Yeah that looks like a valuable review from a credible person. I will totally waste my time viewing that.You may want to check this (video starts at the part about wifi not being dual band)
Yeah that looks like a valuable review from a credible person. I will totally waste my time viewing that.You may want to check this (video starts at the part about wifi not being dual band)
Sure, Luke Miani is a totally random guy.... And your word, based on some specs and no actual testing, matters more than someone who has actually tested it 20 times to make sure the comparison was correct....Yeah that looks like a valuable review from a credible person. I will totally waste my time viewing that.
Responding to the part I underlined: how is the 10th gen not good for that use case? Because the A14 isn’t enough of a “top notch performer”? Yes it’s slower than the M1, but for how many iPad users is that really the limiting factor?I think there is a broad consensus that the new iPad line-up is weird and convoluted. I think the Ars Technica review summarises the 10th gen iPad perfectly - it's great device in isolation, but it's awkwardly positioned and not great value:
"if you're just looking for a [basic iPad], look no further than the $329, ninth-generation iPad; this 10th-generation model's Air-like redesign doesn't add anything essential to that, but it adds at least $129 to the price.If you're looking for a productivity and creative device for taking notes, typing on the go, and top-notch performance—in other words, the full iPad experience—you can grab the iPad Air, starting at $599...If you want all of that but in a smaller package, get the iPad mini. Or if you're a creative on the go with huge performance needs and the desire for the cutting-edge in display technology and more—and price is no object—the iPad Pro is the best one for you.It's not that the iPad is bad. It's just not the best choice for anybody in particular." (emphasis added)
I can’t speak for the author of the article, but it’s not as good for notetaking/sketching as it has the older and (much) worse Pencil (with the weird charging solution as well). I guess if you take ‘creativity’ to mean photo/video editing, then the superior display and processor of the Air might be significant too.Responding to the part I underlined: how is the 10th gen not good for that use case? Because the A14 isn’t enough of a “top notch performer”? Yes it’s slower than the M1, but for how many iPad users is that really the limiting factor?
This confirms the points I made, and OP decided to laugh at it, makes me wonder if he actually like the iPad 10. I am right, the iPad 10 is so gimped that it’s a terrible value and probably the worst iPad in the lineup. Basically, anything else would be better value than the iPad 10. Also, appalling that it only has USB 2.0 speeds and no dual band Wifi. Nobody should be buying this since Apple intentionally made it unappealing at an inflated price so people would buy the Air or Pro.You may want to check this (video starts at the part about wifi not being dual band)
Disagree with Ars Technica and the consensus — even dismay — here on Mac Rumors.
The iPad line-up makes great sense and is a classic Tim Cook move, with improved devices for “marginally” more money.
Set aside the Pros and focus on the iPad 9, 10, and Air. In each case, for a relatively “nominal” amount of extra money, you get a substantially improved device. (Typically, Cook prices devices in $100 USD increments; these are slightly more).
iPad 9 vs. 10
For $120 more in the U.S., the 10 gives you
ColorsLarger screenA14 v. A13 chipBetter cameraUSB-C5G cellularLiquid Retina Display vs. RD
iPad 10 vs. Air
For $150 more, you get
M1 chipAdvanced media engineDifferent colors2nd gen pencilChoice of two keyboardsLaminated screen with anti-reflective coatingBetter, richer, color palette for screen (wide color, P3 vs. sRGB)The line-up makes sense to me… and I'm in the market for a new iPad!
I feel no confusion over it; a different set of features at different price points.
Indeed, Cook has done it again! It's a masterful, classic Cook line-up, nudging people to step up one or two increments and spend more money with Apple!
Brilliantly mercenary, while being pro-consumer.
——————
Note: The landscape vs. portrait camera placement throws some for a loop in making the comparisons, but that is a non sequitur for many buyers. It is irrelevant, a matter of individual preference, or something one simply can get used to, rather than being a source of confusion. Others, no doubt, will disagree — and have already!
Greedy 🍎 It’s hard to justify the price especially for existing users.Agreed. At $449, the 10th gen is too expensive while wages have been flat and haven’t kept up with inflation.
This one needs to be priced more along $349-399 but I reckon that will come after the 9th gen is dropped from the lineup.
How is the Apple Pencil 1 “much worse” for notetaking and is your opinion based on firsthand experience?I can’t speak for the author of the article, but it’s not as good for notetaking/sketching as it has the older and (much) worse Pencil (with the weird charging solution as well). I guess if you take ‘creativity’ to mean photo/video editing, then the superior display and processor of the Air might be significant too.
Not huge differences for sure - it’s not much worse than the Air - especially if you don’t use the pencil, and like the colours. But it’s not much cheaper either.
John Gruber goes into more detail, but basically the Pencil 2 feels much nicer in the hand (both shape and the matte texture), and the magnetic placement solves both the problem of storing it and charging it. The storage thing is especially important for me - it sounds silly, but with the old Pencil I was always looking for it in my case or bag, sometimes the cap came off and I'd have to look for that too. Always having it right there to grab and use without using a special case to hold it makes a big difference.How is the Apple Pencil 1 “much worse” for notetaking
It is.is your opinion based on firsthand experience?
Honestly this is a much smaller deal that people think, at least for note taking. Pencil 1 makes no sense when you can get a clone of the pencil 2 that will work perfectly with the iPad since it uses the same tecnology as the Logitech crayon, charges via USB C and is much cheaper (I got one for $15 on Aliexpress but you can find the same for $30-40 on Amazon). The magnets are quite a bit weaker than the pencil 2 (but they exist, while the pencil 1 cannot be attached at all) but for this device it's a no brainer.John Gruber goes into more detail, but basically the Pencil 2 feels much nicer in the hand (both shape and the matte texture), and the magnetic placement solves both the problem of storing it and charging it. The storage thing is especially important for me - it sounds silly, but with the old Pencil I was always looking for it in my case or bag, sometimes the cap came off and I'd have to look for that too. Always having it right there to grab and use without using a special case to hold it makes a big difference.
I use the Pencil 2 primarily to mark up PDFs, and I use the double tap all the time to alternate between highlighting in colour and scribbling notes.
It is.
I used the Pencil 1 with a 2nd gen Pro quite a bit, and more briefly with a smaller iPad I got from work (a 6th gen I think). It was okay, but I found it far less pleasant to use, to the point where I mostly gave up with it, and only rekindled my enthusiasm for handwriting notes when the new version came out.
I realise things like 'feels much nicer in the hand' sounds trivial and subjective but...well, it's a writing implement. How it feels in the hand is pretty darn important.
Liquid Retina vs Retina.I wish they would put usb-c in the 9th gen. USB-C is honestly the only reason I looked at the 10th gen iPad. Not worth $120 though.
Liquid Retina just means rounded anglesLiquid Retina vs Retina.
A14 vs A13
12.9 display vs 12.2
12mp wide camera vs 8mp
Landscape camera vs portrait
USB-C vs lightning
5G vs 4G on cellular model
Magic Keyboard vs Smart Keyboard
4k video recording vs 1080
Smart HDR 3 for photo vs HDR
Pretty much the difference between the new 10th versus 9th
"Liquid Retina" means a type of LCD display with a higher pixel density. Doesn't have anything to do with rounded angles.Liquid Retina just means rounded angles
Ya really not worth it for a kid to watch Disney+. But I won’t buy anything with lightning anymore. Alas we wait.Liquid Retina vs Retina.
A14 vs A13
12.9 display vs 12.2
12mp wide camera vs 8mp
Landscape camera vs portrait
USB-C vs lightning
5G vs 4G on cellular model
Magic Keyboard vs Smart Keyboard
4k video recording vs 1080
Smart HDR 3 for photo vs HDR
Pretty much the difference between the new 10th versus 9th
Oh man... no.. that's not true at all... All iPads, excluding the minis, have the same pixel density (264ppi) since the (retina) iPad 3... Liquid retina is just a marketing name that Apple introduced when it moved to the new form factor with flat edges where the screen had rounded angles. It has nothing to do with pixel density."Liquid Retina" means a type of LCD display with a higher pixel density. Doesn't have anything to do with rounded angles.
EDIT: aka a marketing term Apple made up for pixel density on some of their devices.
not correct, same pixel density as the old 9th gen iPad"Liquid Retina" means a type of LCD display with a higher pixel density. Doesn't have anything to do with rounded angles.
EDIT: aka a marketing term Apple made up for pixel density on some of their devices.
Liquid Retina vs Retina.
A14 vs A13
12.9 display vs 12.2
12mp wide camera vs 8mp
Landscape camera vs portrait
USB-C vs lightning
5G vs 4G on cellular model
Magic Keyboard vs Smart Keyboard
4k video recording vs 1080
Smart HDR 3 for photo vs HDR
Pretty much the difference between the new 10th versus 9th
so you are comparing something that does not exist anymore since the air 2 to what's available now?I don’t understand the confusion over the pricing. The iPad used to start at $499 for 16gb, and an extra $100 for 64gb. This new model starts at $449 for 64gb, full screen with uniform bezel, TouchID power button, higher RAM, better processor, better screen — if these things don’t appeal to you, buy the 9th generation that is still available. The Pencil compatibility doesn’t bother me because I have a 12.9 M1, so the 10.9 iPad will just be used for reading and non-Pencil use cases.