Aloha everyone,
I've had my issues with Windows ever since I bought my first PC back 1994. I had to spend hours on the phone with various manufacturer's tech support personnel, in what turned out sometimes to be a vain attempt to get some third party hardware/software working with Windows 3.1.1/95/98/Me/2000 and XP. I tried to install OS2 Warp, but it didn't recognize my CD drive. Bummed, I continued using Windows until I read about Redhat Linux 5.3, which took me two days to load (I had to search for a lot of drivers, then get help with XFree86 configuration - while using a 33.3kbps modem). I really like the fact that it was 1.) NOT Windows and 2.) free.
That being said, Windows OSs got progessively better as time went on. I personally think that, with the exception of not supporting hyperthreading, Windows 2000 was probably the best client OS Microsoft has produced yet - Windows Server 2003 is most likely the best server OS they've produced, but I never worked with Windows Server 2000. Windows ME was, IMHO, a thinly-disguised virus foisted on Windows user, including myself, as it was pre-installed on the first laptop I purchased.
I stayed with Redhat Linux, off and on, all the way through Fedora Core 5, but it didn't quite do everything I wanted to do, in the manner I chose. I wanted a Windows-free alternative, but one more mainstream than Linux. The biggest issue I have with Linux, however, is not that it isn't a very nice OS (which it is), but that with over 175 different flavors (and it's probably way more than that), you get too much of a good thing. For example, directory structure is inconsistent between the various distros, the packaging progs are different, and some just work better than others with specific hardware sets.
I was also one who took in the Microsoft FUD - hook, line, and sinker. It was easy to believe that Apple made overpriced, inferior computers - I didn't know many people who had Macs, and also thought that the quality of an OS was evidenced by the amount of available software. I also thought that since Apple insisted on designing and creating both the hardware and software, they were forced to overcharge their customers. Furthermore, I was unaware of any possible interoperability between the two OSs, so why bother? After all, I was still using Linux, right?!?
Here's what finally put me over the edge. I had a computer custom-built for me in December 2003, with all the latestt and greatest cutting-edge components. I later upgraded my DVD burner with a dual-layer one, purchased the lattest version of Nero, and ensured that it was fully updated and patched. I normally record the Tour de France on my HDD, edit out the commercials, then record it to DVD. Up until this year, I was precluded from using dual-layer discs, but after upgrading, I felt sure that everything would work fine. Much to my chagrin, out of 7 discs, I was only able to successfully burn 2! The dual-layer discs were $25 for 10, so I wasted $12.50 total. That was with the latest updates from Microsoft, the latest updates from Nero, a brand-new DVD dual-layer burner, and good-quality DL DVDs. On a computer, if you have the same input and perform the same operations, you should get the same results.
I just wanted a computer that worked. That's all I wanted - a computer that works. My sister-in-law asked me to put some music on her iPod,a dn I was amazed at the quality workmanship and ease of use of that iPod, not to mention the audio quality of the ear buds. I thought that if Apple put that much insistence on quality into an iPod, they would probably put that much more into their productioin of computers. That's why I began researching the Macintosh platform. I admit that I was leery at first, but the more I played with them, the more I realized that I had been blinded by Microsoft's FUD machine. I finally made the switch in August of this year, when I bought my 20" iMac, then followed that up in October when I bought my 15" MacBook Pro. I am so extremely pleased with my purchases, I began wondering what took me so long to wake up and see the light. I'm so happy, I'll never go back to a PC, except at work, where we have nothing but
Sorry for the long post, but I wanted put a slightly different spin on the pro-Apple, anti-Microsoft debate. Other than Windows 2000, I've had to spend too much time getting the computer ready to use. I really liked Windows 2000, however, but it's not supported any longer. One thing I noticed is the paradigm shift between Microsoft and Apple. Microsoft lets the user use their computer the way Microsoft wants, but Apple simply allows the user the freedom to use their computer. I have a feeling of freedom when using a Macintosh, something I never quite felt while using a PC.
HawaiiMacAddict