Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That is really weird!

Here's one that I just can't stand: when I say something that someone agrees with, and they shout, "FACTS!" Why is that necessary???

I’m fine with that one in — this is key — casual conversation between/amongst friends.

“Facts” and “all facts here” (used in similar circumstances as “mood” and “big mood”) saves time/breath/energy on “I completely agree with you” or “I don’t dispute that at all” (or, respectively, “I am sharing in this emotion”).
 
  • Like
Reactions: rm5

Scepticalscribe

Suspended
Jul 29, 2008
65,135
47,525
In a coffee shop.
This very thread is about language, above all, language that people are irked by, (irrespective of whether they can express why they are irked by it).

And I am irked by this monosyllabic impenetrable use of slang, especially coarse and crude slang.

Just because some may think that the use of this language sounds cool and makes them seem cool does not excuse such uncouth language. Moreover, excess use of foul language dilutes its power.

And furthermore, while parsimony re money, material goods or compliments is one thing, (and not to be commended), parsimony in language - an unwillingness to expend syllables, seeking refuge in the extraordinarily limited monosyllabic vocabulary of modern English swearing - especially a language as amply supplied and well endowed with a vast, rich and glorious vocabulary such as English, is greatly to be deplored.
 
Last edited:

VisceralRealist

macrumors 6502a
Sep 4, 2023
636
1,755
Long Beach, California
Well, I had no idea "sus af" was going to generate so much discussion, but hey, I'm all for it. 😁

I use all kinds of slang and abbreviations in my casual writing, including any number of idiosyncratic forms with friends who'll understand them (which admittedly wouldn't be of much utility here). "sus" and "af" are frequently associated with Gen Z, though I've seen people of various ages use them.

I'm not usually bothered by slang, though there is some "terminally online" language that gets on my nerves ("terminally online" is itself a very online term). For example, I could do without "grindset" and its associated term "sigma male". In fact, any Greek letter followed by the word "male" can disappear from the lexicon for all I care.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
For example, I could do without "grindset" and its associated term "sigma male" . . .

Hadn't heard either of those terms before, so I used Google (ahem) to immediately find out what they meant. Agree we could do without those. I had only heard or "alpha male" and "beta male" before and those are even more revolting in how they're used/abused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VisceralRealist

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
I don't remember if this has been mentioned before, but the term "Karen" is so overused that it has become meaningless. It originally referred to a person that was a busybody and made a federal case out of every little thing. However, I've noticed it's now just being used as a mindless, catch-all insult online when someone simply disagrees with you, even if your post has nothing to do with being meddling or vindictive.

Person 1: "I like the new model of this car."
Person 2: "It's ok, but I'm not a fan of the new console design."
Person 3 (to Person 2): "Ok, Karen."
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon

rm5

macrumors 68030
Mar 4, 2022
2,958
3,402
United States
I found this list of texting abbreviations (I found a better one a few days ago, but I can't find it anymore for whatever reason), some of these are just weird!!

 
  • Like
Reactions: VisceralRealist

Expos of 1969

Contributor
Aug 25, 2013
4,794
9,433
I don't remember if this has been mentioned before, but the term "Karen" is so overused that it has become meaningless. It originally referred to a person that was a busybody and made a federal case out of every little thing. However, I've noticed it's now just being used as a mindless, catch-all insult online when someone simply disagrees with you, even if your post has nothing to do with being meddling or vindictive.

Person 1: "I like the new model of this car."
Person 2: "It's ok, but I'm not a fan of the new console design."
Person 3 (to Person 2): "Ok, Karen."
Similar situation to those dimwits who think "Boomer" is an intelligent, cutting, witty comeback.
 
I don't remember if this has been mentioned before, but the term "Karen" is so overused that it has become meaningless. It originally referred to a person that was a busybody and made a federal case out of every little thing. However, I've noticed it's now just being used as a mindless, catch-all insult online when someone simply disagrees with you, even if your post has nothing to do with being meddling or vindictive.

Person 1: "I like the new model of this car."
Person 2: "It's ok, but I'm not a fan of the new console design."
Person 3 (to Person 2): "Ok, Karen."

Maybe its recent (and relative) overuse (and even poor application of its use) has diluted its punch, but it’s also filled a longstanding void in everyday vernacular for which there was already a gendered equivalent for men (see below).

In my circles, there remain a couple of select folks we know of in our local community, for which no other word — for worse or better — more fittingly describes who those folks are and the levels of harassment (and even stochastic violence) they are known to invoke toward others who not only unsettle them (often, directing their “karening” toward others who are, generally, living a better life than they are and, thus, why they’ve earned that ignoble title), but also look down upon as inferior/subordinate to their own (perceived) station.

tl;dr: Sometimes new slang sticks because the slang works and no better alternative is in wide use.

“Karen”, at least for me, is the feminine of the masculine “Dick” (as in, “Van Patten”, “York”, “Sargent”, etc.), but the paths of those earning those distinctions run pretty different.

The former usually does so by summoning authority figures (e.g., “managers”, “supervisors”, the police, whatever) to bend others to their own will and/or whims. The latter, usually pretty aggressive, tends to take matters into their own (overtly violent) hands. (A common example: some dude in a truck and road raging all over the place.)

“Boomer” almost sounds like some sort of nautical sailing term.

“How say you, Donald Fagen?”

eoy1w0f6pdc41.jpg


Isn’t that also what they call submarines that carry nuclear missiles.

Whoa. (!!!)
 

VisceralRealist

macrumors 6502a
Sep 4, 2023
636
1,755
Long Beach, California
I found this list of texting abbreviations (I found a better one a few days ago, but I can't find it anymore for whatever reason), some of these are just weird!!


So where does "uwu" fit in all of this? I guess that's not really an abbreviation technically, but I do see it in texting.

Similar situation to those dimwits who think "Boomer" is an intelligent, cutting, witty comeback.

Eh, I don't think anyone really thinks it's witty or intelligent. It's something said to rile someone up and piss them off (which it does seem to accomplish).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LedRush

Kung

macrumors 6502
Feb 3, 2006
485
496
That is really weird!

Here's one that I just can't stand: when I say something that someone agrees with, and they shout, "FACTS!" Why is that necessary???

Could not agree more!

...because everyone knows you have to shout "Hashtag FACTS!"

;)
 

Chuckeee

macrumors 68040
Aug 18, 2023
3,015
8,645
Southern California
“Karen”, at least for me, is the feminine of the masculine “Dick” (as in, “Van Patten”, “York”, “Sargent”, etc.), but the paths of those earning those distinctions run pretty different.
I ask my “ social media savvy” daughter about this. She said that the masculine equivalent of “Karen” is actually “Chad”, and “dick” is an adjective to describe their stereotypical behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kung

Kung

macrumors 6502
Feb 3, 2006
485
496
I ask my “ social media savvy” daughter about this. She said that the masculine equivalent of “Karen” is actually “Chad”, and “dick” is an adjective to describe their stereotypical behavior.

Yup. Confirmed with my source (aka son lol).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee

yaxomoxay

macrumors 604
Mar 3, 2010
7,439
34,275
Texas
I hate when journalists use “blasts” to indicate disagreement. Was distractingly watching the news yesterday at the gym and the banner said “Politician X blasts politician Y.” The blast simply referred to a disagreement on Twitter/X.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Yeah, everything's overdramatized, because people have become so inured to sensationalism that EVERYTHING must be dramatized.

Problem with that is it just teaches us to either ignore or play down EVERYTHING, or become triggered by EVERYTHING.

In that vein, I've noticed for a long time that the new meaning of the word "hate" is, "when someone disagrees with personal choices you've made or positions/opinions you hold."

Person 1: "I love the new Batman movie!"
Person 2: "It was probably my least favorite one."
Person 1: "Hater!"

The same cheapening is being done with other words as well. It also goes the other way, with words like "love." Do you really "love" that ice cream? Don't you mean you just really like it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yaxomoxay
I ask my “ social media savvy” daughter about this. She said that the masculine equivalent of “Karen” is actually “Chad”, and “dick” is an adjective to describe their stereotypical behavior.

My understanding is that a “Karen” and a “Chad” are not homologous in the slightest. Rather, the “involuntarily celibate” (mostly) men place “Chads” and “Stacys” together as being their own thing (and bore out by the horrific rental van massacre in Toronto back in 2018).

Again, “Karens” and “Dicks” are insufferable — not due to their perceived “ideal” station in life, per the above — but because of their distinctly boorish (and heavily gendered) conduct toward near-absolute strangers they deem as inferior to themselves (for whatever reason). Some of that is, no doubt, informed by other structural placements they’ve inherited along the way, coupled with their perception that those stations have lost some of their sheen/punch/tacit entitlements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

yaxomoxay

macrumors 604
Mar 3, 2010
7,439
34,275
Texas
My understanding is that a “Karen” and a “Chad” are not homologous in the slightest. Rather, the “involuntarily celibate” (mostly) men place “Chads” and “Stacys” together as being their own thing (and bore out by the horrific rental van massacre in Toronto back in 2018).

Again, “Karens” and “Dicks” are insufferable — not due to their perceived “ideal” station in life, per the above — but because of their distinctly boorish (and heavily gendered) conduct toward near-absolute strangers they deem as inferior to themselves (for whatever reason). Some of that is, no doubt, informed by other structural placements they’ve inherited along the way, coupled with their perception that those stations have lost some of their sheen/punch/tacit entitlements.
I am confused by the Chad. I have witnessed my kids use it as a male Karen but also as a “guy that gives no f-“.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee

Mousse

macrumors 68040
Apr 7, 2008
3,649
7,086
Flea Bottom, King's Landing
That is really weird!

Here's one that I just can't stand: when I say something that someone agrees with, and they shout, "FACTS!" Why is that necessary???
I use "testify" Bart Simpson style.
tenor.gif

So where does "uwu" fit in all of this? I guess that's not really an abbreviation technically, but I do see it in texting.
I've seen variations like 0w0.

As an avid anime otaku, I have seen it plenty of times. It's the cat smile a character does before doing something mischievous. While I'm not certain, I've pretty confident that I'm right.
b169502-txzgy0NraqDY.png
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.