Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

pat500000

Suspended
Jun 3, 2015
8,523
7,515
You know what is scary at this point? I was looking at computers in my country, and was looking for workstations. Normal, Xeon based, Nvidia equipped workstations. Xeon E5 8 core 1680v3, 800 GB Intel SSD + 8 TB of HDD, 64 GB of RAM, GTX 980 TI. It is 4000 PLN(around 1000$) less expensive than Mac Pro with... 6 core Xeon, 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB SSD, and dual D500.

Apple, shame on you.
It is shame on Apple. But then ya "OS X " lol
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
You know what is scary at this point? I was looking at computers in my country, and was looking for workstations. Normal, Xeon based, Nvidia equipped workstations. Xeon E5 8 core 1680v3, 800 GB Intel SSD + 8 TB of HDD, 64 GB of RAM, GTX 980 TI. It is 4000 PLN(around 1000$) less expensive than Mac Pro with... 6 core Xeon, 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB SSD, and dual D500.

Apple, shame on you.
Apple's Mac Pro value proposition is falling on very hard times.

Apple has typically had well equipped systems at a hefty price. At first glance, they seemed expensive compared to others - but often if you optioned out other systems to the level of the Apple they were comparable (and sometimes the Apple would be a bit cheaper).

(This of course ignores the situation of people for whom the base "other" system was fine, and the Apple was expensive overkill.)

These days, the Mac Pro is so out-of-date that comparisons are difficult (the entry Dell workstation has a Xeon v5 CPU, the entry MP6,1 has an old Xeon v2 CPU). I couldn't even find a Xeon v2 in Dell's workstation offerings - they're all v3s and v4s above the entry level E3 systems. In a few weeks, we may see Pascal graphics cards in other workstations - and not even a rumour that the ancient Radeons in the MP6,1 are being updated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morriss

zephonic

macrumors 65816
Feb 7, 2011
1,314
709
greater L.A. area
These days, the Mac Pro is so out-of-date that comparisons are difficult (the entry Dell workstation has a Xeon v5 CPU, the entry MP6,1 has an old Xeon v2 CPU).

v5? Are you sure? AFAIK, Xeon v5 not even out yet, or are you talking about E3-v5? E5-v4 has just been released, I think. E5-v5 coming in 2017.
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
v5? Are you sure? AFAIK, Xeon v5 not even out yet, or are you talking about E3-v5? E5-v4 has just been released, I think. E5-v5 coming in 2017.
Absolutely the base is a v5. And yes it's an E3.

This hits right at the heart of "(This of course ignores the situation of people for whom the base "other" system was fine, and the Apple was expensive overkill.)".

A Dell 3620 with 3.5 GHz quad v5 with HT, 16 GiB ECC, 2 GiB Quadro and 256 GB NVMe SSD is less than $1500. Add up to 4 more internal hard drives and an internal optical.

Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need. (And don't conveniently ignore the price for all of the external drives and cabinets that you need to add.)
 

linuxcooldude

macrumors 68020
Mar 1, 2010
2,480
7,232
Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need. (And don't conveniently ignore the price for all of the external drives and cabinets that you need to add.)

So are we going to ignore those people who use network storage or already have external drives coming from an iMac or MacBook Pro? Remember, quote the price on what we need.

Do we really need anymore strawman arguments?
 
Last edited:

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
So are we going to ignore those people who use network storage

Not at all. Add a 10GbE card to the Dell for $350. A quick search for T-Bolt->10GbE found one for $1200 (https://www.attotech.com/products/t...hunderlink/thunderbolt-to-10gbe/TLNS-2101-D00) - which is patently absurd. Please find one that doesn't cost more than the base price of the Dell. (I pay about $350 for dual-port server adaptors that support 10GbE, 8Gbps FC, 10 Gbps FCOE and iSCSI with full offloading engines for all four protocols. I can't believe that the "T-Bolt tax" is that high.)

If you're content with last generation GbE technology - the systems are identical for NAS.

(Note - I didn't check to see if the Dell 3620 has a spare slot that supports a 10 GbE card. I don't think that's relevant, however - since I'm saying "quote the price on what you need". If 10GbE is necessary, then make sure that you pick a base models that can support it and add the price of the adaptors.)

or already have external drives coming from an iMac or MacBook Pro? Remember, quote the price on what we need.

Good point - unless you still need those drives on your other Apple.

Do we really need anymore strawman arguments?

No, so please don't propose them.

If you plan on repurposing existing equipment to the workstation, then by all measures that's part of "the price for what you need".

If you have a big investment in T-Bolt peripherals that you'll move to the workstation - then for you the $3000 Apple might be more cost effective than the $1500 Dell.

If it's new storage, the four spare hard drive slots in the Dell might be more cost effective than a bunch of new external storage on a Mac Pro.
 
Last edited:

koyoot

macrumors 603
Jun 5, 2012
5,939
1,853
Absolutely the base is a v5. And yes it's an E3.

This hits right at the heart of "(This of course ignores the situation of people for whom the base "other" system was fine, and the Apple was expensive overkill.)".

A Dell 3620 with 3.5 GHz quad v5 with HT, 16 GiB ECC, 2 GiB Quadro and 256 GB NVMe SSD is less than $1500. Add up to 4 more internal hard drives and an internal optical.

Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need. (And don't conveniently ignore the price for all of the external drives and cabinets that you need to add.)


I have just built SFF PC with Xeon E3v5, 16 GB of RAM DDR4, 480 GB SSD, water cooling, Fury Nano, Mobo, PSU, and a copy of Win10 license for around 1300$(5.4K PLN).

Comparable Mac Pro is 4400$. Absolute madness.

And this gives me a thought, that If Apple wants to price next MP accordingly, and be competitive on price, they have to put 6 core Xeon as a base model, with 512 GB SSD, and 16 GB of RAM, for 2999$. Everything then would depend on GPU configs. But putting into base model something weaker than D700 would be... questionable, at least.
 
Last edited:

Hank Carter

macrumors 6502
Oct 1, 2015
338
744
So are we going to ignore those people who use network storage or already have external drives coming from an iMac or MacBook Pro? Remember, quote the price on what we need.

Do we really need anymore strawman arguments?


This is starting to sounds a lot like "My Apple right or wrong!". You can get network and Thunderbolt cards for PC boxes and they are fairly cheap. On the Dell the TB option is around $115.
 

zephonic

macrumors 65816
Feb 7, 2011
1,314
709
greater L.A. area
Absolutely the base is a v5. And yes it's an E3.

This hits right at the heart of "(This of course ignores the situation of people for whom the base "other" system was fine, and the Apple was expensive overkill.)".

A Dell 3620 with 3.5 GHz quad v5 with HT, 16 GiB ECC, 2 GiB Quadro and 256 GB NVMe SSD is less than $1500. Add up to 4 more internal hard drives and an internal optical.

Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need. (And don't conveniently ignore the price for all of the external drives and cabinets that you need to add.)

I understand your point. But comparing E3v5 to E5v2? If that's a valid comparo, why not compare it to an iMac?
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
I understand your point. But comparing E3v5 to E5v2? If that's a valid comparo, why not compare it to an iMac?
No, you really don't understand my point.

"Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need."

And you have a point about the CPU comparison, it's not fair to the slower v2.
 

Stacc

macrumors 6502a
Jun 22, 2005
888
353
Not at all. Add a 10GbE card to the Dell for $350. A quick search for T-Bolt->10GbE found one for $1200 (https://www.attotech.com/products/t...hunderlink/thunderbolt-to-10gbe/TLNS-2101-D00) - which is patently absurd. Please find one that doesn't cost more than the base price of the Dell. (I pay about $350 for dual-port server adaptors that support 10GbE, 8Gbps FC, 10 Gbps FCOE and iSCSI with full offloading engines for all four protocols. I can't believe that the "T-Bolt tax" is that high.)

If you're content with last generation GbE technology - the systems are identical for NAS.

(Note - I didn't check to see if the Dell 3620 has a spare slot that supports a 10 GbE card. I don't think that's relevant, however - since I'm saying "quote the price on what you need". If 10GbE is necessary, then make sure that you pick a base models that can support it and add the price of the adaptors.)

You might want to look a bit harder next time.

I have just built SFF PC with Xeon E3v5, 16 GB of RAM DDR4, 480 GB SSD, water cooling, Fury Nano, Mobo, PSU, and a copy of Win10 license for around 1300$(5.4K PLN).

Comparable Mac Pro is 4400$. Absolute madness.

And this gives me a thought, that If Apple wants to price next MP accordingly, and be competitive on price, they have to put 6 core Xeon as a base model, with 512 GB SSD, and 16 GB of RAM, for 2999$. Everything then would depend on GPU configs. But putting into base model something weaker than D700 would be... questionable, at least.

Sure, but you built a gaming computer not a workstation. Its not fair to compare a home built PC to a mac pro. If you depend on your computer to get your job done what do you do when it breaks? You can't just take it to Apple or Dell to get it fixed in a timely manner.

I just configured a dell workstation to relatively similar specs to the entry level mac pro and it came out to around $2500, sure its been updated to Xeon v3 but I would wager the performance and experience would be very similar. Not to mention there are many discounts to be found if you want a new mac pro as long as you don't buy it straight from the Apple store.

When Apple eventually releases a new one, I am not sure they have to do anything. Why would Apple charge less than a competing Dell workstation when clearly the Apple ecosystem has a significant value. If it didn't, we all wouldn't be here whining about Apple's design choices or lack of updates, we would have moved on to other, cheaper platforms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: linuxcooldude

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
Thanks. $400 and it's an end-device (no pass-through). $1000 seems typical for devices with two T-Bolt ports for pass-through.

It also looks like $180 is the going price for entry 10 GbE PCIe cards. $350 gets a server-grade card with more offloading and multiple protocols (Ethernet, iSCSI, FCoE).

Sure, but you built a gaming computer not a workstation. Its not fair to compare a home built PC to a mac pro. If you depend on your computer to get your job done what do you do when it breaks? You can't just take it to Apple or Dell to get it fixed in a timely manner.
Dell comes to you, for three years.

I just configured a dell workstation to relatively similar specs to the entry level mac pro and it came out to around $2500....
Fine, if you need specs similar to the Mac Pro. If you don't, you can save even more money.
 

Synchro3

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2014
1,987
850
These days, the Mac Pro is so out-of-date that comparisons are difficult (the entry Dell workstation has a Xeon v5 CPU, the entry MP6,1 has an old Xeon v2 CPU). I couldn't even find a Xeon v2 in Dell's workstation offerings - they're all v3s and v4s above the entry level E3 systems. In a few weeks, we may see Pascal graphics cards in other workstations - and not even a rumour that the ancient Radeons in the MP6,1 are being updated.

Wow, Dell 3620 Workstation with
- Xeon E3-1270 v5 (46% faster single core speed than Xeon W3690, only 5% slower than i7 6700K)
- 512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD
- only 4 GB RAM (cheaper buying it yourself, same as with Apple)
- NVIDIA Quadro K420 2GB (Kepler, as a placeholder for a self bought card)

$1'600 http://configure.us.dell.com/dellst...3x20-series-workstation&c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04

Damn! Very attractive. Only lacks of the Thunderbolt Add in card (the board is Thunderbolt capable), could not find the card separately in the shop. And no OS X of course.

I wish Apple would offer something like this...
 

Mr. Buzzcut

macrumors 65816
Jul 25, 2011
1,037
488
Ohio
May have just seen a spy photo. And of course in rose gold. What else?

cw2035-dualrosegold_productpage-photos.jpg

Hope a little humor is okay while we wait. Cheers!
 

zephonic

macrumors 65816
Feb 7, 2011
1,314
709
greater L.A. area
No, you really don't understand my point.

"Quote the price for what you need - not the price for the Apple that comes somewhat close to what you need."

Fine, if you need specs similar to the Mac Pro. If you don't, you can save even more money.

Wow, Dell 3620 Workstation with
- Xeon E3-1270 v5 (46% faster single core speed than Xeon W3690, only 5% slower than i7 6700K)

........................

I wish Apple would offer something like this...


You guys are talking xMac again. Wrong thread :D
 

linuxcooldude

macrumors 68020
Mar 1, 2010
2,480
7,232
I have just built SFF PC with Xeon E3v5, 16 GB of RAM DDR4, 480 GB SSD, water cooling, Fury Nano, Mobo, PSU, and a copy of Win10 license for around 1300$(5.4K PLN).

Comparable Mac Pro is 4400$. Absolute madness.

And this gives me a thought, that If Apple wants to price next MP accordingly, and be competitive on price, they have to put 6 core Xeon as a base model, with 512 GB SSD, and 16 GB of RAM, for 2999$. Everything then would depend on GPU configs. But putting into base model something weaker than D700 would be... questionable, at least.

As Stacc mentioned and I didn't think about, BYO computers are almost always cheaper to build than OEM brands. BYO you have no overhead like retail manufacturers and you provide your own labor ( and support ) saving a lot of money. Also comparing home PC's & Workstation parts are also in a much different price bracket.
 

wallysb01

macrumors 68000
Jun 30, 2011
1,589
809
You guys are talking xMac again. Wrong thread :D

This isn't about the xMac. This is still about E-class processors supporting ECC memory and being able to plug in some beastly graphics cards. This could be the Mac Pro and it was the Mac Pro. But now that Apple is still on E5 v2 and doesn't offer a dual CPU option, it makes a lot of people wonder WTF they are doing when you can get single socket xeon v5s as E3s. Or put more simply, the entry level Mac Pro, or any low end single socket e5 workstation, competes with the E3s. Its less PCIe lanes, but if your in the low end market because you're needs aren't terribly huge anyway....
 

Zarniwoop

macrumors 65816
Aug 12, 2009
1,038
760
West coast, Finland
If macOS name is coming, Mac line might get new old names too. Why not return the Power Mac.. The Pro -term is just plain stupid. Pro as productivity, maybe. But I find Macbook to be very productive writing tool. And professional too. So, yes, Pro = stupid name. But what makes it different from Macbook Pro, is the computational power. (ok, and a great set of connector ports).

And maybe Power Mac name could oblige Apple to make it (and keep it, with regular updates) powerful.

My dream team

Macbook
- 12" and 14" ultralight laptops
Power Macbook
- 14" and 16", heavier power machines, dGPU for both models
Power Mac
- an excuse to get rid of the Tube?
- or, curent tube could be Power Mac SE.. but it should be a cheaper model

What about the rest of the line? iMac and Mac Mini?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: H2SO4

Mago

macrumors 68030
Aug 16, 2011
2,789
912
Beyond the Thunderdome
Not at all. Add a 10GbE card to the Dell for $350. A quick search for T-Bolt->10GbE found one for $1200 (https://www.attotech.com/products/t...hunderlink/thunderbolt-to-10gbe/TLNS-2101-D00) - which is patently absurd. Please find one that doesn't cost more than the base price of the Dell. (I pay about $350 for dual-port server adaptors that support 10GbE, 8Gbps FC, 10 Gbps FCOE and iSCSI with full offloading engines for all four protocols. I can't believe that the "T-Bolt tax" is that high.)

If you're content with last generation GbE technology - the systems are identical for NAS.

(Note - I didn't check to see if the Dell 3620 has a spare slot that supports a 10 GbE card. I don't think that's relevant, however - since I'm saying "quote the price on what you need". If 10GbE is necessary, then make sure that you pick a base models that can support it and add the price of the adaptors.)



Good point - unless you still need those drives on your other Apple.



No, so please don't propose them.

If you plan on repurposing existing equipment to the workstation, then by all measures that's part of "the price for what you need".

If you have a big investment in T-Bolt peripherals that you'll move to the workstation - then for you the $3000 Apple might be more cost effective than the $1500 Dell.

If it's new storage, the four spare hard drive slots in the Dell might be more cost effective than a bunch of new external storage on a Mac Pro.
Akiito sells a tb2->10GbE for bit less than 400$, there are other adapters with dual sfp for about 700$.

This should go down quickly as tb3 ports includes 10GbE mac atl-mode which means you can network two tb3 systems by TB3 or but (when available) a tb3(10GbE mac) media adapter (something like a sfp on usb-c).

Further qnap just launched affordable 10GbE enabled NAS for 1100 you can have a 8 Bay nas (empty) capable to deliver more than 8gbps sustained data.

Synology also has some 10GbE enabled products on pipeline.
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
http://www.hwbattle.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=18732

Nvidia ceases deliveries of Maxwell GM204 and GM200 GPUs.

GTX 980 Ti(GM200) is replaced with GP104 GPU.
Here's one that might be more useful for many of us:

http://www.eteknix.com/nvidia-reportedly-stopped-maxwell-gm204-and-gm200-production/

Winding down production of a soon to be discontinued product is industry standard practice. When you see production of current models cease, that’s when you know the next generation is just around to corner. Two weeks ago, we brought you news that Nvidia may have stopped GTX 980Ti production. Now it seems that Nvidia has also ceased production of 2 other Maxwell-based GPUs in preparation of Pascal.

According to HWBattle, both of the GM204 based GPUs are no longer being supplied to AiB partners. This means the GTX 970 and 980 will disappear off store shelves sometime between the next 2 months given a normal logistics situation. At the same time, this means the replacements for GM200 and GM204 are well on their way and may arrive within 2 months as well. This is perfect for the late May launch at Computex.

As we’ve reported before, the replacements will be the 3 GP104 chips that will be called GTX 1080, 1070 and 1060Ti. These are the GP104-400, GP104-200 and GP104-150 respectively. Furthermore, the usual practice of launching reference cards first followed by custom ones will not be followed by the GTX 1070. Instead, the custom cards will launch at the same time as the reference models. With Computex just around the corner, we’ll all find out soon what GeForce Pascal truly is like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.