Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,895
Stalingrad, Russia
Remember hearing someone talk about the "3 second rule". "if you drop your food on the floor it is OK to eat if you pick it up in 3 seconds". A lot of people evidently believe it and feel it is obvious. I had never even heard of it, and of course it is quite wrong, although I had heard of a 1 second rule. Some things are quite commonly believed within certain groups who believe that everyone thinks the same thing.

As such need documented sources supporting your statement which is as alien to me as the 3 second rule.
I guess the use of the language will depend on what "level" you intend to function in a society. I would agree that the need "to communicate" is not necessary or obvious at all.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
You have stated that you don't like the following words/phrases, all which are modern slang and/or text speak:

legit
hella
convo
my guy/man
OG

I have only sampled a few of your annoyances, as I was not about to reread all 65 pages. And yet,



doesn't seem to bother you, even though it is very much modern slang. The traditional way to say it would be "cringeworthy" but the texting/slang version cuts out over half the letters.

Based on all that I have read from you in this thread, the use of "cringe" in the manner that you did should rate highly on your list of annoyances.

Um, ok? When did I ever state that every "modern slang" term annoys me? There's plenty that don't. Not sure why you're trying to paint me into a corner or make this about me personally in the first place. There's no science to this, and I'm just one among many posters here.

Also, I've posted numerous terms that aren't even slang at all, even just today ("smacks of").
 
Last edited:

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Not at all. Until this year never watched Curb Your Enthusiasm either.

That was just one example out of many in comedy. It's certainly not limited to one TV show or any other form of comedy.
 
Last edited:

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,057
50,570
Um, ok? When did I ever state that every "modern slang" term annoys me? There's plenty that don't. Not sure why you're trying to paint me into a corner or make this about me personally in the first place. There's no science to this, and I'm just one among many posters here.
Oh, for crying out loud. I am not painting you into a corner. I merely expressed my surprise at phrase that doesn't annoy you. You do have a fairly long list. There's no malice or contempt or derision in my statement. It's simply an observation.

You want to talk about things to be annoyed about? omg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B S Magnet

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Oh, for crying out loud. I am not painting you into a corner. I merely expressed my surprise at phrase that doesn't annoy you. You do have a fairly long list. There's no malice or contempt or derision in my statement. It's simply an observation.

You want to talk about things to be annoyed about? omg.

Maybe ask yourself why my last reply elicited such an emotional reaction from you and why you literally went looking for multiple of my past posts to hyperlink. There's no rhyme or reason to these things, which has been glaringly obvious throughout this thread. Yet you claimed that a certain word "should" annoy me based on other completely independent examples. That sure sounds like you're trying to paint me into a corner to me.

This is a highly individual, subjective topic, so it shouldn't be any surprise that you don't understand why certain words do and don't annoy me, nor why I don't understand why certain words do and don't annoy you. There's no flow-chart to follow.

I mean, I appreciate all the attention, but this thread isn't about me.
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,057
50,570
Maybe ask yourself why my last reply elicited such an emotional reaction from you and why you literally went looking for multiple of my past posts to hyperlink. There's no rhyme or reason to these things, which has been glaringly obvious throughout this thread. Yet you claimed that a certain word "should" annoy me based on other completely independent examples. That sure sounds like you're trying to paint me into a corner to me.

This is a highly individual, subjective topic, so it shouldn't be any surprise that you don't understand why certain words do and don't annoy me, nor why I don't understand why certain words do and don't annoy you. There's no flow-chart to follow.

I mean, I appreciate all the attention, but this thread isn't about me.
Lol, my "emotional reaction" was on par with an eye roll 🙄 not being angry 😡 (here is the benefit of emojis).

You asked a question for clarification, which I gave. You are the one getting defensive. Again, I merely made an observation, and never did I say you were wrong, inconsistent, stupid, or any other negative adjective. Nor did I ask for rhyme or reason, or even an explanation. I simply stated my surprise at which word slipped through the "okay" gate. Plenty of people here are inconsistent in what annoys them. And others have remarked on those as well.

You seem rather defensive about this, which is the emotional reaction.
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Lol, my "emotional reaction" was on par with an eye roll 🙄 not being angry 😡 (here is the benefit of emojis).

You asked a question for clarification, which I gave. You are the one getting defensive. Again, I merely made an observation, and never did I say you were wrong, inconsistent, stupid, or any other negative adjective. Nor did I ask for rhyme or reason, or even an explanation. I simply stated my surprise at which word slipped through the "okay" gate. Plenty of people here are inconsistent in what annoys them. And others have remarked on those as well.

You seem rather defensive about this, which is the emotional reaction.

And you're not being defensive here? Ok. And simply defending oneself is not emotional by default. It can be. I was clearly not. You, on the other hand, were clearly emoting in your response, like you were just so exasperated with me.

The concept of "consistency" doesn't even come into play here, because there's no guiding principle. That's what I'm trying to tell you. In your "clarification," you stated that the word cringe "should rate highly on your list of annoyances." Key word I've been taking exception to there is "should." That's not the same thing as saying, "I'm surprised it's not on your list of annoying words." It's implying that I've been espousing some sort of principle for which words annoy me and that I'm somehow breaking with that principle on this particular word. That's simply not true.

I'm done with this particular rabbit trail in this discussion. Thanks.
 

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,895
Stalingrad, Russia
The concept of "consistency" doesn't even come into play here, because there's no guiding principle.
I am wondering if you view an annoyance as a way for your body to communicate an important "message"? Some people might even say that it is a good idea to write down your dreams.

Or you are more like: everything(including your body responses) is random. No expectations, no disappointments is the only way to deal with life if you want to remain sane.
 
I mean, I appreciate all the attention, but this thread isn't about me.

Just a reminder:

1) This thread was struck into being by you.

2) The chief contributor of this thread, throughout its entire evolution, has been you.

3) A dislike for a word, though supported by logical reasons, gets weighted heavily by one’s emotional response around that word’s existence/use.

Anyhow, back to this discussion.
 

polyphenol

macrumors 68020
Sep 9, 2020
2,123
2,594
Wales
When people say something "smacks of" something, meaning it has a certain undertone or implication. e.g. "All this reporting smacks of a big coverup."

Why does "smacks of" cause any issues?

As I understand, it just means there's a taste or smell of whatever. So very like there being a whiff or stink of corruption (or whatever).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

Gregg2

macrumors 604
May 22, 2008
7,267
1,237
Milwaukee, WI
Not really a word, but a particular clip that certain modern women have (distinction necessary), where the final word in a sentence has "...uh" appended to it. It usually happens when said women (I've only heard women/girls do this) are exasperated, i.e. "Come on-uh!" or "Why do I have to work-uh?"
I hear several of our local TV news reporters, all female, inserting "uh" between an adjective and a noun or verb, as if it was a real word that somehow fits into that spot. They don't do it all the time, of course, but I can be sure that I'll hear it at least once in a half-hour news broadcast. It's very uh noyining. (doesn't fit there; would be a double-uh)
 

andyw715

macrumors 68000
Oct 25, 2013
1,844
1,404
(I'm sure these are mentioned somewhere in this thread but I don't feel like reading it all :)

"This"
"Same"
"Grok"

Most office space terms, especially "Out of pocket"

And most annoying is people that end any and all of their sentences in an inflection of question.

ie "My favorite ice cream is chocolate [?]"
I dunno, is it? Why are you asking me?
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
Why does "smacks of" cause any issues?

As I understand, it just means there's a taste or smell of whatever. So very like there being a whiff or stink of corruption (or whatever).

I never said it caused any issues, nor do I have any trouble understanding its meaning (I literally explained what it means in my post). I just hate the way it sounds, thus it annoys me (see thread title).
 

decafjava

macrumors 603
Feb 7, 2011
5,502
8,013
Geneva
Ooof, “based” is a word, in that specific usage, which really gets beneath my skin. Good work.
Yup I blocked a fellow on social media who used that word. Well also because he is an idiot, I knew him from a now defunct military history website whose former members that moved to FB. Actually others were also "cringeworthy".
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Original poster
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,456
We need a thread for words that we like, even if we don't know why. Instead of "cringe", everything will be "based". :p

Had to look that one up--never heard it used before. To me, the difference is "cringe" describes exactly how I physically react to hearing certain things, whereas "based" imo is just an awkward, convoluted way of saying "agreed."

 
Had to look that one up--never heard it used before. To me, the difference is "cringe" describes exactly how I physically react to hearing certain things, whereas "based" imo is just an awkward, convoluted way of saying "agreed."

Devoid of the PRSI baggage, sure. But its use was born from a very PRSI-esque point of origin, used by and for a specific population. Again, that’s PRSI land.
 

VisceralRealist

macrumors 6502a
Sep 4, 2023
636
1,755
Long Beach, California
Okay, here's one:

Misinterpreting voilà as wallah. The latter is especially common the US (both in pronunciation and in spelling). People don't seem to recognize that voilà is actually French for "look there!" and hear it as nonsense syllables or onomatopoeia of some kind, like ta-da (which may be an imitation of a fanfare).
 
  • Like
Reactions: B S Magnet
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.