If it does have what's in the rumors leaked so far, there's nothing really stand out in specs either.
It doesn't matter. The sheep will line up to buy it regardless. All that matters is that it's the latest model.
If it does have what's in the rumors leaked so far, there's nothing really stand out in specs either.
Fixed it for you.
I had an android phone after my Iphone 3G and I had nothing but problems with it. The pros did not outweigh the cons one bit, I was so glad when I got my 4S I will never buy another android product because of that one phone, bleck.
I had an android phone after my Iphone 3G and I had nothing but problems with it. The pros did not outweigh the cons one bit, I was so glad when I got my 4S I will never buy another android product because of that one phone, bleck.
It was an HTC Inspire 4G
1) My iPhone 3G didn't feel cheap, yet the back was pure plastic.I don't like plastic it feels cheap. Lumia, iPhone, HTC phones have much better build quality.
How do you define poorly optimized? A lot of Android phones are laggy, if that's what you mean. But Samsung's latest stuff seems pretty smooth.
Yeah, updates suck. They seem worst in the U.S.
How does the build quality effect you? (I figure you're talking about materials, sturdiness, ect.) Do you not put cases on your phones? It's arguable that Samsung phones are built better than the iPhone. Kinda depends on what you're looking for.
Your thoughts on the Galaxy S III
Giuly said:2) The Lumia features an unibody polycarbonate (yes, that's plastic) design. It's the best example of how to use plastic to design a phone (and then ruin it with WP7).
If that advertisement image is supposed to be a spoiler, then the liquid metal rumour may be more attributable to Samsung than Apple
I switched from the 4 to the Lumia and lasted three days. Let me tell you, the operating system was the best part about that phone. WP7 is awesome but after using a phone of glass and steel for the past two years I couldn't settle for plastic.
Except apple own the rights to liquidmetal in consumer electronics!
So is my Samsung galaxy note.I don't know how samsung do it, but their android phones seem to operate so much more smoothly than all the others
the SGS2 is totally lag free
I think there's a difference between build quality/durability and impact resistance. There's this concept out there that the iPhone has bad build quality/durability because if you drop it it cracks. But in terms of how solid it feels and the quality of materials used, its the best out there, and its certainly very durable because the glass/metal stands up to wear and tear better than plastic. It has poor impact resistance, but phones really aren't meant to be dropped...you're talking about close to $1000 worth of cutting edge technology here, it should be taken care of. Cases/cheap phones are out there for the clumsy.
And, having a samsung focus and an iPhone, as much as I adore the focus, its because of windows phone. Not the device. The device seems cheap, the plastic makes it feel like a toy, not a tool. That's what people mean about the build quality I think. When you spend that much money on a device (GS3 will likely be $300 with contract), you want it to feel premium, and even though the GS3 will be industry leading, it won't feel like that in your hand (if they keep the plastic designs of older phones, this is all conjecture), and thats a problem
So the fact that the iPhone is made of glass and stainless steel overrides everything else
If that advertisement image is supposed to be a spoiler, then the liquid metal rumour may be more attributable to Samsung than Apple