Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Gregg2

macrumors 604
May 22, 2008
7,266
1,237
Milwaukee, WI
"I know, right?" (but often "I know" is omitted).

Example:
Person 1: "That movie was the best I've seen this year."
Person 2: Right? It was amazing!
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: avz

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,895
Stalingrad, Russia
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right? :)
"I know?!" on its own is probably even a better way "to agree" especially when it is re-enforced with intonation.

Another one "I understand" does not have to mean that you understand but it makes the other person "feel better". The same with the above "I don't disagree" which is also all about making the other person "feel better" and hopefully "more agreeable" as a result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

Expos of 1969

Contributor
Aug 25, 2013
4,794
9,433
While not a phrase or word...

air or finger quotations.

The moment someone does that I tune out and lower my opinion of them substantially.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glacier1

Knowlege Bomb

macrumors G4
Feb 14, 2008
10,279
8,960
US
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right? :)
No, not in the case that I brought up. The questioning intonation at the end remains. Your example is perfectly fine and I use it all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,895
Stalingrad, Russia
No, not in the case that I brought up. The questioning intonation at the end remains. Your example is perfectly fine and I use it all the time.
Perhaps a questioning intonation in your case represents a slight "disbelief" at your own luck to be embarking on an exciting trip. Context is definitely everything. I doubt that anybody will use questioning intonation with regards to buying a bottle of milk at the grocery store.
 

Knowlege Bomb

macrumors G4
Feb 14, 2008
10,279
8,960
US
Perhaps a questioning intonation in your case represents a slight "disbelief" at your own luck to be embarking on an exciting trip. Context is definitely everything. I doubt that anybody will use questioning intonation with regards to buying a bottle of milk at the grocery store.
Why are you trying to assign different meaning to what I’ve already explained? I’m not here to learn what it means.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
And when the "I know" is omitted, so is the question mark. (As it should be in the original post that started this.) I hear this all the time from a family member on the phone. "Right. Right." (with no questioning intonation) My first post about the question mark did not include the "I know". Right? :)

I'm not following you. "Right" with no upward intonation means something totally different than "Right?" with an upward intonation. Both "I know, right?" and "Right?" as responses mean the exact same thing and should have the question mark.

Example:
Person 1: "I can't wait until fall and cooler weather."
Person 2: "Right?"

Person 2 is enthusiastically agreeing with Person 1. However, if they just respond with "right" with no upward intonation, then that comes across as, "I'm acknowledging what you said but I don't care either way."
 

nielshutch

macrumors member
Oct 1, 2021
44
17
He "allegedly" buried an axe into his wife's skull.

But I clearly saw it on the video!
Or was that all AI? (Surely Tom Hanks would never do such a thing!)

So confusing – I"ll just pop off to boil up the water for dinner...
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Both mean "to agree"

Yes, but "right" would be agreeing with a stated fact or answering a factual question, whereas "right?" is a colloquial way of agreeing with an opinion/sentiment.
 

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,895
Stalingrad, Russia
Yes, but "right" would be agreeing with a stated fact or answering a factual question, whereas "right?" is a colloquial way of agreeing with an opinion/sentiment.
This does not make an "agreeing" as a fact totally different though, right?

So what you are saying is that looking forward to a trip is not a stated fact but a merely an opinion/sentiment? As in example provided by the OP. At this stage I just hope that the actual "trip" is a fact and has been properly booked and not is just an intent to go on a trip.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knowlege Bomb

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Scratching my head here. You re-stated what my first post says about "Right." and "Right?".

What I'm specifically disagreeing with you on is your statement, "And when the 'I know' is omitted, so is the question mark." Both "I know, right?" and "Right?" mean the same thing; the latter is simply a shortened form of the former. If you remove the question mark from "Right?" it totally changes its meaning. So:

If Person 1 says, "I'm so looking forward to some cooler weather!"

"I know, right?" in response means, "Me too!"
"Right?" in response means, "Me too!"
"Right" in response means, "ok" (as in, I'm acknowledging what you said, but neither agreeing nor disagreeing)

That's the last I'm going to post on that one. I'm not sure how to be any clearer.
 
Last edited:

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
So what you are saying is that looking forward to a trip is not a stated fact but a merely an opinion/sentiment?

Correct. It's simply an expression of how you feel about the trip. Now, once that person has stated their enthusiasm for the trip, the fact that they stated that becomes a . . . well, fact. But the statement itself is simply their opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avz

SlipSlidinAwa

macrumors member
Mar 31, 2014
81
9
Fort William, Scotland, UK
Here are few that make me cringe every time I hear them:

1. As someone who works with kids, sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't use the term "kiddo" or "kiddos" instead of "kid" or "kids". It's not as bad as "doggo" or "doggos" (instead of "dog" or "dogs"), but pretty darn close.

2. "legit" used as an adverb. For example, "I legit just saw Tom Cruise at the mall." As an adjective, I don't mind it. For example, "The email you received was legit" doesn't bother me.

3. "said" used by non-lawyers in non-legal contexts to refer back to a previously mentioned person, place, or thing. For example, "I found a pair of sunglasses I like, so I bought said pair of sunglasses." It just sounds utterly pretentious.

There are others, of course, but those are the top 3 at the moment in my head 😂

Conversely, there are words or uses of words that seem to bother many people that I don't have any problem with. Probably the most common would be the use of "literally" in a hyperbolic sense. For example, "That movie was so amazing, it literally blew my mind." To me, that's clear and obvious hyperbole and doesn't bother me in the least, yet for some reason it sends others into conniption fits. They don't seem to accept that words can have totally different meanings and/or connotations depending on context. You may not like that use, fair enough, but it's not "incorrect". I admit the same about the three words I detailed above--they are common, accepted uses, but I just don't like how they sound.
When I feel the need to say literally I say virtually as it always gets look :cool:
 

KaiFiMacFan

Suspended
Apr 28, 2023
322
647
Brooklyn, NY
"daily driver" reminded me that I'm always wary of the phrase "data-driven". The phrase isn't bad to use per se, but it is one of those phrases that doesn't tell the whole story and is meant to give a veneer of credibility or even infallibility to whatever is being discussed. "This time, we're taking a data-driven approach". Well, sure, data is important. But where does that data come from and who's gathering that data? Who's funding the gathering of that data? There's this sense of "well, it's the data, you can't argue with it".
 
Last edited:

Knowlege Bomb

macrumors G4
Feb 14, 2008
10,279
8,960
US
I'm not following you. "Right" with no upward intonation means something totally different than "Right?" with an upward intonation. Both "I know, right?" and "Right?" as responses mean the exact same thing and should have the question mark.

Example:
Person 1: "I can't wait until fall and cooler weather."
Person 2: "Right?"

Person 2 is enthusiastically agreeing with Person 1. However, if they just respond with "right" with no upward intonation, then that comes across as, "I'm acknowledging what you said but I don't care either way."
Thank you! Said better than I could have managed without a full laptop keyboard. The extent of the discussion makes me wonder if it’s a regional thing.

In regards to the daily driver discussion, I’ve seen it used a lot more in the mobile device sphere or its original meaning, in cars. I would say a garment hanger is a strange example and probably isn’t representative of the actual usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usagora
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.