part where i said "that may or may not be of use in your case"
?
you guys need to get off the whole "the bigger the number, the better such&such is" thing.
i'm willing to bet i spend much more time working on a computer than you.. i generate anywhere from 5 - 50MB data per day.
here's a (dropbox) snapshot of my autosaves on a single file over two hours:
View attachment 590405
(note- sometimes file size shrinks while the project is continuously moving forward.. crazy huh?)
..this file will get another round of work done on it shortly pending project approval.. final file size will probably be around 15MB..
What happened to this thread?
It's now a thread for general discussions of whatever?
A ring for sudden attacks and fighting?
After this round of fights, and some invasions, it has completely lost the connection with the subject.
Please let's make another effort to stay on topic, there are so many interesting things to discuss about the upcoming(?) update...
Is this a conversation ?Well, when there is no update / information on the horizon, why shouldn't we reach out a little and keep the conversation going?
I mean, the equivalent to an AMD Firepro D300 is an AMD FirePro W7000, which was 650 each at launch, 1,300 in total?! I'm paying 1,300 for something I will never end up using, and so do a lot of other people. But they take away all the periphery, no keyboard nor mouse, great...
I have nothing against Apple's design choice, I'd rather staunchly support it, but only if they got their product right, which they don't, not for me and for a lot others.
Link to possible new unveil later this year?
http://www.t-gaap.com/2015/10/5/updated-mac-pros-at-apple-october-special-event
The biggest price involved in workstation graphic cards is for drivers & support and not the hardware. Since I doubt their drivers are not as involved as the PC version it is likely that cost is not passed on to the customer.
no it's not.
you should go buy this car.
drive up a hill.
sue nissan since you're spending more money on gas than their ad states you will.
View attachment 590360
I would assume as much, yet at the other hand Apple's OS and applications are all free or at low prices, so I'm sure they factor that in with the price of the hardware.
There is no Skylake CPU available that would be suitable for Mac Pro computer, yet. Those that are interesting in this context are Broadwell-EP CPUs. And they are due for Q4 2015 and Q1 2016. Also TB3 chipset is most important here.http://www.ubergizmo.com/2015/10/mac-pro-update-october-rumor/
Anyone think this is true?? I really hope it is! I need a new rig and it has been painful to wait.