Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

wallysb01

macrumors 68000
Jun 30, 2011
1,589
809
The crazy thing is that we're almost at the end of Q1 and no sign of Broadwell-EP as per the roadmap.
Trouble?!

I wonder this too? Every couple of days I do a broadwell-EP google search just to make sure I haven't somehow missed some important news. Its seems oddly quiet after leaked specs, prices and the manufactures' sample benchmarks.

That's a good point, as that was indeed only a spec bump.

But at least Apple could have thrown a "spec bump" bone bone to anyone who had to buy right now or even last year. It's easy to do and would have provided a better value today.

Right, the problem is that unlike those Westmeres, we haven't had much of a spec bump from intel to use. The only reasonable thing Apple could do is just drop the price. But that's so un-Apple.
 

jonisign

macrumors regular
Jul 7, 2007
153
16
The crazy thing is that we're almost at the end of Q1 and no sign of Broadwell-EP as per the roadmap.
Trouble?!

I think the predictions now are Q2–– if these chips are released before WWDC and there is no update from Apple then we might be in trouble–– otherwise they could definitely do a fall or winter release like they did for the late 2013 mac pro.
[doublepost=1456955285][/doublepost]
Right, the problem is that unlike those Westmeres, we haven't had much of a spec bump from intel to use.

Well, they could have put Haswell-EP and the C612 chipset in there o_O
 

jonisign

macrumors regular
Jul 7, 2007
153
16
True, but that would actually take some work. More than just putting a new chip on the same socket, anyway, and too much for Apple apparently....

I know, I know ;)

What I'm surprised about is why Apple doesn't design around new chipsets when they come out rather than wait for the second iteration of CPUs for a given chipset. If they just designed around sandy bridge-ep or haswell-ep then they could easily just do drop in CPU upgrades every ~1.5 years rather than going 3+ years without an update or price drop.
 

MH01

Suspended
Feb 11, 2008
12,107
9,297
While it does have an impact it isn't really a factor that will make or break your decision when it comes to buying said car. The overall performance is. You missed the forest for the trees...

Dude, some people buy a special edition of a car just cause of badges and a bit of trim, or a body kit, no performance at all.

I suppose you consider say a 3 series coupe BMW to be the same as a M3 coupe, who looks at those minor differences in the same make and series eh.....and the exhaust in slightly bigger.....

As I pointed out, stick to computers guys and stop using car analogies, frankly you know a lot more about computers.

His car analogy was incorrect cause even NA cars benefit from a larger exhaust, so him saying you needed to go to a turbo to get any performance was incorrect, I could care less about the comparison to the AMD, from a motoring point of view it was incorrect.

Its not like the said individual does not spend their time also correcting people when it comes to computers ;) And I have to admit I actually admire his knowledge and respect his opinion, he knows his stuff ;) Just not cars, but hey I spend 10 years working for a motoring magazine....
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
That's a good point, as that was indeed only a spec bump.

But at least Apple could have thrown a "spec bump" bone bone to anyone who had to buy right now or even last year. It's easy to do and would have provided a better value today.
Just hope that the update interval isn't ∞ ....
[doublepost=1456971705][/doublepost]
Dude, some people buy a special edition of a car just cause of badges and a bit of trim, or a body kit, no performance at all.

I suppose you consider say a 3 series coupe BMW to be the same as a M3 coupe, who looks at those minor differences in the same make and series eh.....and the exhaust in slightly bigger.....

As I pointed out, stick to computers guys and stop using car analogies, frankly you know a lot more about computers.

His car analogy was incorrect cause even NA cars benefit from a larger exhaust, so him saying you needed to go to a turbo to get any performance was incorrect, I could care less about the comparison to the AMD, from a motoring point of view it was incorrect.

Its not like the said individual does not spend their time also correcting people when it comes to computers ;) And I have to admit I actually admire his knowledge and respect his opinion, he knows his stuff ;) Just not cars, but hey I spend 10 years working for a motoring magazine....
Now you can't even see the trees for the leaves.
 

tuxon86

macrumors 65816
May 22, 2012
1,321
477
Dude, some people buy a special edition of a car just cause of badges and a bit of trim, or a body kit, no performance at all.

I suppose you consider say a 3 series coupe BMW to be the same as a M3 coupe, who looks at those minor differences in the same make and series eh.....and the exhaust in slightly bigger.....

As I pointed out, stick to computers guys and stop using car analogies, frankly you know a lot more about computers.

His car analogy was incorrect cause even NA cars benefit from a larger exhaust, so him saying you needed to go to a turbo to get any performance was incorrect, I could care less about the comparison to the AMD, from a motoring point of view it was incorrect.

Its not like the said individual does not spend their time also correcting people when it comes to computers ;) And I have to admit I actually admire his knowledge and respect his opinion, he knows his stuff ;) Just not cars, but hey I spend 10 years working for a motoring magazine....
Of course you did...
 

MH01

Suspended
Feb 11, 2008
12,107
9,297
Just hope that the update interval isn't ∞ ....
[doublepost=1456971705][/doublepost]
Now you can't even see the trees for the leaves.

You analogy was incorrect . Simple

Yes, I know what you meant, and yeah you supported your point, but in achieving that you used an example from a motoring perspective that was wrong. From a perspective buyers point.

Like I said, I respect your IT knowledge on this site, always have.

Anyway , this is off topic, feel free to have another leaves post, I'll ignore next one.

[doublepost=1456987259][/doublepost]
Of course you did...

I worked on the website supporting the magazine.

The anology is wrong on so many levels, from a motoring point of view.

I'd suggest learning about NA and turbo to begin with ;) classic mistake is that turbo = better performance....tsk tsk. FOR many turbo is like Mac v PC , now do you understand the picture YOU are missing with his anology.

Meh....Stick to computers lads!!!
 
Last edited:

ManuelGomes

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Dec 4, 2014
1,617
354
Aveiro, Portugal
It's not clear if DP1.3 devices can be "upgraded" to DP1.4 since there is no bandwidth improvement, it seems added compression was the main focus. This might allow devices, with a firmware update, to compress data as long as the display will also be able to decompress. But that seems a remote possibility though.
I wonder if 5K@60Hz HDR will be supported, with compression probably only.
[doublepost=1457001717][/doublepost]OK, HDR with compression:

http://anandtech.com/show/10110/ves...-14-standard-displayport-adds-compression-hdr
 

tuxon86

macrumors 65816
May 22, 2012
1,321
477
You analogy was incorrect . Simple

Yes, I know what you meant, and yeah you supported your point, but in achieving that you used an example from a motoring perspective that was wrong. From a perspective buyers point.

Like I said, I respect your IT knowledge on this site, always have.

Anyway , this is off topic, feel free to have another leaves post, I'll ignore next one.

[doublepost=1456987259][/doublepost]

I worked on the website supporting the magazine.

The anology is wrong on so many levels, from a motoring point of view.

I'd suggest learning about NA and turbo to begin with ;) classic mistake is that turbo = better performance....tsk tsk. FOR many turbo is like Mac v PC , now do you understand the picture YOU are missing with his anology.

Meh....Stick to computers lads!!!

So you didn't work for the magazine... Check.
 

koyoot

macrumors 603
Jun 5, 2012
5,939
1,853
Dick waving fest like always from Nvidia fanboys. None of you two seen the real deal with that news, did you?

CUDA is working on AMD GPUs(Boltzmann Initiative). That was the point of that info. Good day.
 

tuxon86

macrumors 65816
May 22, 2012
1,321
477
Dick waving fest like always from Nvidia fanboys. None of you two seen the real deal with that news, did you?

CUDA is working on AMD GPUs(Boltzmann Initiative). That was the point of that info. Good day.

That must leave a terrible taste in your mout then Koyoot... After years of saying that CUDA was irrelevant and posting blurb after blurb about how great OpenCL is/was...
 

koyoot

macrumors 603
Jun 5, 2012
5,939
1,853
That must leave a terrible taste in your mout then Koyoot... After years of saying that CUDA was irrelevant and posting blurb after blurb about how great OpenCL is/was...
Erm, What I was saying is: in OpenCL AMD GPUs are better than Nvidia cards are. All you want to do here is to pun, nothing else.
I even said, that with Metal Apple makes them door to put CUDA to OS X IF AMD goes bust. Now they are having even better possibility to just putting CUDA compiler into Metal and run it off on AMD GPUs.

Time will tell if it will have better effect. But that would not surprise me at all.
 

tuxon86

macrumors 65816
May 22, 2012
1,321
477
Erm, What I was saying is: in OpenCL AMD GPUs are better than Nvidia cards are. All you want to do here is to pun, nothing else.
I even said, that with Metal Apple makes them door to put CUDA to OS X IF AMD goes bust. Now they are having even better possibility to just putting CUDA compiler into Metal and run it off on AMD GPUs.

Time will tell if it will have better effect. But that would not surprise me at all.

Quite a word salad you posted there...
You've been advocating for months that OpenCL was the best and greatest and that Cuda was a waste of time, just to realise that even Apple doesn't put that much faith in it as it is being phased out in favor of Metal and now you are posting about running Cuda on AMDs, someone is really confused here...
 

ManuelGomes

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Dec 4, 2014
1,617
354
Aveiro, Portugal
Not much info on Polaris in AMD's AMA. Only DP1.3 confirmed.
[doublepost=1457033241][/doublepost]Kaby Lake being pushed to year end, coinciding with Zen. Deliberate or just another delay?
[doublepost=1457033498][/doublepost]KL Z270 chipset increases PCIe 3 lane count to 24.
[doublepost=1457033742][/doublepost]Honestly, I don't see the nMP coming any time soon anymore.
Polaris in the summer? Let's see if it will only be a paper launch.
BDW-EP seems to MIA too.
Maybe Apple is waiting on Skylake and Optane? By then, Polaris is out for sure and it will be a heck of a machine. But that would be another year...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.