Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Coyote2006

macrumors 6502a
Apr 16, 2006
512
233
Can't be true. I went to the Apple store today and asked them about this issue and they said they have tested the 16" with their external monitor and everything is fine, "no problem, we never heard anything about any troubles ... do you want to buy one"? ... ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6 and simonmet

dingobiatch

macrumors regular
Jan 29, 2009
224
48
I don't see the refresh rate issue, however my Radeon uses ~5w if I'm at 1080p on my HP 27" screen, but uses ~20w if I'm at 2560x1440.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daverru

x3sphere

macrumors member
Apr 17, 2014
72
46
I don't see the refresh rate issue, however my Radeon uses ~5w if I'm at 1080p on my HP 27" screen, but uses ~20w if I'm at 2560x1440.
Try running in clamshell mode. I'm only getting 5-6W usage with my 3440x1440@120Hz monitor.

However, if I have both the built-in and external display on, it shoots up to 20W even at idle.
 

x3sphere

macrumors member
Apr 17, 2014
72
46
Weird. I posted this in another thread, but here's my output from iStats with my 3440x1440 monitor connected while in clamshell mode. As you can see, only ~6W usage. This is on the i9/32GB/5500M 4GB model.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-12-18 at 10.42.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-12-18 at 10.42.34 PM.png
    294.4 KB · Views: 195
  • Like
Reactions: Daverru

dingobiatch

macrumors regular
Jan 29, 2009
224
48
Weird. I am in clamshell mode.

It is an older monitor.. I'm actually getting a widescreen w your resolution soon, so I'm hoping it's a weird bug?
 

Idec50

macrumors regular
Feb 22, 2019
108
50
TX
Well on first pass, this looks unacceptable.

I have a 2017 15" model and a 2019 16" model. For both, I connected to a 3440x1440 60hz monitor through a Caldigit TS3Plus dock with a Display Port cable.

I turned on apple music, activity monitor, finder, messages, and loaded gmail and a google search onto safari. The older machine has many more applications running in the background and I have kept the new machine running over night a few times to catch up on indexing. After loading the apps I waited a couple minutes and then clicked them a little before capturing screen-shots. I watched both machines and attempted to grab representative screen-shots. I'm not using clamshell mode for either.

Here's the 15" (2.8ghz, 4 cores, radeon pro 555 2gb):

1576870258972.png


Here's the 16" (2.4ghz, 8 cores, radeon pro 5500m 8gb):

1576870236565.png


So with barely anything running, the new machine runs much hotter. The DC In is much higher. The fans are practically off in both scenarios. I usually override the fans to let them run much more often but I went back to system control for this test.

As well, I'm seeing the new machine spike to 200 degrees when loading more intensive applications and I have gotten the machine to where I can't cool it below 180 degrees with fans at full blast after running some more intensive applications. I can try to do a more intensive comparison later. Let me know if you have any tips that I can apply to make this comparison more equal.

Meanwhile has anyone tried the model with 2.6ghz, 6 core, 5300M 4gb?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Daverru

Mr. Incandenza

macrumors newbie
Jun 23, 2013
29
34
Just got my 16" yesterday and this is unlivable. Also it keeps crashing on reboot, fresh installation. Boot is fast but login seems to take forever for some reason.

If I connect a 4k LG display the fans go up to max speed and the left and right fin stacks hit 150 degrees. Wild.

Thinking about returning it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet

codemania

macrumors newbie
Dec 20, 2019
19
9
I just don't understand why Apple doesn't allow the iGPU to take over the external monitor even when dGPU is banned. iGPU is just powerful enough to handle such niche jobs, isn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daverru

bsbeamer

macrumors 601
Sep 19, 2012
4,313
2,713
Automatic graphics switching has been an issue on macOS since the 2012/2013 MBP’s with NVIDIA 6XX/7XX series. What pro users want/need is basically a PCIe slot control management software style app/interface to direct and/or override the OS and say “use this GPU right now for this”. I seriously doubt we will EVER see that from Apple.
 

simonmet

Cancelled
Sep 9, 2012
2,666
3,664
Sydney
I have to agree unfortunately. Apple still doesn’t have a proper heat sink

So true. Yet infuriatingly most of the reviewers (you know who they are) just blindly parrot Apple’s language and figure of “28% larger” or whatever it is as though that makes it a “new thermal solution” when tear-downs reveal that clearly isn’t the case. It’s just slightly improved/tweaked at best!

A 28% larger tiny heat sink is still a tiny heatsick. It needed to be 100-200% larger! Or more: a laptop this expensive should have some fancy vapour cooling chambers or something!
 
Last edited:

snc

macrumors regular
Jan 29, 2016
249
80
It doesn't look like cooling problem rather drivers for new radeon navi cards are mess in current state
 
  • Like
Reactions: x3sphere

x3sphere

macrumors member
Apr 17, 2014
72
46
It doesn't look like cooling problem rather drivers for new radeon navi cards are mess in current state
I would agree. It doesn’t make sense that the GPU is consuming only around 6-7W on some setups and 20W on others, even with a lower res monitor connected.

Hopefully they get it sorted. I’m happy with the performance in clamshell mode, but if I leave the lid open the GPU shoots up to 20W even at idle, which massively increases the heat output.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daverru

codemania

macrumors newbie
Dec 20, 2019
19
9
Automatic graphics switching has been an issue on macOS since the 2012/2013 MBP’s with NVIDIA 6XX/7XX series. What pro users want/need is basically a PCIe slot control management software style app/interface to direct and/or override the OS and say “use this GPU right now for this”. I seriously doubt we will EVER see that from Apple.
Indeed, or would some guy invent an app for it?
Or at least, allow the integrated GPU to support external monitors when only iGPU is open.

Honestly, the integrated GPU could handle most of everyday jobs.
We only need the independent GPU when video processing or gaming.
And we should have the right to decide which one to use.
 

Alex Kurylev

macrumors newbie
Dec 17, 2019
10
1
Indeed, or would some guy invent an app for it?
Or at least, allow the integrated GPU to support external monitors when only iGPU is open.

Honestly, the integrated GPU could handle most of everyday jobs.
We only need the independent GPU when video processing or gaming.
And we should have the right to decide which one to use.

I fully support you! It is necessary to make an option as at eGPU, manually to choose Radeon.
 

am2am

macrumors regular
Oct 15, 2011
223
103
Indeed, or would some guy invent an app for it?
Or at least, allow the integrated GPU to support external monitors when only iGPU is open.

Honestly, the integrated GPU could handle most of everyday jobs.
We only need the independent GPU when video processing or gaming.
And we should have the right to decide which one to use.
It won't help you with external monitor. It has something to do with signal/wiring - external monitor runs always through dGPU. If you manually force iGPU only (yes you can do this in terminal - no app is needed) and connect monitor it will remain blanc.
 

magbarn

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2008
3,034
2,402
Automatic graphics switching has been an issue on macOS since the 2012/2013 MBP’s with NVIDIA 6XX/7XX series. What pro users want/need is basically a PCIe slot control management software style app/interface to direct and/or override the OS and say “use this GPU right now for this”. I seriously doubt we will EVER see that from Apple.
You would think this would be the case, but no one has done it reliably well. Apple's implementation of graphics switching has only the dGPU connected to external monitor output. Hence for people who have defective dGPU's such as the 2011 MBP who have disabled the dGPU completely to continue using their machines disables the ability to use external monitors.

PC laptops use Nvidia's optimus which does allow igpu usage with external monitor but I've yet to use a PC laptop that consistently correctly chooses which GPU to use as Razer, Alienware, MSI gaming laptops I've used will frequently go to dGPU when they don't need to and end up draining the battery too fast.

TLDR, if you want something cool when using external monitor, stick to iGPU only laptops, get a TB3 enclosed dGPU or get a desktop.
 

saudor

macrumors 68000
Jul 18, 2011
1,512
2,115
The screenshot is attached.

Btw,
1) It's colder in my room now,
2) I have decreased resolutions of both displays, and
3) No heavy apps open, but...

the results are still bad - the case is too warm and the fans are noisy: RPM1=3700 and RPM2=4000.
And remember, these fans are bigger, so they generate more noise at the same RPM.

P.S. If I limit fans at RPM1=RPM2, which is acceptable, the temperature quickly rises to 90+.

not sure if anyone's mentioned it but that system looks like it's running some malware. What's that driverkit user? Also that green button in the menu bar showing 29 degrees is adware/malware

EDIT: driverkit seems to be catalina related (i think)
 
Last edited:

Mr. Incandenza

macrumors newbie
Jun 23, 2013
29
34
I think this is an Apple/AMD problem in general.

On the PC drivers you'll consistently see people complaining about inflated memory speeds and gpu clocks when a second monitor is connected. AMD will seemingly squash and then reintroduce this bug over and over.

My 2014 iMac does the same thing, connect an external monitor and the graphics card is stuck using 40 watts, constantly.

I think the external monitor forces the GPU into running at elevated clocks, both memory and gpu.

They've got a week to fix it or I'm returning it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.