Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

codeunrwolfpack

macrumors member
Jul 10, 2009
78
151
The difference is negligible, and the Ultra 2 still has watch faces that show more information on the screen.

Overall, I have seen people claim that the Series 10 is somehow more technologically advanced than the Ultra. It’s not, the watches are effectively the same after the update to WatchOS 11. Ultra 2 has speakers, sleep apnea detection, bright screen, strong battery life, etc. The screen size is effectively the same. The Series 10 does have the better viewing angles, but that is a very small thing.
Not true, the screen is better on the Series 10. It has better viewing angles and can update once a second, which is why it can show the seconds on some watch faces when the screen is off. The Ultra 2 cannot do that. The screen cannot refresh once every second when it is not actively being looked at. Whether that is important to anyone is a whole different story, but the screen is better on the Series 10.
 

Shirasaki

macrumors P6
May 16, 2015
16,249
11,745
I resisted, because my wallet has become flat preordering iPhone 16 Pro Max. o_O
Wanted to upgrade my MacBook Pro with Touch Bar to a newer model but I’m still waiting for M4. Want to upgrade iPad Pro too but ugh…
The black watch looks cool. I might’ve thought twice if black was there when I bought my Apple Watch Ultra 2.
 

ignatius345

macrumors 604
Aug 20, 2015
7,574
12,924
Ah, yes, I remember! You are right! The old polycarbonate MacBooks were indeed more expensive in black than in white!
I sprung for the black, now that I think about it. (That machine was a real scorcher, and I used to use it with a wooden cutting board between it and my lap. Truly do not miss the Intel days...)
 
  • Love
Reactions: CaféPicasso

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,318
29,881
SoCal
There is more screen real estate on the Series 10 and I would want the Ultra 2 to have that two.

I was looking at the comparison chart and it looks like the Ultra 2 has the S9 chip and the Series has the S10. Again, I don't understand why Apple didn't upgrade the Ultra 2 to the S10 chip. Oh well....
Well, you’re not the only one. Not updating the U2 saved me $$$ this year, and my U2 will last me til next Sep, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: msackey

stygs

macrumors newbie
Jul 6, 2017
22
184
How do you find the band in terms of pinching arm hairs? I don't live close enough to an Apple Store to try it for myself!
I tried it on for this exact reason... It pinched a little bit. Not a ton? I think I would've gotten past that but I actually found the band to be a bit clunky overall. It didn't glide smoothing through the loops and working the clasp was trickier than I expected... Combined with the slight pinching I opted to stick with my Ultra 1.
 

msackey

macrumors 68030
Oct 8, 2020
2,856
3,291
Well, you’re not the only one. Not updating the U2 saved me $$$ this year, and my U2 will last me til next Sep, at least.
I plan to use my Ultra for quite a while and plan to exchange the battery when necessary. I'm thinking my Ultra should give me at least 6 years, hopefully more?
 
  • Like
Reactions: madrigal77

Rafagon

macrumors 6502a
Jun 19, 2011
863
966
Miami, FL
(Sept 9 Keynote) Me: Color only upgrade for my Apple Watch Ultra. I'll pass.

(Sept 20 Availability) Me: Absolutely no way on that color only upgrade. What a joke.

(Sept 29): Me:

View attachment 2430553


😬
Color and possible loss of blood oxygen sensor functionality, if you have it currently.

But I agree the color rocks. I was very tempted to do so myself until I decided that keeping my sensor was more important to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arran and Mikeeee

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,318
29,881
SoCal
I plan to use my Ultra for quite a while and plan to exchange the battery when necessary. I'm thinking my Ultra should give me at least 6 years, hopefully more?
just make sure you have/keep AC+ ...
I will upgrade at the point when these criteria are met:
. Blood oxygen back
. blood pressure trends
. SB
. blood glucose would be icing on the top but I think that is a few more years out
I had those criteria actually for this year and it didn't happen ...
AW for me is a tool, not a "fashion" object. And there is nothing wrong with "fashion" in my comment, it's just not me.
 

klasma

macrumors 604
Jun 8, 2017
7,405
20,658
Tim Cook be like:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mikeeee

msackey

macrumors 68030
Oct 8, 2020
2,856
3,291
just make sure you have/keep AC+ ...
I will upgrade at the point when these criteria are met:
. Blood oxygen back
. blood pressure trends
. SB
. blood glucose would be icing on the top but I think that is a few more years out
I had those criteria actually for this year and it didn't happen ...
AW for me is a tool, not a "fashion" object. And there is nothing wrong with "fashion" in my comment, it's just not me.
I’m very doubtful blood pressure monitoring will come any time soon.

Blood glucose monitoring (done by the watch without piercing the skin) won’t likely happen any time soon, not even in a few years.

Both monitoring require some kind of regulatory approval with blood glucose probably much more difficult. The current hype around glucose monitoring is Continuous Glucose Monitoring which isn’t actually blood glucose. CGM is monitoring the glucose of the interstitial fluids beneath the skin, and is an accepted proxy for blood glucose measurement. But it is a proxy.
 

xDKP

macrumors 68020
Feb 27, 2011
2,480
2,624
Denmark
Doing my VERY best not to do the same :) Guess this year will be an iPhone year and next year an Apple Watch year
 

JustinKent

macrumors member
Jan 31, 2017
93
197
Prefer the silver to black color myself, but the new titanium milanese loop is 👌🏼🔥
 

Jamie0003

macrumors 65816
Apr 17, 2009
1,307
1,176
Norfolk, UK
(Sept 9 Keynote) Me: Color only upgrade for my Apple Watch Ultra. I'll pass.

(Sept 20 Availability) Me: Absolutely no way on that color only upgrade. What a joke.

(Sept 29): Me:

View attachment 2430553


😬
How does it compare to the original Milanese? I love the original but my hairs kept getting stuck and had to constantly adjust the magnet

Still waiting for a titanium version of the link bracelet though
 

techno-Zen

macrumors 68000
Apr 27, 2015
1,879
3,260
Gilbert, AZ
Not true, the screen is better on the Series 10. It has better viewing angles and can update once a second, which is why it can show the seconds on some watch faces when the screen is off. The Ultra 2 cannot do that. The screen cannot refresh once every second when it is not actively being looked at. Whether that is important to anyone is a whole different story, but the screen is better on the Series 10.
Disagree, while there is a slight improvement in angle viewing on Series 10. The 3000 nit display on the Ultra 2 is absolutely an improvement
 

L23

macrumors newbie
Oct 1, 2014
27
26
There is more screen real estate on the Series 10 and I would want the Ultra 2 to have that two.
Screen real estate means the amount of space available on a display for an application to provide output. While technically true there is a very small difference in screen size. Currently the Ultra shows more information on the display even though the screen is a tiny bit smaller. But that is a software limitation on the Series 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMountainLife

L23

macrumors newbie
Oct 1, 2014
27
26
Disagree, while there is a slight improvement in angle viewing on Series 10. The 3000 nit display on the Ultra 2 is absolutely an improvement
I also disagree. From a Youtube video I couldn't see the difference. Maybe it is different in a real life comparison. But the viewing angle is good overall on a 3000 nit display from my Ultra 2 experience.

The screen updating every second is really cool though. But by only working on two watch faces at the moment not worthwhile. It would be different if the whole watchOS makes use of that hardware feature.
 

tolili alert

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2022
102
121
I also disagree. From a Youtube video I couldn't see the difference. Maybe it is different in a real life comparison. But the viewing angle is good overall on a 3000 nit display from my Ultra 2 experience.

The screen updating every second is really cool though. But by only working on two watch faces at the moment not worthwhile. It would be different if the whole watchOS makes use of that hardware feature.
Threes watch faces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future

Mikeeee

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 27, 2017
552
534
Color and possible loss of blood oxygen sensor functionality, if you have it currently.

But I agree the color rocks. I was very tempted to do so myself until I decided that keeping my sensor was more important to me.
I'm in Canada so that excuse is off the table here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rafagon

Mikeeee

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 27, 2017
552
534
How does it compare to the original Milanese? I love the original but my hairs kept getting stuck and had to constantly adjust the magnet

Still waiting for a titanium version of the link bracelet though
It's nicer than the original Milanese IMO. The clasp is really nice as is the band itself. Very happy with it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.