mainstreetmark said:
You guys are all missing the really big story here!
(at the time of this post)
I doubt even the Mac 128k woulda had that good a rating, had Macrumors existed in 1984.
Are you crazy? The Mac 128K would get universally negative reviews.
"Mouse? WTF is a mouse, and where does Apple get these retarded names?"
"********. It doesn't even have a hard drive. My Lisa can fit ten Twiggy disks on the hard drive. And it doesn't have any expansion capabilities. Millions of options are available for my Lisa. Show me something impressive, Steve. At this rate, I won't be upgrading for years."
"Apple is switching to square pixels? Worst... mistake... ever."
"Look at that bloated worthless excuse for an OS. Think of how much power you'd have running just Microsoft BASIC or something light like that."
"It's only 6MHz faster than my Apple III. Lousy speed bump."
"It's... not... backward-compatible. It can't run Apple II or III or Lisa programs? And wtf is that little slot on the front of the machine. I
know that ain't for floppies. Not my floppies. Great, Steve. I spent $360,512 on software that just became absolutely worthless. **** it, I'm switching to Osborne."
"OMG LOL integrated monitor? 9 inches? I wonder if I could hack in a 10 if I got a curling iron and a heavy-duty stapler."
"Lame. That GUI makes it look like a little girl's toy. If I used something with a GUI, I'd have deep questions about my heterosexuality."
"Yeah, but will it run XENIX?"
"You're an idiot fanboy if you think this was a positive step. Steve's RDF is clearly going to his head. They'll let that idiot do anything now."
"Sorry. Sony already patented Burrell Smith."
This should really be a thread of its own.