The crazy thing is that we're almost at the end of Q1 and no sign of Broadwell-EP as per the roadmap.
Trouble?!
That's a good point, as that was indeed only a spec bump.
But at least Apple could have thrown a "spec bump" bone bone to anyone who had to buy right now or even last year. It's easy to do and would have provided a better value today.
probably delayed.OK, almost still a month away but still, no word on launch schedule is weird.
The crazy thing is that we're almost at the end of Q1 and no sign of Broadwell-EP as per the roadmap.
Trouble?!
Right, the problem is that unlike those Westmeres, we haven't had much of a spec bump from intel to use.
Well, they could have put Haswell-EP and the C612 chipset in there
True, but that would actually take some work. More than just putting a new chip on the same socket, anyway, and too much for Apple apparently....
While it does have an impact it isn't really a factor that will make or break your decision when it comes to buying said car. The overall performance is. You missed the forest for the trees...
Just hope that the update interval isn't ∞ ....That's a good point, as that was indeed only a spec bump.
But at least Apple could have thrown a "spec bump" bone bone to anyone who had to buy right now or even last year. It's easy to do and would have provided a better value today.
Now you can't even see the trees for the leaves.Dude, some people buy a special edition of a car just cause of badges and a bit of trim, or a body kit, no performance at all.
I suppose you consider say a 3 series coupe BMW to be the same as a M3 coupe, who looks at those minor differences in the same make and series eh.....and the exhaust in slightly bigger.....
As I pointed out, stick to computers guys and stop using car analogies, frankly you know a lot more about computers.
His car analogy was incorrect cause even NA cars benefit from a larger exhaust, so him saying you needed to go to a turbo to get any performance was incorrect, I could care less about the comparison to the AMD, from a motoring point of view it was incorrect.
Its not like the said individual does not spend their time also correcting people when it comes to computers And I have to admit I actually admire his knowledge and respect his opinion, he knows his stuff Just not cars, but hey I spend 10 years working for a motoring magazine....
Of course you did...Dude, some people buy a special edition of a car just cause of badges and a bit of trim, or a body kit, no performance at all.
I suppose you consider say a 3 series coupe BMW to be the same as a M3 coupe, who looks at those minor differences in the same make and series eh.....and the exhaust in slightly bigger.....
As I pointed out, stick to computers guys and stop using car analogies, frankly you know a lot more about computers.
His car analogy was incorrect cause even NA cars benefit from a larger exhaust, so him saying you needed to go to a turbo to get any performance was incorrect, I could care less about the comparison to the AMD, from a motoring point of view it was incorrect.
Its not like the said individual does not spend their time also correcting people when it comes to computers And I have to admit I actually admire his knowledge and respect his opinion, he knows his stuff Just not cars, but hey I spend 10 years working for a motoring magazine....
Just hope that the update interval isn't ∞ ....
[doublepost=1456971705][/doublepost]
Now you can't even see the trees for the leaves.
Of course you did...
You analogy was incorrect . Simple
Yes, I know what you meant, and yeah you supported your point, but in achieving that you used an example from a motoring perspective that was wrong. From a perspective buyers point.
Like I said, I respect your IT knowledge on this site, always have.
Anyway , this is off topic, feel free to have another leaves post, I'll ignore next one.
[doublepost=1456987259][/doublepost]
I worked on the website supporting the magazine.
The anology is wrong on so many levels, from a motoring point of view.
I'd suggest learning about NA and turbo to begin with classic mistake is that turbo = better performance....tsk tsk. FOR many turbo is like Mac v PC , now do you understand the picture YOU are missing with his anology.
Meh....Stick to computers lads!!!
I resisted posting the Nvidia PR about their 150 PetaFlop system...Oh some new propaganda, err, I mean press releases from AMD...
Dick waving fest like always from Nvidia fanboys. None of you two seen the real deal with that news, did you?
CUDA is working on AMD GPUs(Boltzmann Initiative). That was the point of that info. Good day.
Erm, What I was saying is: in OpenCL AMD GPUs are better than Nvidia cards are. All you want to do here is to pun, nothing else.That must leave a terrible taste in your mout then Koyoot... After years of saying that CUDA was irrelevant and posting blurb after blurb about how great OpenCL is/was...
Erm, What I was saying is: in OpenCL AMD GPUs are better than Nvidia cards are. All you want to do here is to pun, nothing else.
I even said, that with Metal Apple makes them door to put CUDA to OS X IF AMD goes bust. Now they are having even better possibility to just putting CUDA compiler into Metal and run it off on AMD GPUs.
Time will tell if it will have better effect. But that would not surprise me at all.