It is an expression of the spectrum between full agreement and full disagreement where that person’s feelings are somewhere between.My big pet peeve: "I don't disagree..."
So, you agree?
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right?"I know, right?" (but often "I know" is omitted).
Example:
Person 1: "That movie was the best I've seen this year."
Person 2: Right? It was amazing!
"I know?!" on its own is probably even a better way "to agree" especially when it is re-enforced with intonation.And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right?
No, not in the case that I brought up. The questioning intonation at the end remains. Your example is perfectly fine and I use it all the time.And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right?
Perhaps a questioning intonation in your case represents a slight "disbelief" at your own luck to be embarking on an exciting trip. Context is definitely everything. I doubt that anybody will use questioning intonation with regards to buying a bottle of milk at the grocery store.No, not in the case that I brought up. The questioning intonation at the end remains. Your example is perfectly fine and I use it all the time.
Why are you trying to assign different meaning to what I’ve already explained? I’m not here to learn what it means.Perhaps a questioning intonation in your case represents a slight "disbelief" at your own luck to be embarking on an exciting trip. Context is definitely everything. I doubt that anybody will use questioning intonation with regards to buying a bottle of milk at the grocery store.
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right?
Because you did not explained the question mark. There has to be a reason why it is not always there.Why are you trying to assign different meaning to what I’ve already explained? I’m not here to learn what it means.
Both mean "to agree" minus sarcasm.I'm not following you. "Right" with no upward intonation means something totally different than "Right?" with an upward intonation.
Both mean "to agree"
This does not make an "agreeing" as a fact totally different though, right?Yes, but "right" would be agreeing with a stated fact or answering a factual question, whereas "right?" is a colloquial way of agreeing with an opinion/sentiment.
Scratching my head here. You re-stated what my first post says about "Right." and "Right?".I'm not following you. "Right" with no upward intonation means something totally different than "Right?" with an upward intonation.
Scratching my head here. You re-stated what my first post says about "Right." and "Right?".
So what you are saying is that looking forward to a trip is not a stated fact but a merely an opinion/sentiment?
When I feel the need to say literally I say virtually as it always gets lookHere are few that make me cringe every time I hear them:
1. As someone who works with kids, sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't use the term "kiddo" or "kiddos" instead of "kid" or "kids". It's not as bad as "doggo" or "doggos" (instead of "dog" or "dogs"), but pretty darn close.
2. "legit" used as an adverb. For example, "I legit just saw Tom Cruise at the mall." As an adjective, I don't mind it. For example, "The email you received was legit" doesn't bother me.
3. "said" used by non-lawyers in non-legal contexts to refer back to a previously mentioned person, place, or thing. For example, "I found a pair of sunglasses I like, so I bought said pair of sunglasses." It just sounds utterly pretentious.
There are others, of course, but those are the top 3 at the moment in my head 😂
Conversely, there are words or uses of words that seem to bother many people that I don't have any problem with. Probably the most common would be the use of "literally" in a hyperbolic sense. For example, "That movie was so amazing, it literally blew my mind." To me, that's clear and obvious hyperbole and doesn't bother me in the least, yet for some reason it sends others into conniption fits. They don't seem to accept that words can have totally different meanings and/or connotations depending on context. You may not like that use, fair enough, but it's not "incorrect". I admit the same about the three words I detailed above--they are common, accepted uses, but I just don't like how they sound.
FWIW, I think you did well. Even AI probably have enough info now for self-learning on the subject.That's the last I'm going to post on that one. I'm not sure how to be any clearer.
Thank you! Said better than I could have managed without a full laptop keyboard. The extent of the discussion makes me wonder if it’s a regional thing.I'm not following you. "Right" with no upward intonation means something totally different than "Right?" with an upward intonation. Both "I know, right?" and "Right?" as responses mean the exact same thing and should have the question mark.
Example:
Person 1: "I can't wait until fall and cooler weather."
Person 2: "Right?"
Person 2 is enthusiastically agreeing with Person 1. However, if they just respond with "right" with no upward intonation, then that comes across as, "I'm acknowledging what you said but I don't care either way."