That does not help though, as using some external screens unscaled is not really an option.In an earlier post, I tried to explain to the OP that running the displays using ANY kind of "scaling" was going to make the laptop work much harder, but I don't think that it "registered" with him...
In an earlier post, I tried to explain to the OP that running the displays using ANY kind of "scaling" was going to make the laptop work much harder, but I don't think that it "registered" with him...
Thanks for the input, just to clarify:
1) Both the 15” and the 16” run fine with ANY resolution, up to 3840x2400, as long as there is no external monitor. The problems arises when I connect an external monitor.
2) I am not mirroring the displays, the content is different on them.
So are the following settings supposed to work fine, if we disregard the fact that the text is too small? I am not able to pick the same refresh rate though.
In an earlier post, I tried to explain to the OP that running the displays using ANY kind of "scaling" was going to make the laptop work much harder, but I don't think that it "registered" with him...
Newer MacBook Pros use a scaled resolution as their "standard" resolution in the settings.Does the "More Space" option in far right affect how the GPU works?
It looks the original resolution to me. The "default to display" looks like a scaled UI. Am I correct?
Have you tried running any VMs out of interest, or full screen 4K video even - does the fan behave itself ?I just got mine yesterday. i7/32GB RAM/512GB SSD/5300M. I was a bit worried about this as I'm basically using the MBP as a desktop replacement, but mine is very quiet.
In clamshell mode it runs even quieter, for daily tasks I don't hear the fan spin up at all. With the lid open the fan is audible, but it's just a low pitch noise, not annoying at all.
I'm driving a 3440x1440 display (34GK950F) with it, so no scaling is going on which may be a factor. However, it's also a 120Hz display which certainly adds a lot more demand on the GPU. My old Surface Book couldn't drive this monitor at its native refresh rate without dropping frames frequently.
I just got mine yesterday. i7/32GB RAM/512GB SSD/5300M. I was a bit worried about this as I'm basically using the MBP as a desktop replacement, but mine is very quiet.
In clamshell mode it runs even quieter, for daily tasks I don't hear the fan spin up at all. With the lid open the fan is audible, but it's just a low pitch noise, not annoying at all.
I'm driving a 3440x1440 display (34GK950F) with it, so no scaling is going on which may be a factor. However, it's also a 120Hz display which certainly adds a lot more demand on the GPU. My old Surface Book couldn't drive this monitor at its native refresh rate without dropping frames frequently.
When playing 4K video it is nearly silent. In VLC, I only see like 15-20% CPU usage.Have you tried running any VMs out of interest, or full screen 4K video even - does the fan behave itself ?
In an earlier post, I tried to explain to the OP that running the displays using ANY kind of "scaling" was going to make the laptop work much harder, but I don't think that it "registered" with him...
I have just sold my 13" quad core with iGPU because it's too small for me.
Let's wait for other reviewers, maybe the 5500M with 8 GB has a proper heat sink...
I'm driving a 3440x1440 display (34GK950F) with it, so no scaling is going on which may be a factor. However, it's also a 120Hz display which certainly adds a lot more demand on the GPU. My old Surface Book couldn't drive this monitor at its native refresh rate without dropping frames frequently.
Hmm, the MBP only sees it as 120Hz? Guess it’s still limited to DisplayPort 1.2. Thats a shame.
But yeah. Using native resolutions is less taxing on the GPU. 120Hz isn’t too bad, really. Scrolling and moving windows doesn’t stress the CPU that much more, but the GPU does work a little harder to raster everything. But it’s not the same as gaming at 120Hz.
Do you think that the "native" 4K-5K LG Ultrafine monitors that Apple sales perform better (heat wise) than our Dell, Sumsung and other brands?TL;DR: If you don't need Thunderbolt capabilities but just an external monitor, Thunderbolt protocol can make your laptop heat up. Try to stick with USB-C docks if it's compatible with your configuration/monitor/refresh rate.
I don't use thunderbolt at home, only USB-C cables/adapters to connect my monitors. Makes no differenceI did some testing when I got my 2017 15", and found out that most of the heat is caused by the activation of the Thunderbolt chips:
I don't know if this is the issue you guys are experiencing, but just connecting a Thunderbolt accessory resulted in a 8°C spike which, in some ambient temperatures, is just enough to go over the idling threshold and make the fans spin up a bit. In the end I swapped my CalDigit TS3 with their USB-C Dock, back in the day when it was a real USB-C Dock. Now it's called "USB-C Pro Dock" and supports Thunderbolt, so I wouldn't really know what to recommend for new buyers.
TL;DR: If you don't need Thunderbolt capabilities but just an external monitor, Thunderbolt protocol can make your laptop heat up. Try to stick with USB-C docks if it's compatible with your configuration/monitor/refresh rate.
Concur.I don't use thunderbolt at home, only USB-C cables/adapters to connect my monitors. Makes no difference